Lecture 7 Flashcards

1
Q

Infants finding cues to word boundaries

A

stress patterns: in english most words start with a stressed syllable: if you assume that a stressed syllable indicates a word that should help you acquire words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

stress-initial example

A

KINGdom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

stress not initial

A

guiTAR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

stressed syllable

A

TAR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Not all languages have the…. stress pattern

A

english-type

  • with the word initial stress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How do you know what the properties of words are if you don’t know what the words are?

A

you can’t know that you have words with stress on the first syllable unless you know what some of the words are

statistical cues!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

there are not actually spaces between words

A

even though in a familiar language there seems like there is

though silent boundaries may be an important cue in learning word boundaries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

transition probabilities or conditional probabilities

A

just looking for patterns in a unfamiliar language: higher transition probability of one word transitioning into another word

what comes after “ba” alot of the time is “by” [baby]

implicitly keeping track of statistics used by infants to find out where word boundaries in their native language are

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

high transition probabilities

A

within words

most likely no word boundary

= 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

low transition probabilities

A

word boundaries exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how do we find out if transition probabilities happen?

A

let’s do some math…

highest probability you can get is 1 (no word boundary) and the lowest is 0 (never happens)

it’s statistics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

for “pa” if it’s just as likely to go to the syllables “li”, “go” and “nu” then the transition probability is

given “pa” what’s likely to come next?

A

1/3 or .33 transition probability for each syllable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Statistical Learning Experiement,

Saffrin, Aslin, and Newport, 1996

A

played made-up words to infants to assess how they were able to find word boundaries - all they had to go off of were the transition probabilities

1) played two different sounds: 3 syllable words with high within word transition probabilities and then with 3 syllable strings with lower transition probabilities (with word boundaries)
2) What do they listen to longer? - They listened to “PIRO.bi” (the low transition probability word) longer = indicates a novelty preference = infants reacting differently, suggesting they’re using statistical cues to tell the two types of words apart

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What about stress?

stress vs. statistics

results from experiment Johnson and Jusczyk, 2001

results from Thiessen and Saffran (2003)

A

2001: tress suggested different word boundaries than statistics: found that “stress” wins
2003: Stats win at 7 months, Stress wins at 9 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Segmentation precedes….

A

…stress!!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Statistical learning

what’s getting learned? Experiment with Aslin, Saffran, Newport, 1996

A

in real language some words happen much more frequently

  • made certain words occur 2x as often
  • made word boundary crossing syllables more frequently than actual word (doti.go more than bidaku)
  • they should listen longer to the “weird” thing (doti.go) than the one with the word boundary (bidaku) = YES they did

–> they are computing conditional probability rather than frequency

17
Q

there are some syllable pairs that are not actually words

A

(thedog): it’s a problem because if all you’re keeping track of are syllables occuring together you might learn false words

18
Q

conditional probably

A

given that syllable X has happened how likely is syllable Y to happen?

using the predictiveness of one syllable

works for language AS WELL AS for tone sequences, visual sequences = parsimonious and not language specific