Lecture 6 Visual Search Flashcards

1
Q

visual search

A

finding a target in space (feature integration theory); finding a target in a time series (rapid serial visual search; “repetition blindness”; “attentional blink”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

feature search

A

type of search; looking for an odd man out (look for a uniquely colored object); easy; fast (300 ms); parallel (0-10 ms/item); “preattentive”

does not require attention –> efficient (evidence for feature integration theory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

conjunction search

A

type of search; looking for a combination of features (e.g., T among Ls; red vertical among green vertical and red horizontal); hard; slower; sequential; attentive

requires attention –> inefficient (evidence for feature integration theory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

feature integration theory

A

Anne Treisman; a visual display is coded by two types of maps: feature maps and master map of locations; feature maps and location map are insufficient – need some way of locating features and binding appropriate features together –> attention does this by moving within the location map and selects whatever features are linked to that location (or object)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

feature maps

A

contain info about the presence of a feature anywhere in the field; activity tells us what is out there; have no info about where it is located and what other features the object has

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

master map of location

A

contains info about where features are; has no info about which features are located where

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

search asymmetry

A

evidence for feature integration theory

hypothesis: simple features are detected because they produce unique activation on a feature map
prediction: the absence of a feature should be harder to detect than the presence of a feature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

illusory conjunction

A

evidence for feature integration theory

hypothesis: simple features are bound to a location by the operation of focused attention
prediction: without attention, features may be incorrectly bound to locations

example:

  • primary task: recognize digits at left and right
  • secondary task: report letters in the middle
  • presented with: [8 greenT orangeL purpleD 3] –> was there an orange D, purple d, or green D?
  • subjects sometimes think they saw an orange or green D
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

balint syndrome

A

part of illusory conjunction; patients have brain damage to both sides of parietal lobe; see only one object at a time; also known as “simultagnosia”

patient RM: no difficulty with feature search, poor at conjunction search

  • shown two colored letters (red T, yellow X)
  • rarely commit color or letter intrusions (green T, red O)
  • high percentage of illusory conjunction (yellow T, red X)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

neurophysiological evidence for FIT

A

different brain regions code different features separately; attention binds features together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP)

A

searching for a pre-specified target is easy –> visual perception is fast; recognizing a target AFTER the series has been presented is difficult –> visual memory is limited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What where the Visual Search lab results?

A

a

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

repetition blindness

A

RSVP phenomena; failure to detect repetitions of visual stimuli in lists presented in RSVP; occurs even when words differ in case or locations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

attentional blink

A

RSVP phenomena; when one target is detected, people often fail to detect a second (different) target within the next 200-500ms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly