Lecture 7: Attachment Flashcards

1
Q

The influence of family in emotional development

A
  • Family, especially parents, play a huge role in children’s emotional development
  • Parent’s expression of emotions
    - Indirect influence on emotional development
  • Parent’s reactions to children’s emotions
    • Direct influence on emotional developmen
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Parents’ Expression of Emotions

A
  • Parents’ emotional expression serve as a model of when and how to express emotions
  • Bobo doll study - ex of how kids copy their parents behaviour.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Parents’ lack of emotional expression

A

*Children who grow up with parents that tend to not show emotions tend to:
* Not express emotions themselves
* Learn to see emotions as “bad”
* Have trouble identifying and understanding emotions in self and others
* Struggle with regulating intense emotions (when they have them some of the time)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Parents’ Expressions of Positive Emotion

A
  • Children that grow up with parents that express a high level of positive emotions tend to:
    - Express more positive emotions themselves
    - Be well-adjusted
    - Be socially skilled (bc of ability to express + emotions)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Parents’ Expressions of Negative Emotions

A
  • Children that grow up with parents that express a high level of negative emotions tend to:
    - Have heightened awareness to emotional cues of conflict, if there is frequent conflict at home
    - Experience and express more negative emotions themselves
    - Have poorer emotion regulation skills
    - Be less socially competent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Parents’ Reactions to Children’s Emotions

A

*Parents’ reactions to their children’s emotions directly influence children’s emotional development
- Mirroring
- Emotional coaching

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mirroring

A
  • Behaviours in which a parent reflects the emotions of their child back to them
  • Conveyed through verbal and non-verbal cues (ie: mimicking facial expression)
  • Contingent responding: timely and appropriate reactions (rather than a later response, it needs to be pretty immediate)
  • Characterized by warmth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Examples of Mirroring (depends on how old they are and what is their cognitive development)

A
  • A baby looks upset. The parent also furrows their eyebrows and frown.
  • A child is pouting. The parent says, “You have tears in your eyes. You look sad.”
  • A child feels very anxious about an upcoming test. The parent says “You seem anxious about the test. I sometimes feel the same way when I have a big thing to do at work.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mirroring

A

*Important because:
* Validates and normalizes the child’s emotions (what you are feeling is normal)
* Helps the child identify and understand their emotions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Still-Face Paradigm

A
  • sits and plays with baby (1 year)
  • engage with baby
  • then asks mom not to engange with baby, now the baby is trying to get the mom to engage.
  • uses everything they have to try and get the mom’s attention
  • They become distressed and stressed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Still-Face paradigm

A
  • Lab procedure in which a parent repetitively alternates between being responsive to an infant and not reacting to them
  • Infants quickly become distressed in reaction to still-face and this distress increases with each still-face “episode”
  • Shows that infants are attuned to parents’ emotions and distress when a parent behaves contrary to expectation
evidence that kids are very attuned to parents emotions and they become super distressed when the parent is doing something they dont expect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Implications of Still-Face Paradigm

A
  • Two real-world examples of “still-face”that may interfere with infant emotional development
    • Depressed parents
      - Tend to show less emotional expression when responding to their infants
  • Parents’ frequent cell phone use
    - May distract parents away from responding to infants’ emotional cues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Emotional Coaching

A
  • The use of discussion and other forms of instruction to teach children how to cope with, regulate, and appropriately express emotions (display rules)
  • What is seen as appropriate depends on culture
  • E.g. in East Asian cultures, emotional restraint is more highly valued vs. in Latin American cultures, emotional expression is more highly valued
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Examples of Emotional Coaching

A
  • “You seem anxious about the test. Let’s take a breath and then work through some practice questions so that you feel more prepared.”
  • “I know you’re frustrated that your sister took your toy without asking, but it’ not okay for you to pull her hair. That hurt her. Use your words instead to tell her that you’re frustrated. –> mirroring and coaching
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Importance of Supportive Reaction (miroring + emotional coaching)

A

Supportive/sensitive reactions, characterized by mirroring + emotional coaching, is ideal way to react to children’s emotions:
* Validates child’s emotions
* Helps the child understand their emotions
* Fosters emotional regulation
* Associated with higher self-esteem
* Fosters empathy and social skills
* Associated with better performance in school

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Parents’ Reactions to Children’s Emotions

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Implications of lack of effective emotional reaction

A
  • Children who grow up with parents that habitually provide little/no mirroring and/or little/no emotional coaching tend to be:
    - Less socially competent
    - Less emotionally competent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Why do parents react the way they do

A
  • Cultural differences
    - Emotional expression is more encouraged in North America vs. East Asian cultures
    - Reactions to specific emotions differ by culture (ie: asia use shame as a learning opportunity)
    - E.g. reactions to shame in independent vs. collectivistic cultures
  • Generational differences in norms for emotional expression (expression emotions is becoming more pushed for with each generation)
  • Family reactions to emotions when parents themselves were children
    - Intergenerational transmission of emotional reactions and regulation
  • Mood and emotions in the moment
    - Harder to be supportive if parent is having a bad day
    - Current mood will impact their reaction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Summary

A
  • Emotional development is shaped indirectly through the modelling that parents provide for how they react to their own emotions
  • Parents influence children’s emotional development more directly through their use of mirroring and emotional coaching
  • Still-face paradigm demonstrates that infants become very distressed when parents do not provide them with mirroring
  • Sensitive reactions, characterized by mirroring and emotional coaching, from parents tend to foster good emotion regulation skills, social skills, and overall psychological well-being in children
  • Many different social factors influence which emotions a parent displays and how they react to their children’s emotion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Attachment theory

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

John Bowlby

A
  • Psychoanalyst who studied intense emotional distress of children orphaned during WWII
  • humans have a bunch of physical needs but there were no concept of emotional needs.
  • first to recognize these two things:
    - Distress due to separation from parents and not having emotional needs met
    - Behaviours observed (e.g., crying, clinging, searching) are adaptive responses to separation from an attachment figure (signal that they need to be soothed/co-regulation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Bowlby’s Attachment Theory

A
  • Children and their primary caregiver are biologically predisposed to develop a deep emotional bond (attachment)
  • This bond forms the foundation for a child’s sense of security and thus shapes their emotional and social developme
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Features of Attachment System

A
  1. Secure base
    * Caregiver provides a child with a sense of security from which they can explore the environment
    * Cannot explore the environment if attachment system is activated (because too distressed)
  2. Proximity maintenance and seeking
    * Children are biologically motivated to stay close to caregiver
  3. Separation distress
    * Children become distressed when separated from caregiver or when there is a threat in the environment
    * Activates attachment system, motivating child to seek proximity to caregiver
    * E.g. Looking for caregiver, seeking physical proximity, crying, clinging
  4. Safe haven
    * Caregiver helps manage arousal (and distress) through co-regulation
    * Once proximity and reassurance have been achieved, attachment system deactivates
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Attachment System

A
25
Q

Bowlby’s Attachment Theory

A
  • Children and their primary caregiver are biologically predisposed to develop a deep emotional bond (attachment).
  • This bond forms the foundation for a child’s sense of security and thus shapes their emotional and social development.
  • Quality of child’s attachments are highly dependent on their experiences with caregiver
26
Q

Mary Ainsworth

A
  • Provided empirical evidence of attachment theory by developing the Strange Situation procedure
    - Paradigm designed to systematically assess children’s attachment to a specific caregiv
27
Q

The Strange Situation

A
28
Q

Attachment Styles

A
  • Secure: 60%; Child uses the parent as secure base, is distressed at separation, seeks the parent at reunion and is easily soothed
  • Avoidant: 15%; Readily separates to explore, avoids or ignores the parent when they return after separation, and has no preference for the parent to the stranger (indifferent)
  • Resistant: 10%; Clingy, does not separate to explore; wary of the stranger even when the parent is present, extremely distressed upon separation, but difficult to soothe once the parent comes back or demonstrates anger at the parent (called anxious attachment in adults)
  • Disorganized: Often freezes and dissociates, lack of consistency in behaviour towards parent, demonstrates contradictory responses, e.g., seem to want to approach caregiver but then withdraws and shows fear, generally fearful of the parent (what distinguishes them is that they show fear towards the caregiver)
29
Q

