Lecture 9 - sex/gender and cognition Flashcards
sex/gender differences in cognition
- there is evidence the sex/gender can influence performance on a range of cog tasks: visuospatial abilities, verbal abilities, attention, memory, maths
- effect sizes are small and inconsistent
- findings refer to averages not indivs
sex/gender differences in cognition: visuospatial abilities
- visuospatial cog = processes inc spatial perception, visualisation, generation/maintenance of spatial images & mental rotation
- most studies focus on mental rotation
- tasks may inc water level test, line orientation task (medium effect sizes) while paper folding task is small effect sizes
- Kheloui et al (2023) - men typically outperform mental rotation tasks (largest effect sizes & consistent)
> Collins & Kimura (1997) - 2 rotation measures: 2D (easy vs hard) and 3d. sex/gender difs present in all versions of the task, especially 2D easy task - seems to be effect of difficulty - meta analyses favour men for mental rotation and spatial perception
- on other visuospatial tasks men seem to do slightly better but effect sizes smaller than mental rotation.
- however women outperform on tasks of spatial location memory.
> Voyer et al (2007) meta analysis - dif favours women and some interaction with objects: men better with ‘masc’ objects. reflective of womens better verbal ability (use verbal list?)
> may be due to methodological or theoretical effects on subprocesses that underpin OLM
sex/gender differences in cognition: verbal abilities
- women seem to outperform men on these tasks
- verbal abilities: reading comp, spelling, writing, verbal memory (memory for words) & verbal fluency (ease someone can produce verbal info & subdivided into letter and category fluency)
- meta analyses show small effect size favouring women for range of verbal tasks and medium effect for verbal fluency. women also favoured for english language arts, reading/writing skills, phonemic fluency & verbal fluency
- individual studies suggest an inconsistency
- Kheloui et al (2023) - magnitude of sex/gender difs depend on task used and whether age/education controlled for
> Mathuranath et al (2003) - examined affect of age education and gender on verbal fluency. found no sex dif in either task. level of ed ifnluenced letter fluency not age or gender.
sex/gender differences in cognition: attention
- attention inc processes: selective attention, sustained, divided and executive attention. they interact to shape perception with sensory inputs via 3 networks: orientation, signalling & executive networks
- some suggestion women outperform tests of attentional ability
- some suggest women more susceptible to distraction by invalid cues, others suggest womens use of cue depends on the type of cue used
- fewer studies looked at sustained or divided attention but those that have suggest men are better at this - but not consistent
sex/gender differences in cognition: memory
- Voyer et al. (2007) meta analysis: women outperform men on tests of episodic memory more accurately & in more detail & OLM
- meta analysis shows men more variance in verbal and spatial episodic memory while women more variance in route memory
- women appear to outperform men in recall & recognition for verbal episodic memory with small effect sizes
- some evidence that memory can be influenced by sex hormones (estradiol & progesterone) especially for those memory processes that involve cognitive control
sex/gender differences in cognition: mathematics
- most controversial finding
- orginally documented (Benbow & Stanley 1980) that by age 13 a large sex dif appears in favour of males, especially at upper end of distribution led to idea that boys were stronger in maths
- does a dif really exist? women seem to achieve better marks in maths tests vs boys & other meta analyses show minor effect size favouring boys.
