Lecture 4: Violent Offenders Flashcards

1
Q

What is the purpose of corrections?

A
  • Carry out sentence
  • Provide the degree of custody or control necessary to contain offender’s risk - classification
  • Encourage offenders to participate in experiences to assist them to become law-abiding citizens
  • Encourage offenders to prepare for eventual and successful release
  • Provide a safe and healthful environment, consistent with community standards
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the principles for corrections?

A

1) Individuals under sentence retain all the rights and privileges of a member of society, except those are restricted by fact of incarceration (Restricting rights requires justification). Punishment consists only of loss of liberty, restriction of mobility. No other punishment should be imposed by correctional authorities
2) Any punishment or loss of liberty that results from an offender’s violation of institutional rules must be imposed in accordance with law
3) Ready access to fair grievance and remedial measure
4) Least restrictive course, consistent with public protection and institutional safety and order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the bottom line about risk assessment?

A

The use of purpose-specific scales is encouraged, as they improve ecological validity and are more defensible in the event of false negatives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the prevalence of violent offenders?

A
  • 26% of charges in adult court are violent (about 14% if common assault & weapons excluded)
  • Rate of homicide has dropped since 1979 (< 2 per 100,000)
  • Rate of violence crime has dropped since 1992 (~1000 per 100,000)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are crimes against the person?

A
  • Homicide and related
  • Attempted murder
  • Robbery
  • Sexual assault
  • Other sexual offences
  • Major assaults (levels 2 & 3)
  • Common assaults (level 1)
  • Utter threats
  • Criminal harassment
  • Weapons
  • Other crimes against persons
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the definition of violence?

A
  • Actual, attempted, or threatened physical harm that is deliberate and nonconsenting
  • includes violence against victims who cannot give full, informed consent
  • includes fear-inducing behavior, where threats may be implicit or directed at third parties
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What 2 general explanations have informed assessment and programming for violent offenders?

A
  • Anger/arousal (from 1975 - 2000)

- Information processing/schema (from 1990 – current)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What do the 2 general explanations mean?

A
  • Cognitive schema influence what we attend to and how we interpret external events
  • Arousal and impulsivity are related to violence expression
  • Violence is a complex interplay among thoughts, emotions, and behaviour (Note: all are targeted in CSC violence programs)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Violence as a choice

A
  • The proximal cause of violence is a decision to act violently
  • The decision is influenced by a host of biological, psychological, and social factors: neurological insult, hormonal abnormality, psychosis, personality disorder, exposure to violent models, attitudes that condone violence
  • Multiple pathways to violence (multiply-determined)
  • the general aggression model
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the previous strategies to define violent offenders?

A
Criminal conviction (assaults)
Attitudes (hostility)
Emotions (anger)
Poor self-regulation (impulsivity)
Victim selection (spousal assault)
Diagnosis (APD)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Is there heterogeneity among violent offenders?

A
-Yes:
Motivation for violence (dystonic/syntonic)
Precursors
Mental disorders
Skills and competence
Anger (arousal/reactivity)
Problem solving
Role of substance abuse
Aggression/hostility (schema)
Power/control issues
Victim affiliation/selection
Impulsivity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the types of violent offenders?

A
  • Typologies are often used to understand differences among offenders.
  • Typologies (theoretical and empirical) identify similarities among offenders in order to assist in determining assessment, programming and supervision strategies.
  • Two common examples consider diagnosis (psychopathy) and motivation (instrumental versus affective violence).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How can we code for instrumental violence?

A
  1. planning or preparation before the aggression,
  2. goal directed – the act helped obtain a specific and identifiable goal (e.g., money),
  3. the aggressive behavior was unprovoked by the victim,
  4. lack of anger during the aggression, and
  5. the victim of the aggression was a stranger.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How can we define instrumental or proactive violence?

A
  • violence is not emotionally driven
  • violence is precipitated by revenge, power and control, and financial or material gain
  • considered gratuitous if violence is excessive and beyond that required to meet goal
  • cognitive distortions regarding sense of entitlement and motivations of others are key
  • arousal is coincidental and therefore not a legitimate treatment target
  • proximal triggers are difficult to identify
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is affective or reactive violence?

A

-Violence is emotionally driven
-violence has high arousal component and is a legitimate treatment target
-victim injury is often more excessive because of poor internal controls (distinct from sadists)
-cognitive distortions regarding expectations
-Proximal triggers are more readily identifiable (physiological symptoms, faulty thinking)
often offender describes a tenuous ability to “control self”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What actuarial tool is typically used for violence risk assessment?

A

The VRAG or the VRAG-R. The VRAG-R has slightly better predictive validity. The AUC for the vrag/vrag-r is very good (mid 7’s), it is about as high as it gets.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What does the data suggest about the self-report approach?

