Lecture 6 - DIRECTED ENERGY DEPOSITION Flashcards
Understand the Direct Energy Deposition Process • Know the different beam energy sources and feedstock types • Advantages and disadvantages of the process • Applications for the Direct Energy Deposition Process
Describe Direct energy deposition
Focused thermal energy is used to fuse
materials by melting as the material is being deposited.
list the 3 energy sources for this process
Laser
Electron beam
Plasma arc
Laser beams pros cons
pros - Highly intense – Highly directiaonal – Cheaper and more flexible – Does not require a vacuum environment
cons
– Inert atmosphere required
Electron beam Pros/cons
– Fast deposition rates
– Very interesting to space-based applications
• Electron beams are much more efficient at converting
electrical energy into a beam which conserves scarce
resourses.
• Work well in a vacuum
• Powder inherently difficult to use in a zero gravity environment
so wire feed used
Plasma beam
Has been used in combination with milling to produce 3D structures.
– Larger heat-affected-zone and process control issues have kept this
approach from widespread commercialization
LENS process - draw pic
See notes
LENS- Descirbe
Deposits are typically made in
a controlled argon atmosphere (no oxygen)
• Sheath gas compresses
powder stream
EBAM- Draw pic
SEE NOTES
EBAM - describe
- Electron beam to create melt pool
- Requires a vacuum environment
- Wire fed
List 2 feedstocks and describe
Powder
Most versatile feedstock
– Most metals and ceramics are available in powder form
– Not all powder is captured in the melt pool (i.e. less than 100% powder
capture efficiency)
Wire fed – 100% capture efficiency – Higher porosity – Harder to achieve 3D geometry – Cheaper than powder for identical material
Single nozzle vs 4 nozzle
Single nozzle system
– Cheaper to produce
– Slower deposition rate
4 nozzle system
– 90° separation
– Faster deposition rates
– Wider range of alloys
LENS describe Mechanical properties/micro structure controll
small melt pool cools fast leading to fine grains similar to wrought products
Can controll microstructre by changing print parameters.
Pros of LENS (Laser-Engineered-Net-Shaping)
pros
Fine microstructure results in high hardness equivalent to wrought parts
diverse control of microstructure
Very high density parts
Functionally graded metals
Good “buy-to-fly” ratio as not alot of high performance alloy is wasted
Faster deposition rates than Powder Bed Fusion
Cons of LENS (Laser-Engineered-Net-Shaping)
Cons
X Requires an inert atmosphere or vacuum environment
X Poor resolution and surface roughness
X Cannot produce as complex structures as say powder bed process
Applications of LENS
Part production
Repair
Adding new features too existing parts