Lecture 6 - History of psychology and neuroscience Flashcards
What does the Edwin Smith Papyrus show? What is it evidence for?
It’s a papyrus from Ancient Egypt that contains short descriptions of the symptoms and treatment of different forms of the brain injury (person ‘shuffled’ while walking which was suprising to the doctor since ‘the wound was in the skull’)
- It illustrates how physicians treating wounded soldiers quite early became convinced of the importance of the head (brain) in controlling behaviour
Which organ did Ancient Greek philosophers identify as the thinking organ?
- Hippocrates: placed the soul in the brain
- Plato: brain (important for reasoning), but recognised the heart to have a function (sensations), brain came directly from the divine and immortal soul of the universe but the soul in the heart was mortal so a neck separated the two to avoid pollution of divine soul from the moral one
- Aristotle: heart
What were Aristotle’s reasons for assuming that the heart is the thinking organ?
- The heart is perceptibly affected by emotion - you can feel your heart pounding when you’re emtional but not your brain
- It is located at a central point, according to the role of thinking
- All living creatures with blood have a heart, but not all have an observable brain (invertebrates)
What was, according to Aristotle, the function of the brain and what did he base this on?
The brain seems unaffected by emotion (bloodless) so it functions to cool down the heart
- He thoughts that brain wasn’t connected with the sense organs since there were no vessels whereas heart was connected with all sense organs and muscles, via blood vessels
- He compared humans’ behaviour to other organisms (animals) but it wasn’t empirical research since he didn’t conduct any experiments; therefore physicians didn’t follow him on this topic
Who was responsible for the decisive moment that the brain is important for sensation and movement control and why?
Galen
- He was a medic so he saw what happened to people after head injuries from a fight in a Roman arena
- He also experimented with animals and discovered the nerve pathways (white, hollow tubes going from the brain)
- Cutting the nerves in a pig’s throat prevents the pig from making any noise
- So the ‘voice’ comes from the brain, not the heart
How did Galen think the soul and the brain interact with the body?
- The animal spirit floated from the ventricles through nerves (hollow tubes) to the body
- (ventricles: apertures in the middle of the brain, thought to contain perceptions, memories and thoughts - seat of the animal spirits)
- The brain was a hub, heart is dissmised as a thinking organ
- He remained influential until the 16th century since there was almost no further experimentation on the brain
In the 16th century, cities were becoming richer and universities were taking ground, hence more time and effort for experimentation. Who took advantage of this and what did he establish?
Vesalius who dissected humans and drew maps of the parts of the body, including the brain
- Established that there are 3 ventricles in the brain (picture 1) with each having its own function:
↪ 1st: common sense (connected to all the sense, shows in the picture by the lines going from the nose, eyes, mouth), fantasy
↪ 2nd ventricle: thoughts
↪ 3rd ventricle: memory
What did Decartes propose about the body and behaviour?
- Descartes introduced mechanical ideas about body and behavior - use mathematical language to predict behaviour
- Clock as metaphor - bird migration patterns as an example of clock driven mechanical behavior
- In humans, he showcast it by proposing the mechanical theory of reflex
What was the mechanical theory of reflex proposed by Decartes?
- a sensory sensation travels through the nerves
- it’s ‘bounced back’ through the same nerves as a mirror in the brain
- That leads to (involuntary) behavior
- e.g. withdrawing your foot when it’s too close to the fire (picture 2)
- In 1784, CZECH physiologist Jiří Procháska argued that reflexes included the spinal cord rather than the brain in itself (what a smart dude)
What did Decartes say about the body and the soul?
He humans differ from animals in that humans have a soul which is spiritual in nature
- Neoplatonian substance dualism:
- Res extensa - divisible substance (body)
- Res cogitans - indivisible substance (thinking substance - soul)
- He did his own neuroanatomical research (in Amsterdam!) in a slaughter house
- He identified the pineal gland in humans which is the place where the body and soul meet
↪ in the middle of the brain so it’s connected with every part of the body
In the 17th/18th century, increasing focus on the brain itself. How did Thomas Willis contributed to that?
He moved from ventricles to gray matter of the brain
Willis developed neural functional organization, but not just the pineal gland:
- Higher brain structures for more advanced organisms, more complex functions (memory, volition)
- Lower structures for more elementary functions (heartbeat, respiration)
Related this to clinical descriptions of neurological & psychiatric disorders (examined his patients symptoms and linked them to their disorder)
At the end of 18th century, what happened to the idea of the soul now that the brain is identified as the thinking organ?
The unconscious mind/soul remained an unconquerable idea - the soul was to holy for the scientists to say anything about it
What were the 5 breakthroughs in the 19th century that altered the model of brain functioning?
- The discovery of the cerebrospinal axis
- The growing impact of the reflex
- The localisation of brain functions
- The discovery of the nerve cell
- The disentangling of the communication between neurons.
1.The discovery of the cerebrospinal axis
What did scientists observe when they cut at the top of the spinal cord? What did this discovery confirm from an evolutionary perspective?
The body remains functioning in a vegetative state when the cerebral hemispheres are disconnected - some bodily functions don’t require the brain
- supported by the discovery that some animals had a spinal cord but no brain but never the reverse → spinal cord takes evolutionary precedence over the brain
2.The growing impact of the reflex
What was the reflex arc and who proposed it?
Marshall Hall proposed the reflex arc which is a mechanism involved in involuntary movements elicited by sensory stimuli
- A signal is picked up by sensory receptors, transmitted to the spinal cord through an afferent nerve, transferred to interneurons, which activate motor neurons that send a motor command over an efferent nerve to initiate the withdrawal movement (picture 3)
- Extended to a biological principles - all muscular function other than respiration, cardiac activity and irritability depends on reflexes controlled by the spinal cord
2.The growing impact of the reflex
How was the reflex arc considered the basis of mental functioning?
Physiologist, Sechenov, claimed in his book Reflexes of the brain that all higher functions of the brain were of a reflex nature
↪ Inhibition was considered a God-given ability (from sex, adultery…) but Sechenov in his book explained it as a neuronal reflex
2.The growing impact of reflexes
How did Sechenov influence Pavlov?
Pavlov (Sechenov’s student) was studying reflex mechanisms in the digestive system - the dog salivated and Pavlov described it as a psychic reflex = the reflex arc as a basis of psychological functioning
↪ influence on the behaviourist motion which focused fully on S-R relationship (later Skinner)
- But some scientists (James, Dawey) rather suggested that not all thoughts consisted of reflexesn - incompatible with the existence of human consciousness and free will
3.The localisation of brain functions
What was the localisation theory and where did it start?
Brain processes are localised, meaning that only part of the brain underlies a particular mental function
Started with Franz Jospeh Gall (organology and granioscopy) and his student Johann Spurzheim (prenology)
3.The localisation of brain functions
Describe organology, craniology and phrenology
Organology: differences in predisposition can be seen in cortical development: welldeveloped function, larger cortical area
Cranioscopy: differences in cortical development can be seen in modules of the skull (e.g. language module)
Phrenology: conceptualised the two concepts and suggested that mental function were localised in the brain and that the capacity of a function corresponded to the size of the brain part devoted to it
3.The localisation of brain functions
Who was Flourens and what did he argue?
Flourens conducted very good experiments with animals (kept them alive for hours/days) enabling him to see what the behavioural effects of his interventions on the brain
- Based on his experiments he argued against the localization theory by saying that there is localization of function in brainstem but not in cortex
- Cortex was still a functional whole
- Equipotentiality theory: psychological functions are indivisible properties of the cortex as a whole
- If a small part of the cortex was removed, there was no isolated function lost (as long as the lesion was not too large, so that the remaining tissue could take over)
3.The localisation of brain functions
What disocovery of which people provided lot of evidence for the localization theory?
- Broca examined a brain of a patient who died but had problems with speech production (was only able to say ‘tan’) and found widespread damage to his left frontal lobe
- Wernicke provided evidence that problems with understanding language occur after damage to the rear part of the left hemisphere
3.The localisations of brain areas
What further evidence for the localisation theory did Fritz and Hitzing provide?
Conducted experiments on dogs where they stimulated their cortex and observed differing physical responses in different parts of the body depending on which part of the cortex was stimulated
- evidence for the fact that cortex can be stimulated and that there are several (motor) areas
- experimental evidence against Flourens
3.The localisation of brain functions
Who was Robert Bartholow and what did he do?
He was the first one to conduct electrical stimulation(on brain and other parts of the body) on humans in his electrical rooms
- 30-year-old Mary Rafferty first human who was electrically stimulated in the brain (part of her skull was missing because of a brain tumor)
- She died during the experiments due to an epileptic seizure → for 15 years no one wanted to do electrical stimulation on humans again
- But later surgeons started using electrical stimulation to treat brain injuries
Disenchantment of the brain
What does Max mean by the disenchantment of the brain? What fueled it
Second half of 19th century, with the localisation theory gaining ground, the idea of the soul being the divine entity looses its credibility (= disenchantment of the brain)
- Darwin with his book on natural selection and the idea of the neuronal reflex fueled this movement
Disenchantment of the brain
How did Herbert Spencer contribute to this idea?
He coined ‘Survival of the fittest’
- All structures - from societies to brain structures - evolve from undifferentiated and homogeneous to differentiated and heterogeneous (more complexity) = development
- This idea was applied by John Hughlings Jackson
Disenchantment of the brain
How did John Hughlings Jackson contribute to the idea?
- Establised that central nervous system has different levels of sensori-motor units
- The evolutionary oldest are at the bottom of the brain
- The evolutionary newest (more complex, more differentiated and more flexible) areas are at the top
- Higher areas integrate input from lower areas
- Higher mental processes (‘will, memory, reason, and emotion’) found their origin in sensori-motor nervous arrangements (we can explain the simple things by the smallest, basic units but when we combine those, we get the complex processes)
Disenchantment of the brain
How did Jackson apply his ideas of sensori-motor nervous arrangements to clinical practice?
- Higher areas control the lower areas
- Clinical basic assumption: if area fails due to damage, the function also fails
- But: sometimes damage resulted in new behavior and he called that release from control → Cortical areas could no longer control, lower areas were given free play
↪ dissolution: opposite of evolution (went from complexity to more basic, simpler behaviour)
↪ E.g. observed in neurological & psychiatric disorders but also in drunkenness