The strange situation

A
30
Q

Legacy of the strange situation

A
  • Attachment styles replicated in several studies
  • Attachment styles are universal across cultures with approximately the same frequencies
  • Remains standard measure of children’s attachment style
  • Attachment styles in Strange Situation strongly correlated with attachment behaviour at home (shows a lot of external validity)
31
Q

Development of attachment

A
  • Pre-attachment phase: birth – 6 weeks
  • Infant display innate behaviours that elicit care from caregivers (e.g. crying, cooing)
  • Do not show a clear preference for a specific caregiver, accept care from multiple adults
  • Attachment-in-the-making phase: 6 weeks – 6 months
    • Start to distinguish between familiar and unfamiliar people, preferring to receive care from a familiar person, but infants still open to care from strangers (starting to show a preference but still easily soothed)
    • Don’t show separation distress when separated from a parent (6 months is absolute earliest they will show seperation distress)

Clear-cut attachment phase: 6 months –18-24 months
- Infants display clear attachment behaviours and a preference for a primary caregiver
- Separation distress is evident and fear of strangers emerges

Formation of reciprocal relationships: 24 months +
* Interested in creating bonds with others that are not their primary attachment figure
* Are better able to tolerate distress that comes with separat

32
Q

Implications

A
  • A baby’s age influences their attachment behaviours
  • Attachment seems to follow somewhat of a “sensitive period”
    • E.g. Evidence from Romanian orphanage
33
Q

The Case of Romanian Orphanages

A
  • During the Cold War, many Romanian orphanages were characterized by profound neglect (very underfunded)
    - Children in these orphanages were unable to form a primary attachment relationship
  • The extent of negative effects of these experiences depended on how long children had spent in the orphanage
    • If adopted after 6 months, were much more likely to show profound, lasting cognitive, emotional, and social problems
    • If adopted before 6 months, more likely to show typical development
  • Suggests that 0-6 months is the sensitive period for the development of attachment –> this is why we prioritize putting kids in foster care before orphenages = two people dedicated to taking care of the child.
34
Q

Parenting Influences on Attachment style

A
35
Q

Parents of Securely Attached Children

A
  • Parents’ behaviour:
    - Consistently available and responds promptly to infant’s cues (dependable)
    - Generally supportive/sensitive reactions to child
    - Engages in frequent positive exchanges with the child
  • Child learns that:
    • Proximity seeking is a good strategy to soothe distress
    • Can rely on the caregiver for comfort
36
Q

Attachment system

A
37
Q

Parents of Avoidantly Attached Children

A

Parents’ behaviour:
* Unavailable and insensitive to the child’s cues
* Tends to ignore, dismiss, reject, or criticize

Child learns that:
* Proximity seeking is not a good strategy to soothe distress

38
Q

Parents of Avoidantly Attached Children

A

Parents’ behaviour:
* Consistently insensitive to the child’s signals
* Avoids close contact or rejects child’s bids for contact
* May be angry or impatient

Child learns that:
* Proximity seeking is not a good strategy to soothe distress
* “Deactivates” attachment system
- Avoid proximity of caregiver when distressed
- Cope with distress by hiding it or avoiding situations that elicit distress (heart rate in these kids is elevated compared to kids that are showing seperation distress, but they are not showing their distress –> so at age 12-18months old they’ve already learned to not show when they are distressed).
* BUT biological signs of stress when separated from caregiver

39
Q

Parents of Resistantly Attached Children

A

Parents’ behaviour:
* Response to child’s distress is inconsistent and unpredictable (sometimes they are sensitive and supportive and sometimes they aren’t…super unpredictable)
* Often anxious or overwhelmed with caregiving