A

The SAQ (self appraisal questionnaire) scores were correlated very highly with other risk scales like the SIR-R1, the LSI-R1, PCL-R, and the VRAG. These data suggest that you can use self-report data. The content in the SAQ looks like the central eight, thus it makes sense that there is high predictive validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is an example of a structured professional judgement scale?

A
  • The violence risk scale (The VRS uses 6 Static and 20 Dynamic variables)
  • this is one of the best SPJ tools
  • each of the items is presented and allocates each item as present, not present or semi present.
  • falls into a model called the stages of change
  • study: people who score low on the VRS have failure rates of about 8% for violent and 22% for nonviolent return and those who scored high had >50% for non violent and violent. Demonstrates that people’s VRS scores change as a function of that program and it results in better outcomes.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Personality and Crime: The Role of Psychopathy

A

What is psychopathy? A personality disorder

  • inflexible, maladaptive manner of perceiving, relating to, and thinking about oneself and the world
  • Specific pattern of interpersonal, affective, and behavioural symptoms (Cleckley)
  • AKA sociopathy , antisocial personality disorder
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the 3 types of assessment methods for psychopathy?

A
  • Diagnostic/expert ratings (DSM-IV, PCL-R, PCL:SV)
  • Self-reports (MMPI-2, MCMI-III, PAI, PPI)
  • Projectives (RIB, TAT, HTP)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are the adult DSM-IV criteria for APD?

A
-Adult criteria (3 of 7)
repeated criminal acts
deceitfulness
impulsivity
irritability
recklessness
irresponsibility
lack of remorse
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What age do you have to be in order to be diagnosed with APD?

A
  • Current age at least 18
  • Conduct disorder before age 15 (3 of 15)
    • Aggression (i.e., used weapon, robbed)
    • Violated rules (i.e., ran away, truant)
    • antisocial acts (i.e., set fires, B&E)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What percentage of all offenders have been diagnosed with APD and Psychopathy?

A

65% of all offenders have APD and about 20% of that have psychopathy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

can you use the PCL-R to diagnose APD?

A
  • Forensic/correctional populations
  • 90% of psychopaths are APD
  • 20% of APD are psychopathic
  • Most APD do not have the Factor 1 characteristics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is the description of the Hare scales?

A
  • Symptom construct rating scales: require clinical/expert judgment, based on “all data”
  • Data obtained from two primary sources: review of case history (required), interview/observation (recommended)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What are the factor 1 items of the PCL-R

A
Glibness/superficial charm
Grandiose sense of self-worth
Pathological lying
Conning/manipulative
Lack of remorse or guilt
Shallow affect
Callous/lack of empathy
Failure to accept responsibility for own actions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What are the factor 2 items of the PCL-R?

A
Need for stimulation/-proneness to boredom
Parasitic lifestyle
Poor behavioral controls	
Early behavioral problems
Lack of realistic, long-term goals
Impulsivity
Irresponsibility
Juvenile delinquency
Revocation of conditional release
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What are the additional items on the PCL-R?

A

Promiscuous sexual behavior
Many short-term marital relationships
Criminal versatility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Describe the Hare psychology checklist revised?

A
20 items scored using
semi-structured interview
multiple source file information
 police/corrections, mental health, family, employment
3-point scale, total ranges from 0 to 40
30
Q

What is the mean score of the general population vs. criminals vs. psychopaths on the PCL-R?

A

General population M= 5/40
Criminals M=22/40
Psychopaths = 30/40

31
Q

What are the advantages of hare scales?

A

Good coverage of symptoms
Provide dimensional and categorical scores
Don’t require co-operation
Normed and validated in a variety of forensic and non-forensic contexts
Good predictive validity vis-à-vis general, violent, and sexually violent crime

32
Q

What is the 2 facet model?

A

Factor 1: interpersonal/affective features (Narcissistic and dominant, low empathy/anxiety)
Factor 2: socially deviant lifestyle (impulsive and irresponsible, Delinquent and antisocial)

33
Q

What is the 4 facet model?

A

interpersonal, affective, lifestyle, antisocial

34
Q

What are the 2 spin off’s of PCL-R?

A

PCL-SV: Validated for adult offenders, forensic patients, civil patients, and community residents (male and female)
PCL-YV: Modification of PCL-R for use in male and female Young Offenders (delinquents)
Some item definitions expanded or changed to clarify scoring in youths

35
Q

What is the administration time of the PCL-R?

A

Stand-alone: 90 to 120+ minutes for the PCL-R
45 to 90+ minutes for the PCL:SV
Add-on: 10 to 15 minutes for the PCL-R, 5 to 10 minutes for the PCL:SV

36
Q

What qualifications does a user need to administer the PCL-R?

