Lecture 6 Flashcards

1
Q

how to interpret a single error bar

> 95% confidence interval

A

95% confidence interval

NOT: if i would replicate the procedure 100 times, 95 sample means would occur within original 95% CI

BUT: if i replicate the procedure 100 times, I expect 95 of the 95% CI would contain mu

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

error bar of 1 SEM: how big is the confidence interval?

A

1 SEM error bar: 67% confidence interval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

assessing significance in graphs

(between subjects design)

> rule of thumb for SEM

> role of thumb for 95% CI

A

rule of thumb for SEM:

> significant if minimally 1 SEM fits in between the error bars of both groups

rule of thumb for 95% CI:

> significant if the overlap of the error bars of both groups is smaller than 25% of the length of both CI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why do we need to use different rules of thumb for between/within subject designs?

A

the error term in within subjects designs derives from the participants x factor interaction

> no fixed relationship between error bars and interaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

relational research

> no dependent / independent variable, but…?

A

relational resarch:

> predictor and criterion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the two main measures in relational research?

> what kind of data?

A
  1. pearsons product -moment correlation coefficient r

> between two continuous, normally distributed variables

  1. spearmans rank-order correlation coefficient rs

> between two ordinal variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

you observe r(x,y) = 0

> what can you conclude`?

A

r(x,y) = 0

> no relationship between x and y

> insufficient power i.e. type 2 error

> truncated range prevents the expression of a relationship

> the relationship between x and y is not linear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

you observe r(x,y,) =! 0

> what can you conclude

A

r(x,y) =! 0

> there is a linear relationship between x and y in the population

> type 1 error

> an outlier caused the relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the use of spearmans rank order correlation coefficient?

A

spearmans rank order correlation coefficient

> using rank ordered scores, rS is more resistant to outliers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

regression model:

how does SStotal look as a regression line

A

SS total:

> horizontal regression line at Ymean

> the sum of the squared deviations of each data point to Ymean

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

regression model:

> how does SSerror look like as a regression line

A

SSerror

> deviations from the actual regression line that fits the data best

> also called SS residual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how can you describe the amount of explained variance using SS?

A

proportion variance explained = r²

r² = (SStotal - SSresidual) / SStotal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

under which circumstances is it possible to prove causality using linear regression?

A

general issues of experimental research

+ manipulation independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly