Lecture 6 Flashcards

1
Q

What is drug related harm

A

Drug-related harm:
directly or indirectly affects the health, safety, security, social functioning and productivity of all Australians.

Drug-related harms cause or contribute to:  
illness and disease
accident and injury
violence and crime
family and social disruption
economic costs and workplace concerns.

Illicit drug-related harms include:
prosecution and conviction
involvement in production and distribution of illicit drugs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Harms: Misconceptions

The ‘addictive nature’ / dependence of a substance causes them to be harmful

A

The ‘addictive nature’ / dependence of a substance causes them to be harmful
Level of addictiveness does vary
Nicotine and heroin most likely lead to dependence (Anthony, Warner & Kessler, 1994)
Chemical nature and addictive qualities do not, on their own, determine harm caused
Use leads to dependence and serious problems in a minority of cases (McAllister, Moore & Makkai, 1991)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Harms: Misconceptions

2. Harm most associated with illicit drugs

A

Estimates of economic costs associated with licit and illicit drug use
Tobacco 56.2%
Alcohol: 27.3%
Illicit drugs: 14.6%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Harm: Misconceptions

3.Harms primarily affect the individual user

A

For every heavy/frequent drinker, at least four others are negatively affected (Rumbold & Hamilton, 1998)
Contribute to and reinforce social disadvantage
Major impact on families through neglect, violence, separation, financial and legal problems (Dietze, Laslett & Rumbold, 2004)
Children are more likely: to develop behavioural & emotional problems, poorer school performance, victim of child maltreatment.
Work performance via absenteeism, loss of productivity, work accidents (ABS, 1998)
Up to 70% of crime related to substance use (House of Representatives, 2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Potential areas of harm

A
Acquisition 
Administration 
Context 
Relationships with others / societal
Intoxication, regular  use, dependence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Harm minimisation in Australia

A

1984: Bob Hawke – daughters heroin addiction

1985: Drugs in Australia: National Action Workshop
Workshop report: ‘While there are still the traditional polarised views on the use of drugs, there is now increasingly a common ground within the Australian community on appropriate action on the abuse of drugs’
(Brown et al 1986, 182)

1998: Howard government landmark decision to embark on its “Tough on Drugs“ policy and to override a Ministerial Council on Drug Strategy decision to support a trial of the use of prescribed heroin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The National Drug StrategyA framework for action on alcohol, tobacco,and other drugs

A

Mission: To build safe and healthy communities by minimising alcohol, tobacco and other drug-related health, social and economic harms among individuals, families and communities.

Overall national commitment to the harm minimisation approach. In the implementation of harm minimisation, jurisdictions will have programs, initiatives and priorities reflecting local circumstances and areas of responsibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

PRIORITIES FOR THE NATIONAL DRUG STRATEGY

A

The Priorities for the National Drug Strategy (1) are:
Community engagement and involvement in identifying and responding to issues.
Improve national coordination for identifying and addressing drug use and its harms, sharing jurisdictional information on innovative approaches, and developing effective responses.
Develop and share data and research that support evidence informed approaches.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Harm minimisation

A

Harm minimisation:
policy and programs which prioritises the aim of decreasing the negative effects of drug use (Newcombe, 1992)
Range of options aiming to improve health, social and economic outcomes for individuals and communities.

Harm reduction:
strategies, interventions & policies by which the principles of harm minimisation are implemented
Premise:
drug use brings a particular balance of harms & benefits to individuals & the community
knowledge of the risks of behaviour does not automatically lead to changes in behaviour

Accepts:
drug use has always existed & will continue to exist
completely eradicating drug use is impossible
continued focus on eradicating drug problems may result in more harm for society
Objectives
Identification of harmful consequences for individuals, those around them & the community
Implement strategies to reduce this harm
Focuses primarily on reducing harm, not use.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Demand Reduction

A

. to prevent the uptake and/or delay the onset of use of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs; reduce the misuse of alcohol and the use of tobacco and other drugs in the community; and support people to recover from dependence and reintegrate with the community

  1. prevent uptake and delay onset of drug use
  2. reduce use of drugs in the community
  3. support people to recover from dependence and reconnect with the community
  4. support efforts to promote social inclusion and resilient individuals, families and communities.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

National Drug Strategy priority (2):

A

Develop new and innovative responses to prevent uptake, delay the first use and reduce harmful levels of alcohol, tobacco and other drug use, including:
Building community knowledge of alcohol, tobacco and other drug-related harms to encourage cessation and reduce harmful use
Increasing access to treatment services, including new approaches responding to emerging issues
Facilitating treatment service planning and responsibility for implementation between levels of government
Exploring effective price mechanisms shown to reduce uptake and use
Reducing exposure to licit drugs, particularly for young people and adolescents, through regulation of promotion and marketing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Supply reduction

A

to prevent, stop, disrupt or otherwise reduce the production and supply of illegal drug, & control, manage and/or regulate the availability of legal drugs

Aims: to reduce the supply of particular drugs within society, or restrict access of particular drugs to certain people

“If a drug is not available then the community will not be troubled by its use”

reduce the supply of illegal drugs (both current and emerging)
control and manage the supply of alcohol, tobacco and other legal drugs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

National Drug Strategy priority (3):

A

Develop responses that restrict or regulate the availability of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs, including:
Identifying and responding to challenges arising from new supply modes through the internet, postal services and other emerging technologies
Working with those at the point of supply for licit drugs, chemicals and equipment to minimise their misuse and opportunities for diversion to unlawful use
Identifying and responding to new methods for illicit drug production and supply
Supporting nationally consistent legislative and regulatory responses, particularly for international border control and challenges inhibiting inter-jurisdictional collaboration
Enhancing use and sharing of intelligence to identify and respond to emerging trends and issues.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Harm reduction

A

to reduce the adverse health, social and economic consequences of the use of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs.

  1. reduce harms to community safety and amenity
  2. reduce harms to families
  3. reduce harms to individuals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Some more examples of harm minimisation in AOD work practice

A

Encourage abstinence and consumption reduction (moderation)
Provide accurate and factual information about AOD – impacts, risks, consequences
Information about safety issues – drug, method, context
IVDU – not sharing, safe disposal, non-injecting routes of administration
Risk behaviours – safer sex, not driving
Resuscitation in case of overdose in their presence
Regular health checks
General lifestyle factors – sleep, diet, balance of activities
Crisis service contacts (e.g. 24 hours)
Engagement and therapeutic relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

National Drug Strategy priority (4):

A

Enhancing harm reduction approaches, including:
Providing opportunities for intervention amongst high prevalence or high risk groups, including the implementation of settings based approaches to modify risk behaviours
Monitoring emerging drug issues to provide advice to the health, law enforcement, education and social services sectors for informing individuals and the community regarding risky behaviours
Continuing evidence based strategies shown to reduce blood borne virus, decrease road trauma, reduce passive smoking exposure, and decrease overdose risk,
Enhancing systems to facilitate greater diversion into health interventions from the criminal justice system, particularly for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, or other at risk populations who may be experiencing disproportionate harm
Increasing access to pharmacotherapy demonstrated to reduce drug dependence, and encourage treatment engagement and compliance.

17
Q

Sub-strategies

A

National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples Drug Strategy
National Alcohol Strategy
National Tobacco Strategy
National Illicit Drugs Strategy
National Pharmaceutical Drug Misuse Strategy
National Workforce Development Strategy
National Drug Research and Data Strategy.

18
Q

Priority populations

A

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People
People with mental illness
Young people
Older people
People in contact with the cirminal justice system
Culturally and Linguistically diverse populations
People identifying as gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender or intersex

19
Q

Measures of success

A

Average age of uptake of drugs, by drug type
Recent use of any drug, people living in households
Arrestees’ illicit drug use in the month before committing an offence for which charged
Victims of drug related incidents
Drug related burden of disease, including mortality

20
Q

Outcomes of the NDS

A

Fewer Australians are smoking / exposed to second-hand smoke
Daily smoking decreased
bans on advertising, bans on smoking in enclosed public spaces and significant investments in public education and media campaigns.

Fewer people using illegal drugs
recent use fell from 22% (1998) to 13.4% (2010)
Cannabis fell from 17.9 % (1998) to 9.1% (2010)

21
Q

Criticisms of the National Drug Strategy

A

Harms continue to happen

Change of presenting problem / Increased poly-drug use

Query funding focused on anti-drug education

Lack of innovation e.g. prescribed heroin trials

No influence on HCV transmission

22
Q

Fun fact

A

Every year some 400 Australians die from illicit drug usage. Thousands of others suffer the short and long term health consequences of drug dependence, unsafe injecting practices and infections. Their families suffer with them from these consequences. Discussion of drug policy in recent years has been largely absent from the Australian political agenda except as an excuse for being tough on law and order.”

