Lecture 9 - Insanity, automatism & intoxication Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the defence of insanity ?

A

a defence for people who as a result of their mental condition should not be held responsible for what would otherwise be criminal conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is needed according to the mnaghten case for a defence of insanity

A

1 - at the time of committing the act
2 - the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason
3 - from disease of the mind
4 - not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing
5 - or if he did know it that he did not know what he was doing was wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the significance of the r v clarke case 1972

A

establishes that the mnaghten rules dont apply when there has been a momentary failure to concentrate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is meant by disease of the mind in relation to insanity

A

it means a disease which affects the proper functioning of the mind and mind according to the r v hennessy case means the mental faculties of reason, memory and understanding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is automatism

A

if a person totally lacked control of there body at the time of the offence and that lack of control was not caused by his or her own prior fault then they may plead not guilty and be acquitted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the significance of the r v smallshire case

A

establishes that an external cause is needed for a defence of automatism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly