Lecture Unit 6: Dynamic competition across time (1/3) Flashcards
How can price competition be viewed?
- Price competition can be viewed as a dynamic process
- Decisions by a firm today will affect its behavior as well as its competitors’ behaviors in the future
In what dimensions can dynamic competition occur?
Dynamic competition can occur in non-price dimensions such as quality or advertising
What are the limitations of static models in explaining price competition?
- cannot explain how firms can maintain prices above competitive levels without formal collusion
- In other situations, even a small number of firms are sufficient to produce intense price competition.
What is the difference between dynamic models and static models?
- Dynamic models can address questions that static models cannot (e.g., what determines the intensity of price competition?)
- If the number of firms is not too large and the response time to price changes is short, firms may adopt a strategy of always matching each other’s prices.
- Short term profits in a static model often lead to long term negative effects in a dynamic model.
What is the usefulness of dynamic models?
- are useful in exploring situations where price competition and
- other competitive behaviors need to be analyzed over time.
–>Limitiations of static models
What questions can dynamic models address that static models cannot?
Dynamic models can address questions such as what determines the intensity of price competition.
Why might it make sense for firms to adopt a strategy of always matching each other’s prices?
- As long as the number of firms is not too large and
- the length of time it takes for firms to respond to each other’s prices is not too long,
- it makes sense for firms to adopt a strategy of always matching each other’s prices.
What is a potential long-term effect of short-term profits in a static model?
- What appears as short-term profits in a static model
- are often followed by long-term negative effects in a dynamic model.
What are strategic commitment?
- decisions that have long run impacts and
- are difficult to reverse,
What are the characteristics of strategic commitment, what do they do
- alter the strategic decisions of rivals through irreversible decisions
- They can make a simulltaneous move game into a sequential move game
- Involves anticipating market rivalry
What are the characteristics of the irreversible decision of a strategic commitment have?
A strategic commitment must involve a irreversible decision that is
- visible
- understandable, and
- credible
How can one asses strategic commiitment ?
- Assessing strategic commitments involves anticipating market rivalry
What are strategic subsitutes?
- When a firm’s action induces the rival to take the opposite action
What are the strategic subsitutes in a Cournot duopoly?
- In Cournot duopoly models, quantities are strategic substitutes.
- A quantity increase is the profit-maximizing response to a competitor’s quantity reduction (reaction function with a downward slope)
What are strategic complements?
What does the bertrand duopoly say about it?
- When a firm’s action induces the rival to take the same action
What are the strategic complements in bertrand duopoly?
- prices are strategic complements:
- a price cut is the profit maximizing response to a competitor’s price cut (reaction function with an upward slope)
What are the effects of commitments on a firm’s profitability?
Commitments have both a direct and a strategic effect on a firm’s profitability.
What is the meant with the direct effect of commitments on a firm´s profitability?
= is its impact on the PV of the firm’s profits if the competitor’s behavior does not change
What is the meant with the strategic effect of commitments on a firm´s profitability?
= takes into account the competitive side effects of the commitment
What is the difference between a tough commitment and a soft commitment?
Tough commitment
- hurts the competitors
- conforms to the traditional view of competition
Soft commitment
- may be beneficial if the strategic effect of the commitment is sufficiently positive
- soft commitment helps the competition
When do tough commitments have a proftiable and a negative strategic effect?
Tough commitments have a profitable strategic effect
- if they involve strategic substitutes.
Tough commitments have a negative strategic effect
- if they involve strategic complements.
What are the different outcomes depending onn the decision tough/soft in a 2-stage model?
- Stage: Firm 1 makes either a soft or tough commitment
-
Stage: Competition between the rivals
–>either Cournot or Bertrand
What is the situation in a Cournot after a tough commitment?
- Firm 1 commits to a higher than previous output for every output choice of the rival (Tough)
- Firm 2’s reaction function makes the equilibrium output of Firm 1 even higher
- Firm 2 produces less than what it used to produce
What is the situation of a Cournot after a soft commitment?
- Firm 1 shifts its reaction function to the left, (Soft)
- committing to produce less (than pre-commitment level) for every level of rival’s output
Firm 2:
- Rival’s reaction hurts Firm 1 by making its output fall further
- Firm 2 produces more than what it produced without Firm 1’s soft commitment