Lecture 10 - sex/gender differences: the biopsychosocial approach Flashcards
1
Q
biopsychosocial approach
A
- suggests sex/gender differences are a product of several non-binary factors including biological psychological and social factors
- sex/gender difs have small effect sizes. why?
> dif methodological approahces & reference measures
>small or heterogenous sample
> specific task used
> limited consideration of sex/gender related factors that can explain inter & intra difs in brain and behaviour - limited studies using this approach due to:
> methodologically difficult
> dispute over how to account for sex & gender
2
Q
biopsychosocial studies of sex/gender and brain structure
A
- Belfi et al (2014) - investigated gender roles & brain structure in 108 children. found
> male sex associated with higher continuum score on sex role inventory (more masc)
> masc pos cor with WM vol in frontal lobe
> fem pos cor with GM vol in temporal lobe
3
Q
biopsychosocial studies of sex/gender and brain function
A
- wraga et al (2006) - showed mental rotation performance could be affected by exposure to gender stereotypes
- wraga et al (2007) - used fmri. behavioural data showed:
> poorer performance in neg stereotype group mental rotation task
> improved performance in positive stereotype group - their fmri data also shows
> poor performance in neg stereotype group was characterised by inc activation in regions associated with emotional processing e.g. orbital and medial frontal gyru and ACC = inc emotional load
> women reported not affected by this stereotype = shows this operates at unconscious level
> pos stereotype = inc activation of secondary visual processing areas (superior occipital gyrus and anterior prefrontal gyrus) associated with mental rotation and cog functions. but not activation of emotional processing
4
Q
biopsychosocial studies of sex/gender and cognition
A
- other studies looking at cog testing & endocrinological measures to investigate stereotype threat effect
- Hausmann et al (2009) looked at this as T was associated with mental rotation performance in men. found:
> mental rotation performance in men pos related to T
> in women, gender stereotype score neg related to mental rotation performance.
> exposing males to neg female stereotype inc T and improved their performance - similar results by pletzer et al (2019) found:
> relationship between sex hormones and masculinity. oestradiol had pos effect on mental rotation
> T and progesterone only helped mental rotation in male pp’s
> in females strong relationship between T and self identified masculinity which cor with high rates of mental rotation - but for true biopsychosocial approach should distinguish between sex and gender
5
Q
biopsychosocial approach accounting for both sex and gender
A
- research is limited by a lack of universal agreement on definitions of sex and gender resulting in most studies separating into dichotomous m/f groups
- studies of the brain to date have not acknowledged the impact of gender and binary sex for partitioning subjects
6
Q
Diversifying cognitive neuroscience
A
- transgender and nonbinary people have largely been ignored in research
7
Q
research with transgender pps
A
- Dotson and Duarte (2019) highlight importance of diversity in cognitive neuroscience & racial diversity. reviewed research and only 8% studies considered effect of sex/gender.
- implicates reproducibility, generalisability and development of treatments - why?
> previously discussed issues with inc only male pp’s
> bio difs between cis and trans people unaccounted for - should also invetigate trans pp’s to validate the trans experience, learn more to support them and better understand the nature of gender and a psychosocial construct
8
Q
transgender identities: lived experiences
A
- these studies aim to find out what it is like to be trans & how it aligns with bio sex
- Harrison et al (2020) - 8 in depth interviews. 3 themes emerged:
1. accessing healthcare services
2. searching for acceptance
3. Impact of gender dysphoria on psychological wellbeing - Moolchaem et al (2015) - synthesis of qualitative studies that explored lived experiences of trans people. results showed 5 major themes:
a. crossing gender & physical problems in life
b. experiencing psych distress
c. encountering discrimination and social exclusion
d. having relationships does matter
e. dealing with difficulties in life - there is a need for health care providers social workers and health promoters to support trans indivs for their health & wellbeing
9
Q
trans identities: cog neuroscience
A
- cis brains are not truly sexually dimorphic
- Kurth et al (2022) investigated if trans brains resemble birth sex or their gender identity
> trans womens brains fit inbetween two cisgender brains = shift away from male typical brain structure
> suggests gender identity shapes brain structure more so than bio sex - Mueller et al (2021) - both transgender and cisgender groups differed in subcortical brain volumes and surface area
> structural patterns depended on brain region examined and direction of gender identity
> trans brains have their own phenotype (mosaic)
10
Q
non-binary gender identities: lived experiences
A
- these studies shed light on the nature of gender as a psychosocial construct
- Giannantonio et al (2024) - investigated exp and milestones of non-binary identification and identify challenges. semi structured interviews showed 4 domains:
1. growing up in a binary world
2. gender dysphoria
3. nonbinary awareness
4. looking forward
11
Q
gender affirming (hormone) therapy
A
- refers to medical treatment given to a trans person that helps bring their physical body in line with their gender identity
- studies look at impact of gender affirming therapy on psychological wellbeing, quality of life and daily functioning of transgender people
> Harrison et al (2020) - looked at lived exp of accessing care as trans person - need more translational research from biomedicine and neuroscience here to understand how ga therapy influences neurological processes & behaviour
- aghi et al (2022) - current research fails to address needs of GAHT users
12
Q
impact of engaging with neuroscience research on sex/gender
A
- Sahin and Yalcinkaya (2020) - 2 studies exposed pps to neuroscience research findings on sex/gender difs and similarities in brain & measures essentialist beliefs.
> pp’s exposed to scientific ev on brain similarities between m and f reported lower gender essentialism
> suggests exposure to info on brain similarities can challenge essentialist views on gender which indirectly relates to sexism
> has implications on improving gender equality in cultures where this remains an issue