23
Q

More drug crap

A

Over allocation of additional resources to Federal Police, National Crime Authority and Customs
Little long term impact on prevalence of use, and even less impact on the harms associated with use (APS, 2008)
Eg increase in Oceania cocaine use, from 1.4–1.7% in 2009 to 1.5–1.9% in 2010 (reflected rise in Australia) with use remaining stable in Europe.
Lang (2004):
Temporary ST decrease in use
Negated impact: supply sources find other destinations; new supply routes; drug substitution
Little reduction in usage overall & other harms introduced (increased criminality & less emphasis on health harms)
Drug trafficking (UN, 2008):
10-15% heroin & 30% cocaine is intercepted worldwide
At least 70% needs to be intercepted to have an impact
Continues to increase due to expanding market and poverty; $400 billion (US) trade; 300% profits

24
Q

Identified challenges in NDS

A

Risky drinking, drinking to intoxication and alcohol-related disease, injury and violence
estimated 813 072 Australians (15+) hospitalised for alcohol-attributable injury and disease from 1995-2005
leading cause of Australian road deaths,

Smoking rates are unacceptably & particularly among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people
The Council of Australian Governments (COAG) & National Healthcare Agreement goal of reducing prevalence to 10% & halving rate in ATSI people
Rates also high in other sub-groups

25
Q

More

A

Changing trends & patterns of use of, & harms from, illegal drugs
Increasing harms from cannabis.
Increase in hospital presentations for cannabis related issues for older people / nearly doubled among users aged 30–39.
Hospital presentations for cannabis-induced psychosis were highest among users aged 20–29.
Outpatient treatment episodes for cannabis related problems increased by 30%
Cannabis cultivation continues to be an activity of interest for organised crime.
Continuing high demand for ecstasy and domestic production of amphetamine type stimulants (ATS).
Expansion of cocaine
Rates of heroin and other injecting drug use have stabilised at low levels, harms persist
‘analogue’ drugs – internet sales; many have not yet been captured under the drug law schedules which govern their legal status.
Polydrug use
Pharmaceutical misuse

26
Q

Of the combined drug response budget from Commonwealth and State governments:

A

55% is spent on law enforcement (supply reduction)
23% spent on prevention (demand reduction)
17% on treatment (demand reduction)
5% on harm reduction

27
Q

Current situation – debate continues

A

Global Commission “War on Drugs” has failed
Australia21 report
Treating drugs as criminal acts has driven their production / consumption underground & built a criminal industry
Defining personal use as criminal acts avoids responsibility to regulate and control the quality of substances that are in widespread use.
Some illicit drugs have health benefits. Many are highly addictive and harmful when used repeatedly – like alcohol and nicotine
Deaths continue, most crime is associate with use, criminalised for recreational / experimental behaviours
Consider that prohibition is ineffective and to consider a range of alternative approaches – with community engagement and discussion

28
Q

Tensions:Reducing harm verses reducing use

A

Reducing harm verses reducing use
recognises abstinence as one of many strategies
acknowledges that abstinence is insufficient on its own
other strategies are needed as a more realistic alternative to abstinence or as a step toward future abstinence
different strategies will suit different people at different times, and that a wide range of strategies is required

29
Q

Tensions: Harm minimisation is opposed to law enforcement

A

demand reduction and supply control strategies are an integral part of the overall approach
Law enforcement can adopt harm reduction:
Support other harm reduction strategies (e.g. needle and syringe programs)
Improve links between police & treatment services
Cautioning & diversion schemes
Changing legal status of drug or policing attitudes & behaviour (e.g. cannabis)

30
Q

Summary

A

Not all alcohol and other drug use is harmful, but the use of any substance, legal or illegal, has the potential to cause harm.
Harmful effects can occur from acquisition, context, method of use, intoxication, regular use and dependence

Prohibition / law enforcement nor prevention through information & education have been successful in curbing the supply or demand for drugs.

Attempts to reduce the adverse consequences of drug use are almost always successful, while attempts to eliminate harm are often inadvertently counterproductive” (Wodak, 2000)