Lecture 8 - schemata of the emotional disorders Flashcards

1
Q

explain the background to schema theory

A

Beck 1976
schemata - cognitive frameworks for organizing and storing information
facilitates faster processing of information
activaion of schema influences cognitive processing in terms of perception and memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

schema and psychopathology

A

schema are a core element of cognitive theories of emotional disorders
maladaptive schema cause individuals with psychopathology to process information in a biased manner
consequence of biased processing is that symptoms are maintained

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

name and explain three ways we know that schema are biased

A

interperetations of ambiguous situations - eg neutral stimuli perceived as threatening when anxious
focus of attention on threat - social phobic individuals direct attention towards social threat stimuli to greater degree than non-anxious individuals (Heimrichs and hoffman, 2001)
catastrophising - implications of social events that are negative in valence (Stopa, Clark 2000)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

automatic process and schemata - name 3

A

biases in perception
biases in memory
biases in interpretation (logical errors, attributional style)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

assumptions of schema theory in emotional disorders

A

individuals prone to develop anxiety or depression either have:
1. more extensive database concerning loss, danger
oe
2. have greater ease of access to such a database

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

schemata of anxious individuals

A

selevtively attend to environmental cues related to threat
likely to perceive threatening meaning in ambiguous events
KQ: how can the content of schemata be assessed?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are scripts and what can we use them for

A

scripts - prototypical knowledge about sequence of events that occur in common situations (eg resturant script)
they guide behaviour and are a rich data source for exploring the schematic knowledge sctructures of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what could be some differences between a healthy individual and a social phobics script

A

social phobic = less concrete, had more events that reflected the experience of anxiety and more negatively toned

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

schemata of depressed individuals

A

notice failures rather than successes
infer worst from situations that could be interpreted postively
blame self for failures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

debate of how schema relates to vulnerability in depression (attitudes and thinking)

A
  • stressful life events activate dysfunctional attitudes that lead to onset of depressive symptoms
  • extreme thinking = assessed tp extent to which there is total agreement with dysfunctional attitude scale items
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how does interpretation bias cause its toxic effects

A

ambiguity about social situatoins is resolved through interpretation
everaert et al 2018 have examined how interpretation bias and inflexibility in changing interpretation bias occurs in depression and social anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is interpretation

A

semantic process which involves combining different perspectives of a social situation in order to resolve the ambiguity
distortion in interpretation lead to emotional dysregulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

interpretation bias in depression

A

associated with increased negative and decreased positive interpretations (everaert et al 2017)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

interpretation bias in social anxiety

A

charatcerized by negative interpretations about ambiguous social cues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how do these rigid, unhealthy interpretation biases occur

A

inflexibility in the formation and maintenance of biased interpretations
flexible interpretations of ambiguous information - combining different aspects of a situation simultaneously and integrating novel information as it becomes available
inflexibile interpretations - difficulty is in revising original interpretations when disconfirming evidence is presented

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

recurrence in depression

A

depression is the predominant mental health problem worldwide (mental health foundation, 2014)
more than 80% of people with MD have recurrent episodes (kessler et al 1994)
risk of recurrence increases with number of previous episodes (solomon et al 2000)

17
Q

depression and life events

A

Post (1992) showed that number of life events most strongly associated with first episode of depression
relationship between number of life events and depression is reduced for subsequent episodes

18
Q

extreme thinking and reslapse

A

total number of total agree responses on depressive cognition
higher levels of post-treatment extreme thinking were associated with more relapse even when controlling for depression severity (Teasdale et al, 2001)

19
Q

utility of schema theory

A

useful in predicting:

  • vulnerability for development of pathology
  • vulnerability for relapse
20
Q

utility of schema in predicting vulnerability after trauma

A

key feature of cognitive accounts of PTSD is way events associated with trauma are appraised
collection of maladaptive appraisals about the trauma and its impact mediates the relationship between reactions to trauma and subsequent experience of Post-traumatic stress syptoms
evidence shows negative cognitions about the trauma and its consequences independently predict long term PTSS over and above initial symptom level

21
Q

what can be done in terms of schema to prevent relapse

A

change content of schema and then examine how this change related to vulnerability

22
Q

link between cognitive schemata and vulnerability : eating disorders

A

disorder specific thoughts (control of eating, weight, shape eg Fairburn et al 2003)
cognitive theories of eating disorders argue that dysfunctional schemata contribute to those disordered thoughts

23
Q

tools for assessing schemata in eating disorders

A

eating disorder velief questionnaire (EDBQ, Cooer et al 1997) - assesses ED-related dysfunctional attitudes

24
Q

two factors that could contribute to eating disordered thinking

A

rumination
experiential avoidance - unwillingness to experience negative thoughts, feelings and body sensations leads to efforts to avoid these internal processes

25
Q

what is worry?

A

experienced as similar to talking to oneself about negative outcomes
typically in the form of excessive verbal thoughts as opposed to images (Borkovis and Inz, 1990)
occurs for both GAD individuals as well as non-clinical individuals
relaxation - associated with more imagery for non-clinical and equal imagery for GAD individuals

26
Q

why is worry in thought format

A

cognitive avoidance of worry theory
- images of negative future events avoided during worry by engaging in worrisome verbal thoughts
as a reuls more worry thoughts intrude later - maintaining the worry cycle

27
Q

conclusion on the neture of shcemata in depression, social anxiety, GAD, trauma and ed’s

A

depression is associated with extreme thinking
depression and social anxiety associated with interpretation inflexibility and interpretation bias
GAD with worrying thoughts
trauma is associated with malapdative appraisals
changes in eating schemata associated with changes in ED symptoms

28
Q

why is understanding the nature of schemata in the emotional disorders important

A

design interventions that target these thinking styles