lecture 7 grammar development Flashcards

1
Q

define grammar

A

whole system and structure of a language or of languages in general, usually taken as consisting of syntax and morphology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define syntax

A

arrangement of words and phrases to create well-formed sentences in a language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define morphology

A

the study of the forms of things - combining morphemes to create complex words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define morpheme

A

smallest unit of language that carries meaning
ie free morpheme “cat”
bound morphemes attached to free morphemes - ie ‘cat-s’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

define MLU

A

mean length utterance

the number of morphemes used in a specific time frame

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

MLU in first stage of synactic development (brown)

A
  1. 75

forms: telegraphic and word order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

MLU in second stage of syntactic development (brown)

A
  1. 25

forms: added morphemes ie eat-ing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

MLU in third stage of syntactic development (brown)

A
  1. 75

forms: asking questions, negation/contradiction, and copula (connecting word - ‘is’)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

MLU in fourth stage of synactic development (brown)

A
  1. 50

forms: complex sentences, past tense and third person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

MLU in fifth stage of syntactic development (brown)

A

4.0

further complexity - coordinate nounds and verb phases, include conjunctions ie ‘but’ ‘if’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

do children make grammatical errors

A

utterances tend to be error free - main errors are omission not commission of words which are simplified versions of adult forms and therefore arguably grammatically correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

describe the learning account of grammar acquisition

A

learn language via experience - produce grammatical sentences by imitation and reinforcement
parental approval/disapproval of utterances reinforces child’s use of correct grammatical utterances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the bakers paradox

A

Projection Problem: “What is the functional relation that exists between an arbitrary human being’s early linguistic experience (his ‘primary linguistic data’) and his resulting adult intuitions?”
concerns the acquisition of negative exceptions: How does the learner know that the double object construction is not available to certain verbs
ie John donated a painting to the museum/them.
*John donated the museum/them a painting.
child cannot rely on direct negative feedback. At the same time, the child cannot assume unattested linguistic forms to be ungrammatical in general

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the learnability problem

A

if learn form experience then learning language from a limited set of examples ie via overhearing and being spoken to
- chomsky argues too complicated to learn language fully from simple examples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

describe no negative evidence for bakers paradox

A

learners don’t use negative evidence to acquire their native language - Negative evidence can be
defined as evidence against the grammaticality of some sentence type, that is, evidence that it is ungrammatical
- children dont learn incorrect grammar by beign told they are wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

describe the generalisation problem of language acquisition (learnability problem)

A

children have hypothesised language which does not meet the language target as a whole
assume sentences they head in their environment are the allowed grammatical constructs
generalised their hypothesised language to the target language - language grows from examples in environment which provides understanding of grammar (examples not necessarily good)

17
Q

describe the retreat problem

A

assume all possible grammatical structures are allowed and therefore hypothesised grammar overshoots target - must reduce hypothesised to meet accepted constructs
BUT THIS DOESNT HAPPEN - DONT RETREAT WHEN WRONG

18
Q

what is the language acquisition device

A

that can seem to form grammatically correct sentence without experience may imply that have innate mechanism for for universal understanding of grammatical principles

  • LAD specifies fundamental grammatical principles shared by all languages, therfore ability to acquire lang is innate, domain specific and uniquely human
19
Q

features of LAD

A

universal
nativist
modular
minimal role of experience

20
Q

how does the LAD work

A

principles - universal innate rules about language specific to all languages (can be applied to all instances)
child first applied parameters- based on the language the child hears and then uses the principles to the language
ie is reference to subject necessary in a sentence? yes in french or English, no in Spanish

21
Q

does negative evidence exist

A

no evidence that approval or disapproval contingent on syntax - parents correct only semantic errors

parental recasts are more likely after error ie parent rephrase childs sentence

22
Q

describe direct contrast hypothesis (is negative feedback used?)

A

saxton
child contrast error with parents repetition/recast of their sentence
provide correct forms of childrens utterances

Ie yes he did eat it

23
Q

descibe prompt hypothesis (is negative feedback used?)

A

saxton
neg feedback prompt to switch from erroneous to correct form
- parent requests clarification of their grammar “he did what?” that causes child to shift to correct use

24
Q

stats of specific language impairment

A

7% of 5 year olds

language skill sig below age norm but normal IQ, hearing,, motor etc

25
Q

characteristics of specific language impairment

A

poor vocab - late talker
omission of grammatical morphemes ie “i need go now!
difficulties interpreting subtleties in lang
some articulation problems
delayed lang - likely to link to disability in adulthood

26
Q

incomplete grammatical rule systems (explanation of SLI)

A

SLI genetic imapirment to LAD causing immature grammatical development, inability to induce gramar and reliance on rote learning

27
Q

difficulty processing grammatical morphemes (explanation of SLI)

A

grammar specific processing impairment due to difficulty in perceiving and using low salience/low freq morphemes

28
Q

auditory processing deficit (explanation of SLI)

A

difficulty with processing rapid auditorily presented information - impairment of auditory procesing not specific to language itself

29
Q

generally limited processing ability (explanation of SLI)

A

generalised slowing hypothesis - limited working memory capacity that influences general processing ability but affeects language due to rapidity of development