A

Independent use:
- licensed / registered professional
- doctoral degree with psychometric training
- forensic experience
- specific training
Supervised use:
- supervisor assumes full professional and ethical responsibility

37
Q

What is the recommended training before using the PCL-R?

A
  • Review of the research literature (workshop, reprints)
  • Practice scoring items (videotape clips, practice files)
  • Practice scoring cases (5 to 10 “throw-away” cases, review cases with colleagues)
  • Quality assurance
38
Q

What is the purpose of interviews in the PCL-R process?

A
Purposes:
- assess interpersonal/affective style
- assess credibility
- obtain historical information
Good interview:
- semi-structured
- relatively long
- includes challenges
39
Q

What is the purpose of a case history review in the PCL-R process?

A
Purposes:
-obtain historical information
-assess credibility
-assess interpersonal / affective style
Good review includes multiple sources:
-mental health
-police / corrections
-family / community
-military / employment
40
Q

What is the relationship between psychopathy and crime?

A

Propensity to violate rules, impulsive

  • Start crime younger
  • Commit more frequent crimes
  • Are more versatile
41
Q

Relative to nonpsychopaths, these offenders:

A

Have a greater number of violent convictions.
More likely to use weapons & re-offend violently.
More likely to have institutional infractions.
More likely to assault strangers.
Less severe victim injury.
More likely to report attributional biases.

42
Q

Describe the study on psychopathy and general reoffending (hart, Kropp and hare, 1998)

A
First prediction study
Assessed 231 male adult offenders
Release decision blind to psychopathy score
Parole
Mandatory supervision
Follow-up period = 3.5 years 
Outcome: revocation or new offense
43
Q

What are the implications of research on psychopathy?

A
  • Offenders vary in terms of time to failure according to their PCL-R score
  • Psychopathy AND sexual deviance are important predictors
  • Could assist in conditional probability estimates?
44
Q

What do meta-analyses about the PCL-R and psychopathy show?

A
  • 9 metas ( 33,000 cases)
  • PCL-R consistently predicts violent recidivism
  • Appears to be the “best” predictor of violence
45
Q

What are the ethical problems associated with scales like the PCL-R?

A
  • Unqualified users (e.g., no manual, no professional degree)
  • Lack of specific expertise (e.g., no training or forensic experience)
  • Deviation from recommended procedure (e.g., no interview)
  • Violation of test security (e.g., sending materials to unqualified people)
46
Q

What is the coffee can experiment?

A
  • Comparison of risk measures
  • LSI-R, PCL-R, VRAG, SIR
  • Random selection of 101 risk items from the four scales
  • None exceeded the predictive accuracy of the random scales
47
Q

The Efficacy of Violence Prediction: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Nine Risk Assessment Tools

A
  • Scales have moderate predictive validity.
  • If the intention is only to predict future violence, then the 9 tools are essentially interchangeable.
  • The selection of which tool to use in practice should depend on what other functions the tool can perform rather than on its efficacy in predicting violence
48
Q

What two things are both important in risk assessment and which one identifies clearer program targets?

A
  • Personality and risk/needs are BOTH important in risk assessment
  • Risk/needs is more dynamic and identifies clearer program targets
  • The field continues to evolve (measure versus construct!)
49
Q

What are exampls of general risk scales?

A

LSI-R – Level of Service Inventory – Revised
Ohio Risk Assessment Scale
SIR-R1 – Statistical Information on Recidivism – Revised Version 1

50
Q

What are examples of violent risk scales

A

PCL-R – Psychopathy Checklist - Revised
VRAG-R – Violence Risk Assessment Guide-Revised
VRS – Violence Risk Scale
HCR20 – Historical-Clinical-Risk-Management 20
SIR-R1 (acceptable but not preferred if the others are available)

51
Q

what are some examples of intimate partner risk scales?

A

SARA – Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (B-SAFER)
ODARA – Ontario Domestic Violence Risk Assessment
DVRAG – Domestic Violence Risk Assessment Guide

52
Q

What is the definition of domestic violence?

A
  • Domestic Violence: any violence occurring between family members
  • Spousal violence (intimate partner violence)
  • Abuse can include: Physical, Sexual, Emotional
53
Q

what are the typologies of male batterers?

A

Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994)
Family-only batterer
Dysphoric/borderline batterer
Generally violent/antisocial batterer

54
Q

What are the risk factors in spousal assaulters?

A

Prior criminal history
Breach no contact orders (unique)
Antisocial personality disorder

55
Q

which scale best predicts spousal assault?

A

ODARA (.64)

56
Q

Which scale had the best predictive accuracy for IPV recidivism?

A

The SARA

57
Q

What is the summary of IPV research?

