Lecture 6B: Women Offenders Flashcards

1
Q

What trend have we been seeing with women offenders since 2017-18?

A
  • The numbers are low compared to men, however there is an interesting increase
  • Were seeing a trend of more women being incarcerated federally
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why should we focus on women offenders?

A

-Low prevalence (females account for 2-9% of prison population worldwide), masks any potential uniqueness; eclipsed by the male majority -Increasing numbers within prison system worldwide. Since 2000, 50% increase for women vs. 18% increase for men

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two requirements we have to study women offenders?

A
  • Ethical requirement: “Women shall not automatically be excluded from research solely on the basis of sex or reproductive capacity” (Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans)
  • Legal Requirement: The Corrections and Conditional Release Act says “The Service shall…provide programs designed particularly to address the needs of female offenders”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the Gender similarity hypothesis vs. Gender differences Hypothesis?

A
  • Gender Similarities hypothesis: posits that men and women are similar on most, but not all psychological variables
  • Gender Differences Hypothesis: States that men and women are vastly different psychologically speaking
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the method of Hyde (2005) study on gender differences?

A
  • Reviewed 46 different meta-analyses
    -128 individual effect sizes
    Domains examined:
    -Cognitive abilities
    -Social/personality variables
    -Psychological well-being
    -Motor behaviour
    -Other
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Hyde (2005) find in terms of Where are the gender differences and when do they emerge?

A
  • Personality: Women more agreeable; men more assertive
  • Sexuality: Men have more casual attitudes about sex
  • Physical aggression: Men are more physically aggressive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the main conclusions of Hyde (2005)?

A
  • Gender differences have been vastly over-stated
  • The evidence strongly favours the gender similarities hypothesis
  • However, gender differences to exist (e.g., aggression, different contexts)
  • Results replicated recently (Zell et al., 2015, 386 meta-analyses!)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a typical women offender?

A
  • Has committed fraud, theft, common assault, and administration of justice offences
  • Violence is usually emotions-driven (anger, jealousy, revenge) occurring in the context of relationships
  • Violence is less likely to be instrumentally motivated (e.g. pure greed)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the gender gap in crime?

A

-The gender gap in crime – males account for the vast majority of crime, particular violent crime
-Gender gap is widest for violent crimes: Homicide, robbery, rape, weapons-offences (9/10 are male offenders); 85% of serial killers are male
-Gender gap is most narrow for non-violent crimes:
Shoplifting, writing bad checks (1 in 2 are female); welfare fraud (3 in 4 are female)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the Big differences between male and female offenders?

A
  • Lower risk & less serious offences
  • More mental health problems
  • More extensive histories of childhood abuse
  • Relationship and attachment deficits are more prevalent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the only domain that men scored higher than women on in the dynamic factors identification and analysis revised (DFIA-R)?

A
  • attitude is the only domain where men are higher than women
  • look to see which offenders have elevated needs which will then inform correctional programming
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the comparison between men and women mental health disorders?

A
Men
~ 70% met criteria for at least one mental disorder
17% mood disorder
3.3% psychotic
50% substance use
30% anxiety
16% borderline personality
44% antisocial personality
Women
~ 80% met criteria for at least one mental disorder
22% mood disorder
5% psychotic 
76% substance use
54% anxiety
33% borderline personality
49% antisocial personality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does the report on self harm in women’s prisons illustrate?

A
  • Self harm is poorly understood (don’t know how to treat this problem)
  • Incidents of self harm has tripled
  • There have been improvements in how CSC manages offenders with mental health concerns
  • Upon admission to custody, offenders are screened by CSC’s computerized mental health screening system
  • In FY16/17, CSC invested $80 million to support the treatment and management of federal offenders with mental health needs
  • As of August 1, 2017, offenders with a serious mental illness with significant impairment cannot be admitted to administrative segregation.
  • Continued efforts are necessary!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the one universal truth or fact about crime?

A

There is one universal truth about crime – boys/men commit more crime, particularly more violent and serious crime than girls/women regardless of the research methodology or disciplinary orientation of the researcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the theories of female offending? why do they commit crime?

A
  • Gender neutral: general criminological theories that explicitly or implicitly assume that what works for men works equally well for women.
  • Female centered: posit that we need entirely different explanations of female offending.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Gender neutral theories: the PIC-R

A
  • PIC-R = Personal, Interpersonal, Community Reinforcement (Andrews & Bonta, 2003)
    1. crime is learned
    2. rewards > costs = crime
    3. strongest risk factors: attitudes, associates, criminal history, antisocial orientation
    4. weak risk factors: self-esteem, SES
  • Applies to all individuals regardless of gender or ethnic origin
  • Risk, Need, and Responsivity (RNR) principles
17
Q

Is the RNR perspective applicable to women?

A

-In general, evidence to date supports the application of the theory to women.
Dowden and Andrews (1999) found that treatment interventions following the
-RNR perspective were associated with enhanced reductions in reoffending.

18
Q

How did feminist centered theories arise?

A

Arose from feminist critiques of the criminological literature

  • Sexist (biological explanations more important for women; environment more important for men)
  • Do not adequately explain the gender gap in offending patterns
  • Women are invisible

-Female-centered holistic theories (grounded in ideology/feminist thought, qualitative and descriptive research and the ‘gender difference hypothesis’)

19
Q

What do female centered theories posit?

A
  • Gender is afforded central causal significance
  • All female-centered theories posit that the onset, maintenance and eventual desistance of female criminal conduct is different from that of male criminal conduct
20
Q

What is the feminist pathways theory?

A

Developed a conceptional framework of the five pathways women often take into crime:

  • Street women
  • Battered women
  • Harmed and harming women
  • Drug-connected women
  • Economically motivated women
21
Q

What are the criticisms of the feminist pathways theory?

A
  • Small sample sizes and the reliance on qualitative research methods
  • Do not disaggregate data by age (girls vs women)
  • Do not compare with men
  • More research is needed!
22
Q

Prevalence vs. relevance of elevated need

A
  • We’ve seen that women have very elevated needs
  • But does that mean that a highly prevalent need should be addressed through intervention? Is it related to offending patterns?
  • We need to confirm that these needs are relevant to criminal behaviour
23
Q

Do gender neutral assessment tools work well with women offenders?

A
  • Research on the DFIA-R (Stewart et al. 2017) has found that ratings are associated with returns to custody – being rated as higher need is associated with greater rates of return.
  • BUT, this research also found that certain items seem to be more important for women compared to men: Financial instability, Education concerns, Problematic intimate relationships
24
Q

Why are gender neutral tolls criticized even though they do seem to work

A
  • They do not recognize unique female pathways to crime
  • They may over-estimate risk – a high risk woman is not the same as a high risk man
  • Very few tools are built from the ground up for women and girls
  • Service Planning Inventory for Women (SPIN-W; Orbis Partners, 2007)
  • Women’s Risk/Need Assessment (WRNA; VanVoorhis, 2013)
25
Q

What is a Gender neutral risk factor vs. Gender salient vs. Gender specific?

A

Gender-neutral risk factor: A risk factor that predicts criminal behaviour equally well for men and women.

Gender-salient risk factor: A risk factor that predicts criminal behaviour for both men and women, however, the prediction is stronger for one gender.

Gender-specific: A risk factor that predicts only for one gender and not the other.

26
Q

Utility of the WRNA in pretrial defendants: what does the study mean?

A
  • Many risk/need factors included in the WRNA, such as mental health, homelessness, and family support appear to be associated with unsatisfactory outcomes for both men AND women – suggesting these may not be unique to women offenders.
  • Associations with community outcomes appear to be stronger for women as compared to men – suggesting gender-saliency over gender-specificity.
27
Q

Gender-neutral assessment tools appear to work relatively well with women. But still…

A

There are nuanced differences that male tools inherently don’t capture as well
- the context – why is she high risk? The trauma-induced pathway to the criminal justice system
- Importance of family dynamics
- Impact of transient living – group homes, streets
Importance of older, male peers/romantic partners
- Not enough emphasis placed of mental health factors

28
Q

How does security classification within the CSC work for women offenders?

