Lecture 9: Industrialism, Post-Industrialism, and the Post-Colony Flashcards
1
Q
Industrialism as the Economic Base
A
- Industrial Revolution: around 1760 (in England) to 1840 (in many other places), and beyond
- the biggest impact was making big factories putting smoke into the air
- it spread from West to East and Center to North and South; the IR didn’t arrive at the same time all around Europe
- it’s a very technologically-oriented mode of production; the machines can produce things faster and better than humans
- relations of production:
- manufacturing
- wage labour; people working for pay
- there’s no loyalty; you don’t have any obligations towards your employer aside from doing your job, and if you find a new job you can leave
- but the employer also has the right to kick you out of your job if you aren’t doing it well enough since they have no loyalty/obligation to you aside from giving you pay
- unprecedented surpluses
2
Q
Relations of Production: The Class System
A
- there were always divisions in society, but not like the class society in industrialized societies
- the main reason is because they’re not defined by law or tradition, but by the economy
- “upward mobility” (moving up through classes) is ideally very possible
- but in practice may be pretty difficulty
-
bourgeoisie: the industrialists/investors/bankers, or “capitalists”, they are the highest class
- originated mainly among the townsfolk of the agricultural period
- the working class (historically) emerged from the peasants
- the largest class in industrial society (as opposed to post-industrial, where most people are middle class)
- in the agricultural society, the working class (peasants) were also the biggest populations
- working class organizations (e.g. unions)
- socialism arose as a result of workers wanting a say in how society should be run, as opposed to everything being decided by the bourgeoisie
- these ideas have now become fairly mainstream
3
Q
Industrialist Superstructures
A
- megalopolis: a huge urban conglomeration (e.g. The Golden Horseshoe of Ontario)
- cities (which are contained inside the megalopolis)
- market ideology: the idea that the best way for people to be as wealthy as possible is to have a free (as possible) market
- individualism—in order to be efficient, individuals should move into jobs that they’re most competent in and manufacturers should only put into the market what people what/need
- the fact that there isn’t any loyalty in this system isn’t a sad thing
- nationalism—it’s more efficient to have united countries
- capitalism wasn’t the cause of the German or Italian unification, but it wasn’t a coincidence
- love marriage—e.g. if you and your husband want to be anthropology professors, and you get a job in Pennsylvania and he gets a job in Northern BC, it would make more sense for both of you to move and forget about him and find a new job in Pennsylvania
- people used to live with their extended families, but now it’s become very nuclear
- and we even promote children moving out to increase efficiency
4
Q
The Post-Industrial Society
A
- the term originated in the 1970s, which is when people started noticing changes
- means of production: knowledge and technology; manufacturing and agriculture are no longer the main means of production
- the largest class is the middle class—it’s not a coincidence that there aren’t as many factory workers anymore; workers move into knowledge industries
- the consumer becomes “king”—finding things they want to buy is just as important as giving them what they want to buy; i.e. create demand
- the rise of “youth culture” because there’s a generation gap
- because there’s a knowledge industry, people are in schools for longer periods of time
- not just youth, but many new cultures appear (that are targeted towards youth)
5
Q
Post-Industrial Relations of Production: Within the State
A
- in the rich (“developed”) countries, the service sectors become very important; they are perhaps more important than manufacturing and agriculture
- increasing income disparities (compared to industrial societies)
- growth of unemployed or underemployed “surplus” populations
6
Q
Post-Industrial Relations of Production: Globalization
A
- there are internationalized activities by investors and entrepreneurs
- businesses, banks, and big companies become international
pros:
- more efficient production
- often we see the rise of the middle class around the world
- ordinary people migrate and make contact with other people
cons:
- in general, business and investment move around the world but people don’t
- in the EU, if you’re a citizen of one country you can move anywhere there to work, but not the same with the rest of the world
- we think it’s normal that someone who’s born in Guatemala can’t just randomly come and work in Canada without governments letting them in
- what’s efficient about moving into other countries is that those people will do the work for cheaper; i.e. outsourcing to “developing” countries
- increasing waves of illegal migration—if you lived somewhere where you had to work very hard to make very little, it makes sense you’d try to move
- “bad neighborhoods” of surplus or underpaid labour in rich and poor countries; “law and order” issues
- “failed states” among the poor countries; “corruption” issues
7
Q
Industry and Post-Industrial Societies in a Globalized Economy
A
- only the rich world is post-industrial
- the post-colony undergoes a form of industrialization
- in the rich world: a nostalgia for working class manufacturing jobs
8
Q
Unequal Development and Emerging Markets
A
- Forbes Magazine (2014): the 67 richest people own as much wealth as the poorer half of the world’s population
- Forbes Magazine (2015): of the 10 richest people in the world, 7 are Americans, 1 is French, 1 is Spanish, and 1 is Mexican
- the distribution of wealth could not be more unequal
- who is to blame?
