Lecture 3: Constructing Reality Flashcards

1
Q

Goals of the Sociocultural-Linguistic Anthropology Lectures

A
  • discuss society, culture, and language as universal human traits with particular manifestations
  • understand social construction: deconstruct society and culture
    • deconstruct: to analyze by reversing the construction; i.e. we go backwards and try to see how it was constructed

decolonialize the imagination—we’re looking at how language influences the way we imagine/construct the world

  • colonialism refers to the power dynamic between the west and the non-west during the colonial period
  • when we talk about race, we can’t take away the history behind it
  • anthropologists were a part of the enterprise of colonialism; so anthropologists have a responsibility to talk about the differences between the west and non-west and deconstruct their cultures
  • our imagination is constructed in a way that when we look around, we see races; we’re educated in such a way that a person who’s ½ black and ½ white is considered black
  • it’s not about right our wrong, but about how we’re educated
  • decolonializing our imagination means that when we imagine a Canadian, we don’t automatically think of a British Canadian
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Reality As A Construction

A
  • our sense of reality has to do with something appearing in front of us and seeming real; “I’ll believe it when I see it”
  • construction: formed by people in society, nurture not nature
  • reality: a) what is verifiable or b) the world as it makes sense to us
  • most of reality doesn’t come across to us without the filter of signs and language
  • which means reality is socially constructed, since the filter is socially constructed
    • that means you can’t make up your own language or culture
  • it may not always be the same as what really exists: the Real
    • the Real is something that exists whether or not we understand it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Jargon vs. Ordinary Language

A
  • in ordinary language, reality is what’s real
  • in social science/humanities jargon, reality is how we understand the real
  • for the most part, reality seems pretty real and we are well advised to live in it
    • not saying that reality isn’t real, it’s just not the Real; not living in reality would be something like a mental disorder
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Language Constructs Reality

A
  • creates an understanding of distinct concepts and categories as if they were part of the objective world
  • such understandings have bearing on our reality
    • e.g. race is real to us but it’s not part of the Real

e.g. colour in nature—no sharp boundaries between colours

  • colour is a social construct
  • “green” and “blue”—no distinction in old Chinese, old Japanese, Vietnamese, Sioux, and many other languages
  • 青 Chinese qing or Japanese ao “blue or green”
  • 青天 (qing tian) blue sky vs. 青菜 (qing cai) green vegetable
  • the colour spectrum is continuous; it’s language that divides it into units
  • different languages do it in different ways
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Perception and Interpretation, and the Whorf Hypothesis

A

perception and interpretation

  • are people who don’t have different words for green and blue in their language worse at distinguishing the colour?
  • the point is not that old-time Chinese could not see green and blue, but that they didn’t understand them as essentially different

the “Whorf Hypothesis”

  • Benjamin Lee Whorf (1897-1941) was a chemical engineer, fire inspector, and linguist
  • “each language decisively influences the way its speakers think”

particular and universal constructions of language

  • how each language constructs our thoughts and imagination is particular
    • e.g. the word “nice” doesn’t really have a solid translation in other languages
  • how language (rather than languages) constructs the thoughts and imagination of all humans is universal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Jacques Lacan (1901-1981)

A

in Lacanian psychoanalysis, there are three stages of how the self develops:

  • the stage of the real
  • the imaginary (mirror) stage
  • the symbolic stage (accomplished through “language”)

the real stage, ego not yet formed

  • the ego is the sense of self, of being separate from others
  • the real is undifferentiated, meaning the baby doesn’t know the difference between itself and its mom
  • no signs are used or understood in the real
  • uncategorized experience, e.g. the baby doesn’t see the mom, clock, table, etc. as being in separate categories

the imaginary (mirror) stage, the ego beings to form

  • this could happen when a baby first sees itself in the mirror
  • they don’t have to see a mirror, but the point is they see images/representations of themselves
  • it corresponds to the icon; images rather than words (the most typical image sign is the icon)
  • the baby sees its reflection, which is the icon
  • the world is increasingly perceived using signs, but without words
  • the ego image is supported by the authority of Mother/Father/Society
  • roughly, this is the image vs. the words stage

the symbolic stage

  • language appears (which is mostly symbols)
  • language is learned from parents/society
  • language is a complicated system; only we learn it to the same complexity that we know and use
  • in this stage the world is differentiated into categories marked by signifiers (e.g. words)
  • the ego is called “I”
  • the idea that we can have a separate self is in itself constructed by society
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly