Lecture 6 (causation, variation, stat sig) Flashcards

1
Q

Types of asso

A
  • Noncausal asso (flaw –> bias)
  • Noncausal asso (confounding)
  • Random asso (random variation)
  • Causal asso
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Internal validity

A
  • Assessing design, execution, analysis

- Was it done right or was asso due to bias/confounding/random var?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

External validity

A
  • Generalizability
  • Reqs internal validity
  • Externally valid if asso = result of basic human physiology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Types of causes (2, not combos)

A
  • Necessary: must precede, w/o which doesn’t develop

- Sufficient: leads to disease, but w/o which disease could develop due to smtg else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Types of causes (combos)

A
  • Necessary and sufficient: very rare
  • Necessary but not sufficient: all req’d
  • Sufficient but not necessary: exposure alone causes, but so do others
  • Neither: most chronic diseases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Criteria for causality

A
  • Temporal relationship
  • Strength of asso
  • Dose-response
  • Replication of findings
  • Biologic plausibility
  • Consider alternate explanations
  • Cessation of exposure
  • Specificity of disease
  • Consistency w/other knowledge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Inarguable criteria for causality

A

-Temporal relationship: exposure must precede onset of disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Strength of asso: what does it means for causality

A
  • Stronger asso less likely to be explained by confounding

- But weak assos can be causal, strong assos can be non-causal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Overall assessment of asso btwn alc + breast cancer

A
  • Temporality: yes
  • Strength: weak (<2)
  • Dose-response: yes
  • Replication: yes (many not stat sig though)
  • Biologic plausibility: some
  • Alt explanations considered: yes
  • Cessation: no ev
  • Specificity: no
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Point estimate

A

-Estimate of the asso a study is measuring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Test of stat sig

A

-Prob that an asso occurred due to random variation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

P value (def and what it means when not sig)

A
  • Prob that asso at least as large as that observed could occur by chance
  • When it’s not sig: doesn’t mean it was due to random chance, ev just not strong enough to reject/accept Ho
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Sig level

A

-Prob that a sig asso will occur when there really is none

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Type I error

A

-Rejectct Ho when it’s really true
-Saying asso exists when it really doesn’t
=alpha

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Confidence Interval (def and benefits)

A
  • Interval that, w/given prob, contains true value

- Provide more info than p-value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Power (def and formula)

A

-Prob that study will demonstrate an asso if it truly exists

=1-beta

17
Q

Beta

A

-Prob that a true asso will not be observed

18
Q

Type II error

A
  • Failing to reject false Ho

- Saying asso doesn’t exist when it really does

19
Q

What determines power

A
  • Incidence (cohort): max when 1/2 develop
  • Prev of exposure (case-control): max when 1/2 exposed
  • Strength of true asso
20
Q

alpha

A

-Give % of assos expected to be sig due to chance alone (when studying multiple)