A
  • Messing & Thaller (2013)- This review examined the predictive validity weighted by sample size of five IPV risk measures (including the ODARA, SARA, and DA), and found that the ODARA was significantly better at predicting IPV recidivism than all measures, with an average weighted AUC of .666.
  • Jung & Buro (2016)- In this prospective study, both the ODARA and SARA predicted any, general violence, and IPV recidivism, and neither was significantly better at predicting recidivism than the other.
  • Helmus & Bourgon (2011)- This review showed that independent empirical examinations of the SARA have demonstrated its ability to predict IPV.
  • Lauria et al. (2017)- In this prospective study conducted in a real-life setting, the authors found that the ODARA performed equally as well as previous, retrospective file review studies, with an AUC of .68.
58
Q

What are some additional considerations about the ODARA?

A
  • The ODARA predicts repeat physical assault (including threats or sexual violence) of female intimate partners by male perpetrators.
  • Alternative DVs are of interest (threats, etc.).
  • ODARA items pertaining to the perpetrators’ history of acting violently toward others accounted for the majority of the ODARA’s prediction of further assault.
  • Perpetrators with a history of general violent behavior were more likely to reoffend toward their intimate partner (hence, back to Holzworth-Munroe typology).
  • ODARA Victim concern contributed most to the predictive power of the instrument for future police contact for IPV.
59
Q

So which one is better the SARA or the ODARA?

A
  • SARA total score has most empirical research.
  • ODARA seems slightly higher predictive accuracy (but may be sample dependent).
  • ODARA seems most popular and training is very accessible.
60
Q

Which gender is more likely to have murdered an intimae partner?

A

Female homicide offenders are more likely to have murdered an intimate partner than male homicide offenders (60% versus 20%)

61
Q

Who are male homicide offenders more likely to have killed?

A

Male homicide offenders more likely to have killed a stranger than female homicide offenders (1/4 versus 1/14)

62
Q

How do domestic homicide motives differ for males and females?

A
  • Primary motive for men: jealousy, infidelity, desertion, control
  • Primary motive for women: response to domestic violence
63
Q

Which gender is more likely to kill children?

A
  • Men and women are equally likely to murder their children; however motivations vary by gender
  • Male motivation: retaliation, jealousy/rejection; discipline-related
  • Female motivation: unplanned; mercy killing; psychotic
64
Q

What is violent offender programming (tertiary care)?

A
  • Program models: Anger focus, Multifactorial (Information processing)
  • Vary in terms of: Dosage (200 hours), Skills and training of facilitators
65
Q

What are the typical treatment targets?

A

Motivation
Past negative lifestyles that lead to violence
Antisocial attitudes, beliefs, and values that support violence
Anger control
Problem-solving
Interpersonal skills
Self-regulation & self- management

66
Q

What is the relationship between anger and recidivism?

A
  • No difference between violent & nonviolent offenders on anger (Loza & Loza (1999); Mills & Kroner, 2003)
  • Anger scores unrelated to recidivism (Mills & Kroner, 2003)
  • Conclusion: Anger is a questionable treatment target for reductions of violent offending
67
Q

What are the findings and conclusions about anger programs?

A
  • Evidence that anger control programs are related to reductions in recidivism is mixed
    • Serin & Brown ( 1996, 1997) √
    • Dowden, Blanchette & Serin (1999) √
    • Howells, et al (2004) Χ
  • Conclusion: Anger is an insufficient explanation of violent offending (and re-offending) (Polaschek & Collie, 2004)
68
Q

What are the results of the VPP (violence prevention program)?

A
  • Non-treated offenders had 1.36 times greater rates of failures, 1.36 times greater rates of any recidivism, and 2.10 times greater rates of violent recidivism than offenders who had completed the VPP.
  • In addition, offenders who had started but failed to finish the VPP had 1.69 greater rates of failures, 2.22 times greater rates of any recidivism, and 4.25 times greater rates of violent recidivism than offenders who had completed the program.
69
Q

Indigenous offenders and the VPP?

A
  • In terms of violent recidivism, compared to the Aboriginal offenders who completed the VPP, untreated Aboriginal offenders had 3.33 times greater rates of new violent offences.
  • Similarly, Aboriginal offenders who had started but failed to complete the VPP had 3.92 times greater rates of violent recidivism compared to treated Aboriginal offenders.
70
Q

What is the VERA-2R?

A

VERA-2R contains 34 indicators specifically related to violent extremism.
Five domains: Beliefs, attitudes and ideology;
Social context and intention;
History, action and capacity;
Commitment and motivation;
Protective / risk-mitigating indicators.

71
Q

What is the program effectiveness for violent vs. general reoffending?

A

General: Most reductions are 10-20% (NZ, Washington State)
Violence: Results are mixed for anger control programs/ Non-completers (33%) have 4-8 times the failure rate