- effect sizes depending on contextual factors: type of school, type of test, extracurriculars, encouragement towards maths (stereotypes)
- stereotypes modulate cog abilities and can impair performance (stereotype threat effect) or create challenge to do better (stereotype reactance effect)
- pos stereotypes can directly improve performance (stereotype lift effect)
what is causing inconsistencies in cognitive sex/gender differences
- bio factors related to sex
> sex hormones influencing selective attention
> sex hormones influencing visuospatial abilities - socio-cultural factors & gender
> male typical activities can reduce some difs
> training can reduce some sex/gender difs
> differ cross cultural with different gender equality levels
> gender stereotypes & gender identification
sex hormones
- steroid hormones that interact with steroid hormone receptors
- can be endogenous (naturally occurring) or exogenous (synthetic)
- endogenous synthesised by gonads (testes & ovaries) and adrenal glands
> lipophilicity = can cross the blood-brain barrier and interact with receptors in brain
> can also be synthesised locally in brain - 3 groups of sex hormones: estrogens, progestins and androgens
- most important human derivatives are: estradiol, progesterone and testosterone
what effects do sex hormones have
- affect body and brain across lifespan
> earliest ifnluence is foetal dev: embryo develops as male or female
> puberty: promotion of sex specific characteristics
> reproductive behaviour & functions - sex hormones also influence body in ways that are not related to sexual behaviour or sex differentiation
> impact on cardiovascular health e.g. oral cont and blood clots
> bone health & muscle dev
> immune system
> synthesis of insulin - also affect brain fuctions
activating effects of sex hormones
- sex hormones can have transient effects that result in dynamic changes in functional brain org, activity & cog finctions (activating effects)
- often studied with menstrual cycle as can track impact of hormones
- lateralisation fluctuates across menstrual cycle in line with hormones
- some studies show FCAs inc during high hormone phases, others show dec
- Hausmann & Gunturkun (2020) - identified an interaction between cycle phase and FCAs in all tasks indicating a general reduction in FCAs during high progesterone luteal phase
> in contrast FCAs were stable across time in postmenopausal women and men
how do sex hormones influence FCAs
- in slight of evidence suggesting high levels of P reduce lateralisation, Hausmann et al proposed progesterone-mediated decoupling hypothesis
> high P reduces interhemispheric inhibition by suppressing excitatory neural response to glutamate and inc inhibitiory response to GABA
> dom hem no longer suppresses activity in non-dom hem and asymmetry reduced. - Weis et al (2008) dircetly investigated this in cog tasks: most signif activation during word matching was left frontal inferior gyrus (exerted inhibitory influence over right ifg that was stronger during menstrual phase of low E and high P)
- high estradiol associated with reduction of interhemispheric inhibition in both cycle phases
- Weis (2011) E can also reduce functional connectivity between heterotopic regions
sex hormones, FCAs and cognition
- performance on cog tasks can vary in line with hormonal fluctuations
- Hausmann et al (2000) - performance on 3D mental rotation was worse during luteal phase (High E and high P) vs menstrual phase (Low E and Low P). = having high E and high P impairs performance on rotation tasks
- T improves visuospatial abilities
- E and P shown to improve verbal fluency while T impairs this
- others suggest it is not the performance that fluctuates but the strategies used to complete the tasks. cycle phase can interact with strategy use & during luteal phase accuracy for euclidian strategy dec while accuracy for landmark strategy inc vs follicular cycle phase
- sex hormones can influence performance of tasks associated with pfc (higher order cognition) e.g. dichotic listening task - sex hormone fluctuations = top down Cog control improved during follicular phase (estradiol levels related)
- effect of estradiol may depend in indiv difs in baseline dopaminergic function - can look at someones genotype if they have good or poor baseline dopamine. certain alleles (yal/yal) = lower dopamine. too much dop with oestradiol impairs performance (relates to stress)
individual differences in sex hormonal effects
- Jacobs & d’esposito (2011) investigated interaction between E and dopamine across Wm tasks. women with low baseline dopamine had poor wm during menstrual phase but improved during follicular phase when estradiol inc
- high dop show opp pattern
- estradiol impacts wm and the direction depends on indices of baseline dopamine.
- affects treatment of menopause using hormone therapy
- suggests there may be a sex/gender dif in effect of dopaminergic medications
developmental influences on sex/gender differences
- engaging in male typical play is associated with better spatial ability. these could be adapted into training programmes to improve spatial skills
- also seen in neural changes
> Haier et al (2009) groups who had testric practice vs no experience of games showed thicker cortex in two areas: left BA6 and 22/38. also showed activity dec in several frontal areas.
cultural influences on sex/gender differences
- two tribes in northeast india show similar genetics, locations, diet 7 wealth but key differneces in sex/gender roles (partillineal vs matrilinneal)
- Hoffman et al (2011) - cross cultural study of gender difs in spatial abilities - 33% variance was explained by difs in education level and can maintain sex/gender difs
- in patriarchal society we see higher mean times to solve puzzles
gender stereotype effects on sex/gender differences
- stereotype threat effects
- stereotype resistance effects
- Wraga et al (2006) - sex/gender difs in mental rotation change in response to environmental cies. sex/gender difs are also driven by sociocultural factors - may help explain inconsistencies in literature
> mental rotation worse for women than men
> pos stereotype on women performance reduced gap but still more errors
> a pos stereotype of womens performance reduced mens performance - Hausmann (2014) 0 investigated whether gender stereotypes/academic background affected performance on sex/gender sensitive tasks.
> males outperformed f but there s interaction of science/arts conditions and stereotyped conditions. affect predominantly driven by arts students who were given stereotype threat effect.
> priming academic identity also primes gender identity
> f arts students vulnerable to stereotype threat in a cog domain perceived as being associated with science & male