- the World Bank, multinational corporations, neoliberalism, bleeding-heart liberals, lack of education, backwards culture, dictatorship, globalization, religion, the West, misguided MGOs, cliques and mafias, government red tape, sexism, corruption, right-wing conservations, class or caste prejudice, etc.
- all of these people are being blamed, but we don’t have a real solution to solve unequal development
- the relatively wealthy middle class is expanding in several “emerging market” countries
- the GDP is raising in the developing world
- but the great majority of people who continue to live there are still poor
9
Q
Colonial Origins of Unequal Development
A
- the colonizing western powers wanted to bring “civilization and religion” to these savage countries
- but it most often has to do with business gains—it was always in the colonizer’s interests
- refashioned production and markets in the colonies and semi-colonies
- the focus was on developing sources of raw material
- for industrial development (manufacturing) in the mother country
- the result was a dependent economy directed by the colonial power to serve the colonizing country
10
Q
The Post-Colony
A
- post-colony: (1) a former colony or now dominated country, now independent, or (2) the state of all former colonies, taken together
- the point is that the means and relations of production did not change when the colonizers left
- the political system is different, but the economic systems remained much the same
- the foreign owners and production managers remained in the post-colony
- or the local people replaced them, but the system still doesn’t really change
11
Q
Development Models to End Unequal Distribution
A
- the oldest one is supporting large-scale government projects
- e.g. damns, new cities, etc.
- typically undertaken by the local government with foreign aid
- now less in favour
- foreign aid; i.e. giving money to developing countries and let the governments use the money
- considered to be a failed policy
- neoliberal models; an orientation that supports free markets
- Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations (1776): Every individual “intends only his own gain, [but] is […] led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention.”
- laissez-faire, “let them act” or “let it be” capitalism
- liberalism; originated in the late eighteenth and nineteenth century
- neoliberalism; the new version currently dominating national and international economic policy
- ideally, the government doesn’t get directly involved in it (the government can’t possibly not be involved)
- in this context, liberal is not the opposite of conservative; many conservatives tend to be neoliberal, some of them are called “neoconservative”
- the prefix neo- just means “new”
12
Q
Neoliberalism Success Stories: The Asian Tigers
A
- four newly (1960s-1990s) industrialized nations: Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, and South Korea
- if you look at the GDP in 2014 (in USD)—South Korea: $35k; Taiwan: $46k; Hong Kong: $55k; Singapore: $78k; compared to Canada: $44.9k
- neoliberals attribute success to neoliberal market reforms
- others believe government intervention was important
- aside from the Four Tigers, these results have been hard to reproduce elsewhere
13
Q
Neoliberal Models: IMF and the World Bank
A
- they don’t get directly involved, but they lend money and give advice
- they are the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank
- they have a very neoliberal attitude; by investing in free markets, they will produce more countries like the Four Tigers (but this hasn’t happened)
- they’re international organizations, but dominated by the USA and the rich countries
- they lend money to countries that are in need; so those countries become indebted
- in return for lending their money, the IMF and World Bank demand free-market reforms
- criticisms: the system may not work; it often happens that a country will develop, but not make enough money to pay back their debt
- economic growth can slow down because the government stops focusing on the economy and starts worrying about paying back the debt
- however, it’s a complex issue and it’s hard to say that any one model could certainly lead to the proper, desired economic growth
14
Q
Neoliberal Models: Microfinance
A
- microfinance: lending on a small scale to the local business people
- criticisms: does this system really work?
- it’s difficult to monitor; quite often, the accounts aren’t as well-kept or audited as by banks
- there’s a high rate of interest (as high as 28%) because the local loan people need to borrow money themselves from banks
- there are many layers to the borrowing; and each layer added increases the interest
- most MFIs operate on too small of a scale to achieve high earnings
- most MFIs would gladly take a factory job than start their own business; the better way to bring people out of poverty would be to create more stable, well-paying jobs
- microfinance can create more opportunities for women
- in many cases, women tend to be the principle borrowers
- however, we see in many cases that the husbands are the ones who own the business and won’t let their wives go anywhere near it
- there have been in some cases where women have been empowered, but there hasn’t been a drastic change
- other development models: the fair trade movement
- conducted by NGOs, typically from or supported by the rich countries
- criticisms: these activities may develop local clients and new inequalities
- how anthropologists can help: study the effect of development policies “on the ground”