Lecture 8 - antisocial behavior Flashcards
1
Q
antisocial behaviour
A
- antisocial behaviour is a kind of atypical development. Involves
> actions damaging to others (violence, theft, damage)
> actions damaging indiv (poor achievement, criminal record) - high prevalence in teenagers (Eaton et al 2006) - 14-18y 19% carried weapon, 30% had their property stolen or damaged, 6% missed school
- often one time thing
2
Q
conduct problems
A
- range of behaviours from mild to serious
- change across development as indiv develops physical strength, cog abilities and sexual maturity
- less severe earlier & more later on as inc opportunities
3
Q
conduct disorder categories in DSM5
A
- ODD(oppositional defiant disorder) - ongoing anger guided disobedience, hostility & defiant to authority beyond normal.
- CD (conduct disorder) - prolonged antsocial behaviour & violations to laws & norms. seen as precursor to aspd (18)
- ODD often precursor for CD
- ODD onset at 6y average, CD onset 9y.
4
Q
diagnosis of ODD DSM5
A
- features: excessive persistent anger, frequent tantrums, disregard for authority
- 6m+ symptoms
- e.g. actions to annoy others, argue, often lose temper
- high comorbidity with adhd & learning disorders
5
Q
diagnosis of CD DSM5
A
- repetitive and persistent pattern of behaviour where the basic rights of others or major age appropriate societal norms or rules are violated
- 3 or more of these in past 12m:
> aggression to people and animals
> destruction of property
> deceitfulness or theft
> violations of rules - these cause significant social, academic or occupational impairments
> child vs adolescent onset
> mild moderate or severe - presence of callous-unemotional (CU) traits or not
- high comorbidity with ADHD (65-90%)
- more serious behaviours than ODD
6
Q
CD associated problems
A
- poor academic achievement
- lower IQ
- truancy
- suspension
- accidents
- risky sexual behaviours
- unplanned pregnancy
- earlier onset of sexual behaviour
- problems in work adjustment
- legal difficulties
- physical injury
- risk of criminal victimisation
- adulthood health problems, occ difficulties, family problems, offending
7
Q
prevalence of ODD and CD
A
- Loeber et al (2000)
> CD: 1.8-16% boys, <1-9% girls
> ODD: 2-15% boys, 1.5-15% girls - costello et al (2003) - both ODD and CD rates stable over ages 9-16
- CD rate 3x for boys than girls, ODD 1.5x
8
Q
antisocial behaviour over the lifespan
A
- ODD and CD defined and diagnosed as disorders of childhood & adolescence (Aspd adult version)
- one source of data is legal data but definitions may differ
9
Q
age crime curve
A
- peak in prevalence and incidence of offended in teenage and early adulthood followed by gradual decline
- does not tell you if people continue to commit crimes or if one off
- Eisner (2003) - huge historical dec in violent crime contrasts with stable age profile of offenders (peak offenders is 20-19). could be explained by adultification of teenagers now
- possible factors: dev physical strength, independence, out of sync with cog and moral development
- limitations: no info on antisocial behaviour, cross sectional
10
Q
early vs late starter model
A
- antisocial behaviour steadily inc at ages prior to crime stats
- peak shows a large number of adolescent limited indivs whose antisocial behaviour does not continue
- there is small sub-pop of life course persistent indivs
- evidence:
> moffitt 1993 - NZ longitudinal assessments. 5% boys had ASB rated above average and very antisocial = life course persistent antisocial behavioir
> in contrast 2/3 remaining boys above average only at some time points = adolescent limited antisocial behavioir. - in teenage years antisocial behaviour inc making the two groups hard to distinguish.
- at 15: BOTH groups had broken 5 laws, but most had broken fewer than 1
11
Q
early vs late starters implications
A
- implications: frameworks for assessment & treatment, predicts prognosis, recognises distinctions
> early starters: usually male, family dysfunction, deficits in verbal ability, deficits in social cognition, adhd, deviant peer
> late starters: lower m:f ratio, less aggression, fewer prior difficulties, more normative peer relationships, poor parental supervision, deviant peer group
12
Q
early vs late starter model update - more than two trajectories?
A
- assessed follow up at 38 & assessed by developmentally appropriate questions at each age
- tested whether pop is made up of 2 or more discrete classes of individuals
- new group: childhood limited - conduct problems in childhood drop away
- Barker & Maughan (2009) - maternal report on if child is high risk based on norms. can get a probability of a high risk child and if they are on track for adolescent onset
13
Q
child biological risk factors (CD, ODD, antisocial behaviour)
A
- genetics
- intergenerational transmission
- neuroanatomy
- neurotransmitters
- other neurochemicals
- ANS underarousal
- prenatal and perinatal problems (alcohol in preg)
- neurotoxins
14
Q
psychosocial risk factors (CD, ODD, antisocial behaviour)
A
- psychosocial factors
- parenting
- assortative mating
- child abuse
- peer effects
- neighbourhood & socioeconomic factors
- life stressors & coping skills
15
Q
child functional risk factors
A
- temperament
- attachment
- neuropsychological functioning
- intelligence
- reading problems
- impulsivity and behavioural inhibition
- social cognition
- sociomoral reasoning
- puberty and adolescent development
16
Q
callous-unemotional traits and antisocial behaviour
A
- dimension of psychopathy in children
- traits: lack of empathy & guilt, unconcerned about school work, does not keep promises, does not show emotions, does not keep friends
- small prop of antisocial children but at high risk of antisocial behaviour
- a specifier for CD. high CU traits is bad, but can still have CD with no CU traits.
17
Q
temperament model of development of conduct problems
A
- callous-unemotional pathway (genetic basis & heritability)
> strong genetic basis
> low emotional reactivity
> punishment insensitivity & reward dominance
> proactive aggression
> violence
> resistant to treatments - hostile-impulsive pathway
> highly reactive to emotional & threatening stimuli
> respond more strongly to provocations in social situations
> hostile attribution bias
> conduct problems associated more strongly with parenting practices
> responsive to parental discipline.