Lecture 6: early childhood Flashcards

1
Q

Early childhood

A

Ages 2-6
Height weight: more important to follow curve then be quote on quote normal
Physical growth happends during this time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

CHildhood obesity

A

COmmon in western countries

1 standard deviation above age group: overweight

2 standarf deviations above age group: obesity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

SHort-term risks arising from childhood obesity

A

Blount’s disease (boweld legs, sore joints)
Asthma
Sleep disturbance (apnea)
Increased intracranial pressure (fat in brain)
Gallstones
Hepatitis
Diabetes/insulun resistance
Menstrual abnormalities (start very early or will not start, hormonal effects)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Lon-term risks arising from childhood obesity

A

Increased risk of:
- Premature death
- Noncommunicable diseases
- Heart diseases
- Stroke
- Osteoarthritis
- Cancer

Lots of physical risk in childhood obesity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Social risks arising from childhood obesity

A
  • Teasing, discrimination
  • Stereotyped as lazy, clumsy, awkward, ugly
  • Unpopular
  • Major problems with body image, especially in girls
  • Long-term: poorer academics, less likely to get post-secondary education, lower salaries
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fear of fatness

A
  • 5 yr olds feat gaining weight
  • Almost 50% of US children in grades 1-3 would like to be thinner
  • 50% of 3rd grade girls tried a diet
  • 70% of adolescent girls have atempted to lose weight
    (gieters have a 8x increased chance of eating disorder)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Influences that cause childhood obesity

A

Food advertisement in children

Less nutritious food cheaper

Over consumption

Decline in physical activity

Community environment inhibits active living

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Piaget’s stages of cognitive development

A

Sensorimotor intelligence (birth-2yrs)

Pre-operational thought (2-7 yrs old)

Concrete Operations (7-11)

Formal operational (11/12 yrs on)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Pre-operational period

A

Thinking

Can form representation, but limited
+ Centration
+Fooled
+ Egocentric

Symbolic activity
+ Language
+ Deferred imitation
+ Make-believe play
++Becomes detached from real-life conditions over time
++Becomes less self-centred over time (pretending they drink milkshake, eventually pretenddoll drink milkshake)
++Becomes more complex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evidence of representation

A

Dual representation: viewing an object as an object and a symbol
- Snoopy test: Demonstrated by 3-yr olds but not 2 1/2 - yr old: little room object is hidden, find in big room.
- Note that we see this age-related change reflected in make-believe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Animistic thinking

A

The sun was angry so it chased the clouds away (lets turn the tv off its tired)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Egocentrism

A

3 mountains problem

After walking around the display, child is seated opposite a doll

Task: which picture shows what the doll would see?

Unable to take on other ppls perspectives

Piagets experiment with the mountains was to complex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Conservation

A

Piaget: conservation most important development of this period

Problems with conservation:
- Innability to understand reversibility
- Centration, appearance
- States vs. transformations (static)

- Even though something has changed in appearence its still the same
- Number, volume, mass, lengh: all differnet types of conservation
- Dont understand reversibility idea
- Fosuses on one aspect (its taller) - centration
- Focuses on state: in the moment, dont think about how they got to that state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Preoperational Stage

A

For summary of different types of conservation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Was Piaget right?

A

Evidence for different outcomes if problems are simplified
- His tasks tend to confusing, unfamiliar elements and many pieces of information

Many naturally-occuring instances of effective reasoning in preschoolers

For egocentrisms proved wrong: toddlers talk to babies wih a baby voice and adults in a normal voice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Egocentrism

A

Inclusion of familiar objects, using methods other than picture selection show that 3- and 4-year-olds understand other perspectives
- updated experiment

Everyday situation: preschoolers adapt speech to suit audience

We can simplify design of egocentrism

Little police man and little girl hide from police

Mature out of egocentrism quicker then wa<hat piaget thought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Animastic thinking

A

More common for items that move and have headlights (e.g train)

Less common for familar objects they interact directly with ( e.g crayon) than less interaective objects (e.g. moon)

Kids try to figure out if different things r living

18
Q

Conservation

A

Number:
6 items - no conservation
3 items - conservation

Familiarity:
- Can conserve checkers
- Can conserve playdough

If familiar with task they can conserve it more easily

19
Q

Effect of language

A

Show kids a rock painted like an egg and a real egg
- Verbal test: is it rly truly an egg? (until 6 or 7 they say yes)
- Physical test: choose the object that is rly truly an egg (by age 3 most kids choose the egg, not the rock)

Physical test: take away language complexity

20
Q

So…was piaget right

A

partly

CHildren do have some logical reasoning skills, but they r limited and fragile

A heavy focus on language could lead to underestimates of what children understand

21
Q

Vygotsky’s theory

A

Social learning: other people influence what a child understands and can do!

Mentors

Scaffolding
- Zone of Proximal Development
(difference between what they can do alone vs. with help)

When in a stage, we can measure what they can do alone and what they can do with help
- Zygotsky

my notes:
If in zone of proximal development children cant figure task out without scafollding
If they dont have help they get frustrated or give up. Scaffolding they get engaged and big growth in understanding

22
Q

Theory of mind

A

An individual’s understanding of their own mind and other people’s minds

An understanding that behaviour is driven by mental stages which are influenced by beliefs, desires, and intentions

AN understanding that what one thinks is true and what is actually true might not be the same

An understanding that someone else’s belief will not be necessarily be the same as one’s own

Developing of theory of mind
- Theory of mind can be defined in a variety of ways
- Understanding that the way that we behave

23
Q

THeory of mind began as a developmental question but now ToM has been incroporated into the study of

A

autism, alcoholism, schizophrenia, brain injuries, typically developing children and adults, animals,…

Used as an explanation of autism

24
Q

Measuting ToM

A

False belief: a belief based on inaccurate info

If child ToM, can realise that without the accurate info, ppl will act according to their false beliefs

Child must be able to differentiate between his own beliefs, and those of others

25
Q

Unexpected tranfer test: ToM test

A

Child knows its in the fridge: they have true belied

Maxi has the false belief

If child has theory of mind they will answer in the covert

26
Q

How to test a true belief and why we decide to test false belief

A

What would a true belief be: if mom tells maxi
- They will look in the fridge
Hard to test true belief, that is why we test the false belief

27
Q

Why do children fail

A

Is it because they havent yet developed strong metacognitive skills?
- metacognitition: the ability to think about your own thinking
- Smarties box task: can they even correctly state one of their true beliefs in the past? (Deceptive box): before u saw what was inside the box what did you think was inside
- By simplifyng the languge: what did you think was inside the box before we opened the lid, 3 yr olds answered correcly

28
Q

Can children use false beliefs to their advantage?

A

Yes - if they have ToM

Child told to hide car

No ToM: child drives it over, hides it, and isn’t concerned with the tracks

ToM: wipes away tracks, and some also create misleading tracks to another spot

also children lie when they have false belief

29
Q

ToM and age

A

Piaget would have said ToM develops after the preoperational stage, when kids move beyond egocentrism

But the number of children who can solve false belief tasks increases sharply at 4 yrs!
- Some evidence that younger children have preliminary ToM:t it is performance limitations not absence of ToM ( modified false belief task: triangle and square)
- most 3 yrs old and some 2 yrs old will look in direction of person , dont need verbal response

30
Q

Language and ToM

A

Development of ToM correlated with language develpment

Meta-analysis: overall language abilities ccounted for 17-18% of the variance in false belief task performance

31
Q

Experience and ToM: Specific language experiences

A

Measured how moms interacted with 33 months olds
- With some, narratives included a lot of references to psychological motives
- With others, narratives reffered to behaviour, without reference to underlying motives

Tested 6 months later on false belief task
- Children with motives experience did better than those without it

32
Q

Ezpereince and ToM: Hearing-imapired children
and
large families

A

Hearing-impaired chldren with hearing parents are delayed in their development of ToM relative to hearing-impaired children with hearing-impaired parents

Large fams:
Earlier ToM from interactions and arguments with sibilings, understanding their mental states

33
Q

Implications of ToM for social interactions and status

A

ToM correlated with more prosocial behaviour
- Cooperating, helping, comforting

Correlation is pretty consistent
- Stronger for girls than boys
- Stronger for kids 6+ that for kids 2-5 yrs old

Longitudinal work shows that ToM correlates with popularity among peers

34
Q

Self-concept

A

The set of attributes, abilities, attitudes, values that one sees as defining oneself

Starts to develop in preschool yrs

Influenced by cognitive development

Influences interactions with others
- mine when playing with toys (stronger self-concept leads to more possessive behaviour)

35
Q

Self-concept

A

Early: focus on what child enjoys and owns

Later: Focus on personality characteristics

36
Q

Self-esteem

A

starts to develop arround age 4

Not very accurate - kids ofen think their rly good at everything (inflated self-esteem arround 4)

Kids who are criticixed or not supported in their attemps stop trying new things (drop of self-esteem)

37
Q

Play

A

Important for all kinds of development
- Story-telling, physical, disappointement, compromising, memory, sharing, creativity, emotional regulation and recognition

38
Q

On ur own

A

Be familiar with different styles of parenting and their consequences

Be familiar with different types of aggression (table 6.3)

39
Q

Parenting styles

A

1) Authoritarian parenting: word is law, kids dont rly communicate with parents
2) Permissive parents: leaninient, listen to kids
3) Authoritative parenting: Set limits but are flexible
4) Neglectful/uninvolved parents: dont care about kids

40
Q

four forms of aggression

A

1) Instrumental aggression: Hurtful behavior aimed at gaining smt (apparent ages 2-6 quite normal, more egocentric than antisocial)
2) Reactive aggression: Impulsive retalition for a hurt that can be verbal or physical - lack of emotional regulation - 2yr olds, 5yr olds can control
3) Relational aggression: nonphysical acts, insults, social rejection - diretly antisocial
4) Bullying aggression: unprovoked, repeated physical or verbal attack, especially on victims who are unlikely to defend themselves