Lecture 7: Arousal & Anxiety Flashcards

1
Q

explain the Consensual Modal Model

A
  • In this model, an emotion develops over time, triggered by a situation that initiates an evaluation (or appraisal) process by the person.
  • Depending on how the situation is evaluated, a complex emotional reaction develops, which has a physiological and behavioural component in addition to the subjective experience.
  • This reaction can in turn be the basis for the next emotional episode, but it also has other effects on the behavioural and physiological level.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is arousal

A

Refers to the more general level of activation of the organism, characterized by the energy of the autonomous nervous system and related to the processing of afferent information (i.e. the perception of stimuli).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the difference between trait and state anxiety

A

State anxiety is a momentary and temporary feeling, while trait anxiety expresses the general tendency to experience anxiety in different situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

explain the sport psychological approach to anxiety (Hackfort)

A

People in competitive sports are particularly concerned about the uncertainty of the situation. This feeling of uncertainty manifests in four types of fear:
(1) fear of failure
(2) the unknown,
(3) negative social evaluation
(4) injury or physical harm

The openness of the outcome of competition leads to anxiety because both success and failure are possible, and because the outcome is only partly under your control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are 4 social-psychological factors that may have an influence on anxiety/arousal

A
  1. Audience effects; performing in front of a supportive audience increases the pressure to perform and leads to a decrease in accuracy performance
  2. Contingencies; rewards or punishments are usually contingent on performance and can lead to perceptions of pressure
  3. Competition; formal or informal competition leads to the perception of pressure and often to worse performance
  4. Importance of the event; the more important an event is perceived to be, the more pressure to perform and the more anxiety; specifically if it is closely related to a persons self-esteem
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are 2 kinds of processes that lead to anxiety in sport and explain them

A
  1. Attention processes; anxiety/pressure can lead to a distortion of both top-down (consciously directed attention) and bottom-up (automatically attracted attention) processes
  2. Appraisal processes; characteristics of a situation are assessed in terms of their meaning for the person, and in the case of anxiety, the situation is appraised as threatening
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

explain the Transactional Stress Model (in relation to appraisal processes)

A
  • There is a bidirectional/transactional relationship between the individual and the situation/environment, in which cognitive processes mediate whether (subjective) stress is actually triggered by an (objective) stressor
  • These cognitive processes should essentially be about appraising the significance and characteristics of the situation and events in this transactional relationship
  • This appraisal includes how significant the situation is for a person (primary appraisal) and whether the individual has the resources to cope with the demands of the situation (secondary appraisal)
  • Situational demand and resource appraisal in competition lead to the existence and the intensity of anxiety
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

explain Quiet Eye (QE)

A

= the last fixation of an eye movement before the start of the final movement; these periods lead to better motor performance due to effective motor programming
–> the longer the QE, the better the performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

explain the anxiety response in sport in terms of 3 components

A
  1. Experiential component; makes up the “feeling” and its accompanying thoughts, its the level of reaction that probably has the fundamental meaning for the person (its usually in the forefront)
    - emotionality/somatic anxiety = anxious arousal; the subjective perception of bodily experiences
    - worry/cognitive anxiety = anxious apprehension; cognitive component of anxiety; worry, apprehensions and thought loops
  2. Physiological component; emotions are accompanied with activation states of the body (changes in physiological systems)
    Physiological indicators of anxiety:
    - respiratory-cardiovascular
    - electrophysiological
    - biochemical changes
  3. Behavioural component; comprises
    - expressive behaviour = submissive or rushed behaviour gives the impression that someone is experiencing anxiety; tends to lead to worse outcomes
    - information processing = altered attention and decision-making processes lead to changes in behaviour; anxiety is expressed in the fact that distracting thoughts are harder to control and the focus of attention is directed to threat-relevant stimuli
    –> attention processes can be inferred by recording eye movements (anxiety effects the duration of the QE and the number of fixations)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

explain the Attentional Control Theory (ACT)

A
  • Anxiety reduces information processing efficiency but doesn’t always affect performance, as effort and motivation can compensate.
  • ACT distinguishes between proactive (top-down) control (intentional focus) and reactive (bottom-up) control (automatic response to stimuli)
  • Under pressure, proactive control is disrupted, leading to more distractions and impaired focus.
  • ACT for Sports highlights that in sports, anxiety arises from distorted attention control and misinterpreting stimuli (e.g., spectators as threats).
  • This anxiety increases error monitoring, creating a vicious cycle of anxiety and performance errors.
  • Attention control only breaks down under high anxiety, requiring special motivation or self-control to overcome.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are 4 theories to explain the link between anxiety and athletic performance

A
  1. Drive theory (Hull, Spence) = a motivation theory which assumes that energy activation of the organism occurs when especially primary and thus mostly physiological needs are threatened or unstable (so-called drive). With increasing
    drive, the activation (“arousal”) also increases, which in turn increases effort, emotions and motivation. The greater the drive or activation, the better the sporting performance should be.
    2.Inverted-U Hypothesis = initially positive effect of increased (anxiety-related) activation but, rather than linear, an inverted U-shaped connection between anxiety (activation) and performance;
    - when activation increases, (athletic) performance also increases until an optimal activation level is reached
    - once the optimal activation level is reached, however, a further increase in activation leads to decreased performance.
    - This means that moderate activation levels
    create optimal performance.
  2. Multidimensional Anxiety Theory = somatic and cognitive anxiety have differential effects on anxiety, and self-confidence has a moderating influence on the anxiety-performance relationship
    - Cognitive anxiety; performance decreases with an increase in cognitive anxiety because essential resources are consumed by cognitive anxiety and therefore no further attention capacity is available to support task performance
    - Somatic anxiety; the relationship between somatic anxiety and performance has an inverted-U relationship, whereby optimal performance can be expected with moderate somatic anxiety
  3. Cusp Catastrophe Theory = predicts that when cognitive anxiety is low, the relationship between physiological activation (arousal) and performance changes depending on the level of cognitive anxiety; assumes an inverted-U shape between arousal and performance
    –> increase in arousal beyond the optimal point of performance leads to “catastrophe”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

explain optimal performance

A

= characterized by the direction of attentional focus towards task-related information and simultaneous ignoring of irrelevant information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

explain distraction in the context of choking under pressure

A

Distraction models of choking show that athletes are more easily distracted by task-irrelevant information when their anxiety increases; Choking occurs mainly because the processing of task-irrelevant information exceeds a certain level of attention capacity and thus reduces the potential space of attention that would be necessary for optimal performance
–> anxiety might impair working memory functions; as a result, more task-irrelevant internal and external stimuli are processed, and the capacity of working memory decreases further

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

explain movement focused attention in the context of choking under pressure

A

Self-focus models assume that choking occurs because attention is focused on the execution of movement when anxiety increases; conscious observation or even conscious execution of movements should then interfere with the otherwise automatic execution of movements and lead to choking under pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

explain environmental/personal characteristics as moderators in the context of choking under pressure

A

People differ in their inclination to certain attention of information processing processes, especially when under pressure;
- some individuals have a predisposition to focus on the execution of movement –> related to failure
- state-oriented people tend to maintain cognitive, affective and attention-related states (eg. to ruminate) even if this is accompanied by impaired performance; whereas action-oriented people are able to change these states in order to optimize their performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

explain 3 other effects of anxiety in sports

A
  • anxiety in the form of concerns about one’s appearance can lead to both increased or decreased physical activity
  • Sensation-seekers—people in search of unusual, intense experiences—increase their anxiety experiences through risky behaviour; anxiety is perceived as pleasant
  • for many people who practice dangerous outdoor sports, the focus is not on the anxiety experience but on coping with anxiety—which then also leads to preventive safety behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

from what two temporal perspectives can managing anxiety be viewed and explain them (in the context of coping with anxiety)

A
  1. Anticipation; anxiety often arises in anticipation and is an expression of the perception of a threat from a future situation
  2. Compensation; temporally prior to an event, it is primarily about managing the situation and preventing the feeling of anxiety from arising in the first place; compensatory strategies are also necessary if anxiety is to be regulated in a situation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what are two forms of avoidance coping

A
  • Problem-focused coping with anxiety tries to directly change the situation or behaviour
  • Emotion-focused coping attempts to alleviate the stress and its associated experiences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what are the 3 factors of the three-factorial system of coping (in the context of coping with anxiety)

A
  1. Mastery coping = includes all attempts to bring the situation under control and/or to remove the stress or anxiety trigger. This includes, for example, methods of goal-setting or targeted preparation
  2. Internal regulation = attempts to control the internal, psychological and physiological stress or anxiety reaction, for example, by relaxing or blocking out the environment with a towel
  3. Goal withdrawal = aims at overcoming stress and anxiety by not pursuing the goal of the action or by lowering expectations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

explain self-handicapping in the context of coping with anxiety

A

= any action or choice of performance setting that enhances the opportunity to externalize (or excuse) failure and to internalize (reasonably accept credit for) success

21
Q

what are 2 ways of regulating anxiety in sports

A
  1. Aim at the prevention of anxiety (“antecedent-focused”)
  2. Change the experience and the anxiety reaction (“response-focused”):
    - Avoiding or changing the situation before a competition
    - Focusing attention on less anxiety-inducing stimuli
    - Reappraising of the situation
    - Changing the emotional response, for example, through relaxation exercises or routines
22
Q

give an overview of the Theory of Challenge and Threat States in Athletes (TCTSA)

A

4 Key components:
1. Demand appraisals and motivational states; for challenge and threat states to occur, the athlete must perceive the demands of a situation as dangerous, uncertain and requiring effort (motivational state = a situation in which there is pressure on the athlete to perform)
2. Resource appraisals; self-efficacy, perceptions of control and achievement goals
- challenge state: high self-efficacy, high perception of control, and focus on approach goals (sufficient resources to deal with demands of situation)
- threat state: low self-efficacy and control, and focus on avoidance goals
3. Physiological responses;
- challenge state: increased sympathetic-adreno-medullary (SAM) –> coordinated cardiovascular response
- threat state: increased SAM activity is accompanied by increased pituitary-adreno-cortical (PAC) and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis activity, and subsequent cortisol release
4. Emotional consequences; positive emotions are typically associated with a challenge state, and negative emotions with a threat state

23
Q

explain how social support can work as a moderator of the effects of stressors on outcomes

A

Perceived social support aids the appraisal process by redefining the situational threat and augmenting the individual’s perceived control and ability to cope

24
Q

what are 4 suggestions for future research (based on the TCTSA article)

A
  1. Measurement Tools: Emphasizes the need for standardized procedures in measuring physiological responses related to challenge and threat states.
  2. Transparency in Reporting: Encourages clear reporting of physiological data, including the duration and time course of measurements.
  3. Reconsideration of Resources: Suggests exploring the role of social support and other resources in managing challenge and threat states.
  4. Behavioral Outcomes: Recommends investigating decision-making processes and their relationship with challenge and threat states.
25
Q

explain the Cognitive Motivational Relational Theory (CMRT) by Lazarus

A

Stress results from individual evaluation and appraisal of demands they face in relation to themselves and their environment
- primary appraisal = whether a threat, harm/loss, benefit, or challenge is to be experienced; whether demands are likely to be stressful
- secondary appraisal = whether the individual themselves possesses the necessary physical and mental resources to deal with the stress and the likely outcomes that will ensue; attribution of blame or credit for an outcome, coping potention (can you remove/deal with the threat), future expectations (change the current situation for the better/worse)
–> threat is experienced when resources are perceived insufficient to meet the demands of the situation

26
Q

what are 3 things that primary appraisal depends on

A
  • Goal relevance: Judgment if transaction is significant to your goals and well-being, “is something at stake?”
  • Goal congruence: Will the situation facilitate or prevent the achievement of a goal? “is stimulus harmful or beneficial?”
  • _ Type of ego involvement_: Type of personal goal relevant to the situation; Social and self-esteem, moral values, ego ideals, meanings and ideas, others persons and their well-being, and life goals; “What is at stake?”
27
Q

what are 3 kinds of causes of stress

A
  1. competitive stressors
  2. organization stressors (eg. interpersonal demands, performer’s role in the organization)
  3. personal stressors (eg. lifestyle, financial demands)
28
Q

explain bracing

A

Also called **double pull*, this is when a muscle tenses up due to worry and anxiety, it contracts or is shortened. This is due to the voluntary muscles in humans being arranged in pairs. When a muscle tightens because of perceived stress, its opposite sets up a counter tension to hold the segment of the body in place. The resulting double pull can build up formidable heights of tension over much of the body, yet most people will not identify it. This double pull explains why a person can be scared stiff and rigid with anger or unable to move because of fright.

29
Q

explain differential relaxation

A

When excessive muscular tension occurs, it interferes with execution of the skill because it prevents appropriately coordinating movement. Proper form in a movement involves using just the right amount of tension at any given time in the relevant muscles. Athletes can learn the right amount of contraction, that is, to expend only those energies necessary to execute the skill.

30
Q

explain competitive anxiety

A

situation-specific, negative (unpleasant) emotional response to one’s view of competitive stressors, and the general involvement in competition, as threats
–> worry, heightened perception of physiological state and levels of arousal

31
Q

what is important when it comes to appraisal of anxiety symptoms

A

whether athletes interpret their anxiety symptoms as having a facilitative or debilitative effect on their performance

32
Q

what are 4 types of immediate responses of coaches in relation to the demands that they experience in their roles and explain their effect

A
  1. cognitive; e.g., negative thoughts, maladaptive attributions, loss of focus, making negative decisions
  2. affective; e.g., emotions such as anger and anxiety, becoming “moodier”
  3. physiological; e.g., tension, increased heart rate, shaking
  4. behavioral; e.g., sharper tone of voice and agitated body language
    –> although some positive responses are highlighted, most have been suggested to have a negative effect on coaching style, quality of coaching and relations with athletes
33
Q

explain the difference between trait anxiety and state anxiety

A

Trait anxiety is a general predisposition to respond across many situations with high levels of anxiety because of typically appraising situations as threatening.
State anxiety is more specific; it varies from moment to moment and fluctuates proportionately to the perceived threat of a situation.

34
Q

explain the Individual Zones of Optimal Functioning (IZOF) hypothesis

A

A practical tool for helping athletes establish the level (i.e., intensity) of emotions experienced (e.g., pre- performance anxiety, excitement, anger) within which the best performance occurs (often referred to as “being in the zone”). If the intensity of these emotions is outside of the “optimal” zone or range, performance will suffer. There is inter-individual and intra-individual variability in how athletes subjectively perceive their emotions in relation to their impact on performance (facilitative or debilitative).

35
Q

what are 3 mechanistic explanations for the relationship between stress and performance

A
  1. Processing efficiency theory (PET): suggests that when a person is anxious, a proportion of their attentional capacity for the task is filled by task-irrelevant cognitive worry, effectively reducing their working memory capacity, impairing cognitive processing efficiency, and, potentially, performance; cognitive anxiety or worry may also signal the importance of the task to the individual and lead to an increased investment in the task
  2. Attentional control theory (ACT): extension to PET; anxiety impairs the efficiency of attention because it causes a shift in attention to threat-related stimuli rather than toward task- and goal-relevant stimuli. The inability to exercise attentional control may be compensated for by inhibition and shifting functions that stop the effect of the threat-related stimuli and shift attentional resources to task demands. Therefore, while anxiety influences efficiency (the relationship between effective task performance and the use of attentional resources), it does not influence effectiveness (outcome in terms of performance accuracy).
  3. Conscious processing hypothesis (CPH): an anxious performer starts to use excessive thinking (reinvestment), which leads to the execution of skills with an inward attention that in turn can lead to a failure to execute the skill successfully , a process that is commonly referred to as paralysis by analysis. That is, skills that are normally undertaken with little or no thought become disrupted due to the skilled athlete trying to “consciously” control the movement.
36
Q

explain 3 emotion-focused approaches and 1 problem-focused approach for sport psychology consultants based on the models explaining the relationship between stress and performance

A
  1. Reduction appraoch: The first perspective is that when elevated arousal and competitive anxiety have a detrimental effect on performance, a reduction approach is required to reduce the symptoms associated with stress.
  2. Restructuring approach: The second perspective is based on the principle that high levels of anxiety and arousal associated with a stress experience need not be detrimental, but may be interpreted in a positive way that actually benefits performance. This notion is fundamental to the restructuring approach, in which athletes are taught to restructure interpretations of symptoms from a negative to a positive viewpoint.
  3. Energizing approach: The third perspective describes circumstances whereby athletes possess an insufficient activation state in relation to their sporting task or activity (i.e., underarousal). Here, sport psychology consultants take an energizing approach—that is, they try to enhance performance by using interventions that increase arousal.
  4. Prevention approach: The fourth perspective entails trying to prevent or manage the stressful demands (stressors) the individual experiences.
37
Q

explain the difference between arousal and activation

A

Arousal = Cognitive and physiological activation of the person, varying from deep sleep to extreme excitement; arousal is about responses to changes in the situation – and this could influence activation; autonomic nervous system responses – increased heart rate, butterflies in the stomach, muscle tension; immediate responses to new stimuli or input
Activation = Cognitive and physiological activity that is geared towards preparing a planned response to some anticipated situation
- ANTICIPATION = readiness to respond

38
Q

what is the difference between somatic anxiety and cognitive anxiety

A

Cognitive anxiety = Mental component; thoughts experienced in stressful situations
Somatic anxiety = Physical component; perceptions of physiological arousal state in stressful situations

39
Q

what are 5 criticisms for the inverted-U theory

A
  1. Too simplistic
  2. Type of sport and the required motor skills; within sports there are different motor skills
  3. High levels of arousal do not mean high levels of negative emotions per se
  4. Does not consider cognitive anxiety and interaction with arousal
  5. Ignores the information-processing demands of tasks
40
Q

what are 3 criticisms of the multidimensional anxiety theory

A
  1. How can multidimensional anxiety theory explain sudden drops in performance
  2. How do cognitive and somatic anxiety interact
  3. A positive relationship between cognitive anxiety and performance can exist - doesn’t account for this
41
Q

explain challenges states and threat states

A

Challenges states = Sufficient or nearly sufficient perceived available resources to cope with the demands of the situation
Threat states = Not enough perceived available resources to cope with the demands of the situation

42
Q

what are 4 physiological changes in challenge vs threat states

A

Challenge; lower Total Peripheral Resistance (TPR) reactivity, higher Cardiac Output (CO) reactivity
Threat; higher Total Peripheral Resistance (TPR) reactivity, lower Cardiac Output (CO) reactivity
Both; higher heart rate, attenuated PEP

43
Q

what are 3 other physiological consequences of demand appraisals

A
  1. Sympathetic nervous system activity
  2. Increased sympathetic adreno-medullary (SAM) activity relates to increases in norepinephrine, epinephrine
    - SAM activity alone relates to a
    challenge state
  3. Increased pituitary adreno-cortical (PAC) activity relates to increases in cortisol
    - PAC system and SAM activity relates to a threat state
44
Q

what are 3 cognitive consequences of challenge vs threat states and what combinations lead to them

A
  1. Self-efficacy:
    - Belief in our ability to succeed in a particular situation/task
  2. Perceived control
    - The extent to which an individual believes that the situation is within their control
  3. Approach/avoidance goals
    -Achieving a positive outcome (want to improve PB)
    - Avoiding a negative outcome (don’t want to perform worse than in the last match)
    Challenge state: high self-efficacy, high perceived control, approach focus
    Threat state: low self-efficacy, low perceived control, avoidance focus
45
Q

explain what emotional consequences are generally related to challenge/threat states

A

Positive emotions will typically be associated with a challenge response and negative emotions will typically be associated with a threat response.

46
Q

explain what the performance consequences are for challenge vs threat states

A

The TCTSA is primarily about athletes’ preparedness for competition however it may have some performance consequences.
challenge –> increased performance
threat –> decreased performance

47
Q

what 4 things do we know about the effect of interventions on anxiety

A
  1. Small to medium effect of psychological interventions on competitive anxiety.
  2. Finding robust regardless of various intervention and participant characteristics.
  3. Effects of intervention greater for higher level athletes than lower level athletes.
  4. Interventions effective for different intensity subscales of the CSAI-2/2R.
48
Q

what are two reduction techniques for stress management

A
  1. Diaphragmatic breathing:
    - Pushing abdomen out and create a vacuum in longs
    - Breathing properly aids relaxation and increases the amount of oxygen in the blood
    - Facilitates removal of waste products by carrying more energy to the muscles
    - Focus on relaxing muscles, imagine tension gradually draining from bodies
  2. Progressive muscular relaxation:
    - Alternating tension (contraction phase) and relaxation of major muscle groups
    - Contraction phase teaches awareness of how absence of tension can feel
    - Start to recognise unwanted tension