A
  • When offenders are admitted to CSC custody, both men and women are assessed using the Custody Rating Scale (CRS) to determine security placement: minimum, medium, maximum
  • HOWEVER, reclassification of security levels is determined with the use of a gender-informed assessment tool: the Security Reclassification Scale for Women (SRSW)
  • the items on the SRSW don’t look like they are unique to women but they were built from a sample of women (ie., gender informed)
29
Q

What is the history of women’s federal incarceration?

A
  • Prison for Women, Kingston ON: 1934-2000
  • Creating Choices, 1990 (is the go to referral for any womens corrections: creating choices, has recommendations and guidelines to treat women federal offenders in a more humane environment)
  • Commission of Inquiry into Certain Events at the Prison for Women in Kingston, 1996
30
Q

What is the situation today for women incarceration?

A

Situation today
5 regional facilities: Nova Scotia, Quebec, Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia
1 Indigenous Healing Lodge: Saskatchewan

31
Q

What are the five guiding principles of creating choices (gender specific offender management model)

A
Empowerment
Meaningful and Responsible Choices
Respect and Dignity
Supportive Environment
Shared Responsibility
32
Q

What did recent meta analytic work find about correctional programming for women?

A
  • More recent meta-analytic research examining interventions found positive outcomes for women participating in correctional programs
  • What was particularly interesting was among higher quality studies, gender-informed or gender-responsive treatment approaches were more effective than gender-neutral programs.
33
Q

What is women offender correctional programming?

A
  • Adheres to the principles of RNR, BUT driven by the five core principles identified by the Creating Choices report (1990): Empowerment
    Meaningful and responsible, choices, Respect and dignity
    Supportive environment,
    Shared responsibility
    -The focus is a holistic, women-centered model of programming
34
Q

Depending on a womans level of static risk/dynamic need, what are the different programming paths?

A
  • Women’s Engagement Program
  • Women’s Moderate Intensity Program
  • Women’s High Intensity Program
  • Women’s Self Management Program (available both in the institution and the community)
  • There are also Indigenous-specific versions of these programs (AWOCP)
35
Q

What are the key elements of the gender responsive models?

A

-Holistic approach (criminogenic and non-criminogenic factors addressed simultaneously):
Target addictions, be skills-based, enhance self-efficacy whilst dealing with internalizing mental health issues
- Greater emphasis placed on ‘responsivity’ issues: Trauma-informed, relational, female-only, strengths
parental stress, empowerment focus, safety issues
-Multiple Outcomes: recidivism reduction, healthy relationships restored

36
Q

Has research found support for the WOCP/AWOCP?

A
  • Recent research has found support for this program portfolio (Derkzen, Harris, Wardrop, & Thompson, 2017)
  • Post-program measurement found improvements in motivation for change, social problem-solving, self-efficacy, and other correctional objectives.
  • Women who completed all the programs they were enrolled in were less likely to return custody when released compared to those who did not.
37
Q

What works (in terms of correctional treatment programs)?

A

Recent meta-analysis (Gobeil, Blanchette & Stewart, 2016): 37 treatment outcome studies, 22,000 women offenders

  • Results: Odds of recidivating were 22 to 35% less likely for women who participated in correctional treatment vs. those who did not
  • Findings were the same for programs classified as GR or gender neutral (i.e., cognitive behavioral), BUT there was a moderator
  • the moderator was methodological rigour
  • Analysis of methodologically rigourous studies only illustrated that GR programs outperformed GN programs
38
Q

What is the take home message?

A

The evidence supports an integrated approach rather than an ‘either’, ‘or’ strategy

39
Q

What is the remaining debate?

A

-Most gender responsive scholars support the risk and specific responsivity principles (mixed support for cognitive behaviourism)
-The big debate: what need factors should be targeted?
Gender responsive scholars-relational dysfunction, addictions, abuse/trauma, mental health, empowerment
Gender neutral scholars—criminal attitudes and criminal associates