Child learns that:
* Proximity is sometimes a good strategy to soothe distress
* “Hyperactivates” attachment system
* Hypervigilance to threat
* Cope with distress by heightening it and amplifying it (they learn that its not working but if they amp it out maybe it will work).
* Crying louder, throwing a tantrum, clinging

40
Q

Parents of Children with Disorganized Attachment

A
  • Parents’ behaviour:
    • Confuses or frightens child
    • Correlated with harsh, abusive, or neglectful parenting
    • Often struggle with severe mental health issues (usually have trauma)
  • Child learns that:
    • Proximity seeking often results in feeling scared
    • Caregiver is extremely unpredictable and cannot be trusted
    • Isn’t learning a lot about how to regulate emotions
41
Q

Reactions to The Strange Situation

A
42
Q

Temperament Influences
on Attachment Style

A
43
Q
  1. Temperament and Genetics
A
  • Temperament influences attachment behaviours
    - E.g. Proneness-to-distress is positively associated with degree of distress during separations
    - A child that is hogh on this dimension (prone to distress) are more likely to develop either a resistant attachment style or maybe secure. But very unlikely to develop avoidant attachment style because they are prone to distress.
    - A child that is low in distress dimension = less likely to develop resistant attachment.
  • Temperament also influences the degree of responsiveness from a caregiver
    • E.g., very fussy babies that are difficult to soothe may make a caregiver feel helpless and be less responsive to the baby’s needs
  • No evidence that specific genes are related to attachment styles
  • BUT evidence for differential susceptibility
44
Q

Differential Susceptibility Hypothesis

A
  • Some children are temperamentally, highly sensitive to both negative AND positive environmental conditions
  • “sensitive” temperament+ negative parenting experiences = negative outcomes
  • “sensitive” temperament + positive parenting experiences = positive outcomes
45
Q

“Dandelions and Orchids”

A

Dandelion: some kids are like dandelion…they are resilient
Orchids: small portion of people or kids that are more sensitive. Need perfect and adequate conditions

46
Q

E.g. Negativity and Childcare

A
  • Children with more difficult/negative temperaments have:
    • More behavioural problems if raised with low quality childcare
    • BUT have the lowest levels of behavioural problems if raised with high quality childcare
dotted line = not statistically relevant. kids that are not temperament (dandelion kids), no effect. Doesnt really matter if they have good or bad parenting
47
Q
A

answer: olivia

48
Q

Differential Susceptibility and Attachment

A
  • Study: Conducted in Ukrainian preschoolers

Examined relationship between:
* Attachment
* Caregiving environment
- Raised in orphanage or with family
* Variations in serotonin transporter gene (which influences how much serotonin there is circulating serotonin there is in our system)
- S allele (vs. L allele) associated with greater reactivity to stress (SS, LL or LS): short allele is associated with a greater biological reactivity to stress (SS or LS)
- Biological marker of greater sensitivity to environment

49
Q

Genetic Differential Susceptibility (results)

A

Results: Children with at least one S allele (vs. 2 L alleles) showed:
* More attachment disorganization if raised in institution
* BUT less attachment disorganization if raised with family
* Suggests that genes related to environmental sensitivity and
parenting work together to affect vulnerability to insecure
attachment

long allele: regardless of what their environment is, they are resilient short allele: their environment mattered. if raised in orphanage they showed high levels of attachment disorganization. If they were raised with the family, they showed comparable levels of attachment disorganization to the kids with two copies of long allele.
50
Q

Implications of Differential Susceptibility

A
  • Caregiving experiences and temperament jointly shape a child’s attachment and behavioural outcomes
  • While all kids benefit most from sensitive parenting, it is particularly important for children that are more temperamentally sensitive to their environment (orchids)
  • parenting type matters regardless of dandelion or orchids
51
Q

Implications of attachment

A
52
Q

Benefits of secure attachment

A
  • Children that are securely attached vs. insecurely attached: secure attachment is considered the best
    - Are more emotionally expressive (in appropriate ways)
    - Experience more positive emotion
    - Are less anxious and depressed
    - Are less likely to have behavioural problems, like aggression and delinquency
    - Have closer relationships with peers
    - Show more empathy and helping behaviour
    - Are more socially competent in general
    - Do better in school
    - Have more positive romantic experiences in adolescence and adulthoodOverall, better psychologically, social skills and better academically
53
Q

One Secure Attachment is Enough

A
  • Having at least one secure attachment seems to buffer against the negative effects of insecure attachment (can have different attachment styles with different parents)
    - Children with insecure attachment to both parents had more behaviour problems than children with insecure attachment to just one parent
kids securely attacged to moms = low level of behavior problems. if securely attached to one parent = low level of behaviour problems but if they have none = more behavioural problems.
54
Q

Internal Working Models

A
  • Mental representations of the self, of attachment figures, and of relationships in general
  • Constructed as a result of experiences with caregivers
  • Once constructed,
    - Act as a filter through which interactions with the caregiver and other attachment figures are interpreted
    - Guide expectations and behaviours in relationships throughout life

A childs attachement style is going to shape these internal working models into adolescence and adulthood. and a kids attachement style is heavily influence by their parents experiences.

55
Q

Model of others

A

Assessed against two dimensions. Crossing these 2 dimensions form 4 attachment styles.

56
Q

Attachment from Infancy to Adulthood

A
  • Do caregiving experiences in childhood actually predict adult
    attachment style?
  • Method: Longitudinal study of 707 participants from childhood to
    age 18
  • Assessed quality of caregiving experiences at various points in childhood:
  • Maternal sensitivity
  • Maternal depression
  • Father absence
  • Assessed adult attachment style at age 18
57
Q

Attachment from Infancy to Adulthood

A

Results: Less supportive parenting and family instability predicted
attachment insecurity in adulthood

Avoidance at age 18 predicted by:
* Lower maternal sensitivity
* Not consistently living with father

Anxiety at age 18 predicted by:
* Higher maternal depression
* Evidence that there’s an association between childhood caregiving experiences and attachment in adulthood

58
Q

Summary

A
  • According to Bowlby, attachment is biologically based and rooted in evolution
  • Using the Strange Situation, children can be classified into 4 attachment styles: secure, avoidant, resistant, disorganized
  • Attachment follows a predictable developmental timeline and there seems to be a sensitive period for its development wherein a child needs to develop a primary attachment relationship by 6 months
  • Attachment styles are shaped by experiences with caregivers
  • Secure attachment is associated with sensitive, responsive parenting
  • But, research also shows that children are differentially susceptible to parenting
  • Attachment style has a profound impact on children’s social and emotional development
    Secure attachment is associated with many positive outcomes The quality of children’s attachments shape their internal working models which guide their expectations and behaviours in relationships throughout life
59
Q

Summary Emotional Development 2 + attachment

A

Temperament
* Temperament can be conceptualized categorically and dimensionally
* 5 dimensions: positivity, activity level, distress, fear, attention span
* Temperament is largely stable because reflects the operation of genetics

The influence of parents on emotional development
* Parents directly inflence a child’s emotional experience via mirroring + emotional coaching
* Parents indirectly influence kids emotional experiences via their modelling of how they handle their own emotions
* Sensitive parenting = high mirroring + emotion coaching

Attachment:
* Strange situation is used to assess attachment styles
* 4 attachment styles: secure, disorganized, avoidant, resistant
* Attachment style is shaped by caregiving experiences
- Attentive and responsive –> secure (separation distress and are relatively easily soothed when the parent comes back)
- Parent is unpredicatable in their responsiveness –> resistant (highly distressed when seperated and are difficult to soothe)
- Abusive and frightening parenting –> disorganized (frightened of the caregiver and look disoriented)
- Consistently insensitive parenting –> avoidant (ignore the parent/indifferent to the parent)

  • Temperament also shapes attachment
  • Differential susceptibility; some kids are more sensitive to their encironment, for better and for worse.