Lecture 7 - attention biases: the role of mechanisms Flashcards
what are mechanisms
factors that are responsible for attentional bias
function is to explain why emotionally disturbed people selectively attend to emotional stimuli
help to identify in what person, in what mood, in what situation or following what event is attentional bias shown
why is there an emphasis on mechanisms for understanding attentional bias
criticial for identifying targets for intervention
key for developing, testing and refining theoretical frameworks for explaining attentional bias
eg - Beck’s schema theory and attentional bias
steps involved in identifying mechanisms
look at convergence of bias manifestation across different paradigms - eg modified stroop, dot probe
develop explanatory frameworks, test and refine them
move from single mediator to interactions of factors
why is it difficult to study mechanismsm underpinning attentional bias
different forms of attentional bias - facilitated attention, disengagement difficulties and attentional avoidance
wide range of mechanisms - neural, cognitive, personality
different mechanisms operate at different stages of information processing (automatic vs srategic)
all three factors must be considered and complex interaction
name three types of attentional bias
facilitated attention
difficulties in disengagement
attentional avoidance
explain facilitated attention
ease with which attention is draw to a stimulus - evidence is mixed but may be due to moderating variables
explain difficulties in disengagement
degree to which threat captures attention and imparis switching attention away from threat to another stimulus, alot of evidence from the visual search task - strong evidence for this bias
explain attentional avoidance
attention preferentially allocated to locations opposite of the threat, indicating avoidance of threat - observeed using dot probe task and at long stimulu intervals
are these processes automatic of strategic?
- threat detection
- attentional avoidance
- attentional disengagement
automatic
strategic
both strategic and automatic
how can attentional bias mechanisms explain the dissociation between memory and attentional processes
activation giving rise to attention bias dies away before mnemonic processes begin
type of activation involved in attentional bias different to that involved in explicit mnemonic encoding
factors that mediate the mechanisms
threat detection mechanism underpins facilitated attention - neurally centered around the amygdala
attentional control underlies difficulty in disengagement
emotion reglation goals underlie attentional avoidance
attention control and emotion regulation controlled by prefrontal cortex
relationship between paradigms ad mechanisms: attnetional bias in anxiety
must have tasks that differentiate between different types of attentional bias
spatial cuing task - assesses both facilitation and disengagement
what mechanism is most robust for explaining attneitonal bias in anxiety
threat detection mechanism that operates automatically and contributes to facilitated attention to threat
what mechanisms for attentional bias in anxiety have less empirical support
mechanisms accounting for disengagement from threat
mechanisms accounting for avoidance of threat
explain cognitive motivational model
vulnerability to anxiety stems from a lower threshold of appraising threat
bias in the direction of attention deployment is less crucial
neutral material is judged as having a higher subjective threat value by high vs low anxious individuals
everyone orients to high threat stimuli as this is functional from an evoluntionary perspective
integrates multiple frameowkrs
two key mechanisms of the cognitive motivational model
threat appraisal
goal engagment
difference between depression and anxiety according to the cognitive motivational model
threat appraisal - key for anxiety
goal engagment - key for depression
why is it important to look at cognitive attentional biases in depression vs anxiety
diagnostic importance
implications for treatment interventions
what mechanism is driving the bias for each disorder
how do we study differences in attentional bias in anxiety vs depression
need stdies where depressed and axious individuals do the same tasks
emotional stroop
dot probe task
why focus on the dot probe and stroop
tasks used with both depressed and axious samples
allow examination of conscious and non-conscious processing
how does variation in methodology account for differences in findings between groups (eg importance of self-relevance of the stimuli)
task irrelevant processes in emotional stroop
emotional stimuli slow colour naming by activating task irrelevant self pre-occupying processes that consime attentional capactiy
why do individuals with co-morbid anxiety and depression show patterns different to anxiety
motivational deficits
threat evalutation system vs goal engagement mechanisms
when is attentional bias observed in depression
under conditions of elaborative processing of self relevant material
more restricted range of stimuli show attentional bias in depression
longer time durations
when is attnetional bias observed in anxiety
observed for a wide range of emotional cues, negative threat words, pictures of angry faces
can occur automatically ath the pre-attentive stage
does not have to involve elaborative processing
name 5 brain areas associated with attentional bias in anxiety
amygdala thalamus dorsomedial preforntal cortex ventromedial prefrontal cortex subgenual anterior cingulate cortex
explain brain stuff in attneitonal bias and anxiety
neural correlates of threat realted processing in GAD
heightened reactivity in amygdala
arousal in thalamus
negative appraisal in dorsomedial prefonrtal cortex
reduced activity in the ventro-medial prefrontal cortex and the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex - emotion regulation
explain the brain areas associated with attention bias in depression
lateral prefrontal cortex, including the reight inferior frontal gyrus, middle frontal cortex and the supramarginal gyrus
this area is associated with cognitive control
fronto-insular resting state functional connectivity - variability as a function of rumination
mechanisms conclusion
mechanisms critical for developing explanatory frameworks for expaining bias and treatment interventions
are very somplex and interactive
are different for depressiona nd anxiety
need to have paradigms that draw on different theoretical perspectives to unravel how mechanisms operate