Lecture 4 - Mens Rea Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the significance of the cunningham case

A

it sets out the cunningham test which states that D is consciously aware either that they wish to bring about a particular result or that it is a virtual certainty or that they are aware of a risk of a bad outcome occurring and they unreasonably run this risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the significance of the caldwell case

A

sets out the caldwell test where d is not aware of a risk of a bad outcome eventhough it was obvious and should have been foreseen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two forms of intention in criminal law

A

Direct intent - to act in order to produce a desired result
Oblique intent - to act with the awareness that a particular outcome is virtually certain barring some unforeseen intervention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What test could the courts use to decipher direct intention

A

Duffs ‘test of failure’ which asks if a person would regard themselves as having failed if the result that did occur had not happened i.e if they didnt get what they wanted will it have been a failure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the significance of R v Moloney

A

this case sets out the golden rule which states that the jury does not need special direction for specific intent cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the significance of R v Woollin

A

R v Nedrick gave the courts two questions to decipher intention 1. was death or gbh virtually a certain consequence of ds conduct 2. was d aware that death or gbh was virtually certain from his conduct. However in R v Woollin the house of lords confirmed that the virtual certainty test in nedrick should be applied when considering oblique intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was the issue with DPP v Smith

A

the rule that came out was whether a reasonable man would have contemplated gbh being a likely result from smith’s actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the test for recklessness

A

is the defendant aware of the risk ? if so does the defendant unreasonably take that risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly