Lecture 7: Alzheimer’s Disease 2 Flashcards
Alzheimer’s disease
Executive Functions (EF)
- Impairments of EF common in AD
- already in early stage
- impaired relative to HC on set shifting, flexibility (e.g. WCST), planning (e.g. ToL), inhibition (e.g. Stroop)
Executive functions
- Stroop in AD (Bondi et al., 2002)
Stroop in AD (Bondi et al., 2002)
- 51 healthy controls, 59 probable AD
- AD - more errors word reading, color reading, color-word reading trials
- AD - interference score impaired (CW/C)
- No difference mild, moderate AD subgroups (Dementia Rating Scale)
- mild AD already degree psychomotor slowing and inhibitory deficit
Executive Functions in Alzheimer Disease: A Systematic Review (Guarino et al., 2019).
- Stroop – most consistently impaired
- Accuracy
- RTs
- Interference
AD very mild (MMSE 26) – moderate (MMSE 16)
- WCST – deficits inconsistent
- problem with task difficulty
- floor effect
- Flanker – no consistent group differences
- Go-NoGo – majority studies no difference
AD: MMSE 18 - 25
Language Impairments (AD) early vs later stage:
- Most language related capabilities intact in early stage but impaired in later stage
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2bfc/d2bfc1c2d9998907b459d8ae97adcec5ce765de3" alt=""
Visuospatial abilities in AD:
Visual Search (Foster et al., 1999):
Mental Rotation (Lineweaver et al., 2005):
- Impairments typically mild in early stage
- severe impairments as disease progresses
- loss of orientation – lost in familiar surroundings, even their own home
- Visual search: feature (single feature) vs conjunction (two features) search:
- AD slower than HC, even in feature search
- impairment more severe in more advanced AD
- Mental rotation
- AD slower to respond (mentally rotate)
- Accuracy lower in AD patients, greater decline with increasing angles
Visuospatial abilities in AD:
Clock drawing (Rouleau et al., 1992):
Clock drawing
- Draw clock from memory, copy clock
- Errors AD mainly conceptual errors, e.g.
- drawing clock without numbers or without hands
- setting time (10 past 11) incorrectly (Rouleau et al., 1992)
- Clock drawing errors in AD
- Conceptual errors - deficit accessing knowledge
- danger with using it for screening is that often healthy elderly have difficulties with this task (but much larger in AD)
Visuospatial abilities
¨Posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) – associated with AD:
Posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) – associated with AD
- Predominantly AD pathology in posterior cortical regions: posterior parietal, occipital
- visual variant AD
- visual functions impaired, e.g. reading, object recognition (visual agnosia)
- relatively preserved memory and language
- Prevalence PCA unknown – 5% in sample 523 AD patients
- Onset PCA earlier than typical amnestic AD, in 50s or 60s
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae4ce/ae4ce4f0ebd13ffb1a686a74cbdcd3d0f76a2083" alt=""
Neuropsychological change
Typical pattern memory and EF impairments in early stage AD:
(Weintraub et al., 2012)
Typical pattern memory and EF impairments in early stage AD
- with progression more functions affected
- pattern impairments less distinct from other forms dementia
- early stage dementia seems to impact memory the most compared to other functions like behavioural ones
(Picture: the larger the black bar the more severe the impairment)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4114d/4114d28c3ff03102e88ecc82395260bc93499bba" alt=""
Severity and profile of cognitive impairments varies with age at diagnosis. AD.
(Salmon & Bondi, 2009)
- Severity and profile of cognitive impairments varies with age at diagnosis.
- someone diagnosed below 70 mostly impaired in memory and EF, those above 80 all functions are imapaired to a similiar degree
- patients are compared relative to healthy individuals of the same age
- Different form AD?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33a52/33a52218374df463a551df3817010c42eba12178" alt=""
Sex differences in AD:
Cognitive impairments.
Sex differences in AD:
- AD more prevalent in women
- Cognitive impairments more severe in women with AD
- Laws et al. (2018) review 298 articles:
- Women with AD < men with AD
- episodic memory, semantic memory, verbal abilities, visual spatial functions
- Effect sizes small (d= 0.2)
Sex differences in AD
- AD more prevalent in women, possible causes:
Genetic – APOE4 (Mielke et al., 2014)
- Single APOE 4 allele: women 4X higher risk AD, men little increased risk
- Autopsy study: plaques and tangles most prevalent in female APOE 4 carriers
Hormones – changes in oestrogen levels
- Hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) in mid life can reduce risk AD ( although evidence not consistent)
- HRT after menopause can increase risk AD
Cognitive reserve
- Persons with more CR greater capacity to cope with brain pathology
- Education and occupation important factors CR
Early cognitive predictors AD
- Episodic memory disturbances years before diagnosis:
- Delayed recall CVLT performance in healthy older adults predictor of subsequent progression to AD (Bondi et al, 1999)
- Memory performance poorer in persons converting to AD 3 years later
- learning score CVLT ( California Verbal Learning Test) distinguished normal group (controls), MCI (questionable) and converters (MCI converted to probable AD (Albert et al., 2001)
- poorer episodic memory than persons who remained cognitively healthy 6 years before diagnosis (Bäckman et al., 2001)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97de5/97de53dec34d4380f7eb90a97634bb75592675ea" alt=""
Early cognitive predictors AD
- Mild impairments episodic memory as early predictor AD
Mild impairments episodic memory as early predictor AD
- aMCI more likely to convert to AD than naMCI
- aMCI referred to as “MCI due to AD” (memory impairment + biomarkers)
How do memory impairments compare with preclinical biomarkers for AD? (Jedynak et al., 2012)
Hypothetical model of changes in biomarkers for AD (Jack et al., 2010)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e7de/6e7de7ec3d5e17b85215304f3ba4059b576f6dd7" alt=""
(Jedynak et al., 2012)
- Used (Jack et al., 2010) Model but added memory
- Delayed free recall Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT30): earliest predictor AD. Preceded hippocampal volume, amyloid beta and tau.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ff3e/2ff3e75cd9346e3b163b37970e95527da77a6366" alt=""
Early cognitive predictors AD
- Stable memory impairments may worsen shortly before symptoms AD:
- Lange et al. (2002)
Stable memory impairments may worsen shortly before symptoms AD
Lange et al. (2002):
- participants completed at least two annual evaluations.
- NC participants classified as nondemented at both evaluations.
- AD diagnosed with possible or probable AD at both evaluations.
- Preclinical AD diagnosed with possible/probable AD at last evaluation AND normal/MCI in preceding evaluation
Performance preclinical AD group on CVLT at 2, 1 and 0 years before diagnosis. Little difference APOE 4 positive or negative (Lange et al., 2002).
- it seems like decline is most steep in those shortly before being diagnosed.
- Little difference APOE 4 positive or negative (Lange et al., 2002).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8094/b8094078a0cbc6c35c4578d8900cbec86837a306" alt=""
Early cognitive predictors AD.
Episodic memory
EF
Semantic Knowledge
(Mickes et al , 2007)
- Converters: older adults who were cognitively normal 1 and 2 years prior to diagnosis probable AD (in year n)
- Sharp drop memory years before diagnosis.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/825db/825db6954e6f60ec8326a85eddc14d2a8382718c" alt=""
Early cognitive predictors AD
- Decline in episodic memory related to progress of neuropathology?
Rapid decline shortly before clinical stage:
- point where compensation increasing neuropathology no longer possible
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce931/ce931c0b95e867355430737d8b493954ddf16225" alt=""
Neuropsychological differences in preclinical AD (Han et al., 2017)
- Meta-analysis, 71 studies
- Cognitively healthy participants
- Biomarkers amyloid-positive (Presence of Alzheimer pathology) or amyloid negative
- PET or CSF
- Amyloid positive groups < amyloid negative groups on cognitive measures (they performed poorer) including:
- Global cognitive function
- Memory
- Language
- Visuospatial ability
- Speed of processing
- Executive functioning
- Amyloid positive groups > amyloid negative groups on measures premorbid functioning (WTAR: The Wechsler Test of Adult Reading, NART: National Adult Reading Test)
- so they were better than those without the pathology before the disease emerged
- Detectable cognitive differences occur early in course AD
- Not only memory or EF affected
Associated clinical features AD.
- Behavioural disturbances or neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS).
- Over course of disease, large majority (80%) persons with AD experience behavioural disturbances (Lyketsos et al., 2002)
- Behavioural disturbances greater burden family and caregivers than cognitive impairments
Associated clinical features of AD
- Prevalence behavioural disturbances (Lyketsos et al., 2002)
- N = 258 persons diagnosed with AD
- Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) completed by informant
- Review and meta-analysis (Zhao et al., 2016)
- 48 studies
- > 10.000 persons with AD
- 12 NPS of NPI
- Most common: apathy, agitation, depression, sleep disturbances and irritability
- 50% persons with MCI behavioural disturbances over the course of condition
- Graph: (Zhao et al., 2016)
- apathy, depression, aggression most common
- Prevalence apathy – affected by education level and severity cognitive impairments
- Prevalence depression - affected by age
- Prevalence aggression - affected by age and duration of disease
- Least common euphoria
- Wide variety in prevalence
- apathy, depression, aggression most common
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51679/51679d4204a47fd5f47cac3429f746e025f4d825" alt=""
Interventions in AD
- general
- No existing intervention can cure AD or stop its progression
- At best interventions can slow down rate of decline
Pharmacological interventions in AD
- For cognitive symptoms (symptomatic)
- For cognitive symptoms (symptomatic)
- Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors – to increase ACh levels
- Donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine
- Glutamate antagonist – to reduce activity glutamate neurotransmitter
- Memantine
- Positive effects on cognition and daily functioning
- Limited time (months to several years)
- Reviews effects acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and glutamate antagonist (DiSanto et al., 2013; Tan et al., 2014)
- Effects ACHEIs not influenced by AD severity
- Memantime more effective in more severe AD
- some patients can’t take any of these due to severe side-effects
- Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors – to increase ACh levels
Pharmacological interventions in AD.
- For behavioural symptoms
- Depression – antidepressives, mood stabilizing medication
- Anxiety – antidepressives, benzodiazepines (risk adverse effects)
- Agitated behaviour – antipsychotics (severe side-effects, not recommended for routine use)
Interventions
- Nonpharmacological interventions
- Cognitive training
- Review Bahar-Fuchs et al. (2013): no benefit over control condition
- CT stand alone – general cognition, small effect in people with dementia (Hill et al., 2017 review)
- Effective studies more stimulating variations: Wii, VR
- often cognitive ability only increases in the task that was trained and not generally
- Cognitive rehabilitation
- aim to improve daily functioning via compensation
- Positive effects on memory, sense of competence, QoL (Clare et al., 2010)
- Individualized intervention, compensatory aids and strategies.
- Cognitive stimulation
- aim is to engage in poritive experience (singing, playing etc.)
- Positive effect on cognition and wellbeing/QoL
- No effect daily functioning or behaviour (Woods et al., 2012, review)
- Computer-based interventions - CT, CR, CS, cognitive recreation (Garcia-Casal et al., 2017, review)
- Modest effects cognition, depression and anxiety
- No effect on daily functioning
Interventions for AD.
Nonpharmacological interventions:
- Interventions for caregivers
- Important management behavioural symptoms:
- improve caregivers’ knowledge of AD
- identify, modify factors cause/exacerbate behavioural symptoms
- Improve CG wellbeing
- PWD can live at home longer
- CG present intervention
- Cost-effectiveness
Interventions
¨Nonpharmacological interventions
- effects overall:
- Effects cognition or behaviour usually small
- Most effective in earlier stages AD
- Multi-component intervention more effective