Lecture 6 Flashcards

1
Q

Who was the chamberlain who ruled behind the emperor during Arcadius’ reign?

A

Arcadius was so inept, that he was more of a puppet ruler, and subject to wishes and political ambitions of his palace chamberlain (chief of staff), Eutropius

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who was John Chrysostom’s mom?

A

Anthusa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who had trained John Chrysostom as an orator?

A

He had been trained as a lawyer in his native Antioch, by the pagan orator Libanius

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who trained John Chrysostom in theology?

A

He also studied theology in Antioch under Diodore of Tarsus (died c.390)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Diodore of Tarsus (died c.390)

A

Diodore was the leader of the Antiochene tradition of theology:
o Emphasis on literal and historical exegesis (as opposed to Allegorical)
o Against Appollinarius, he insisted on the complete humanity of Christ

  • Diodore ruled a Monastery in near Antioch, until the Arian Controversy drew him to the city in order to combat it
  • He became bishop of Tarsus in 378
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did John do after Anthusa’s death?

A

After his mother’s death, he became an Anchorite monk (c.373-c.381)
• Spent two years in solitude practicing monasticism
• He followed the rules of Pachomius
• He was so strict, that his health was compromised for the rest of his life (he refused to eat, or sleep, had digestive problems for the rest of his life).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Bishop Flavian appointed John Chrysostom to preach. Who did he direct his preaching to?

A

His preaching was directed at the nominal Christians of his day, especially clergy and royalty—a theme that he continued his entire career.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who did Arcadius marry when Theodosius died?

A

Arcadius married the Empress Eudoxia—arranged by Eutropius

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Upon becoming bishop of Constatinople, what did John Chrysostom set out to do?

A

He attempted to reform the morally apathetic city and quickly earned a reputation for being “ascetic, aloof, energetic, and outspoken to the point of indiscretion, especially when he became excited in the pulpit.” (Chadwick)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who was the target of Chrysostom’s preaching?

A

• His sermons of reform seemed to target the Empress Eudoxia (among other members of the royal family)
o For example, Eudoxia had used her influence to commandeer some land which did not belong to her—and John preached against this issue in public
o She had him convicted by the Court of 29 charges, and removed from his See
o He was reinstated by the Court, but his preaching resumed, and he was deposed once and for all, despite support from powerful bishops in the west, and Pope Innocent I.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How did Chrysostom reform the church clergy and finances in Constantinople?

A

John’s Actions:
o Chrysostom ordered all priests to stop keeping these mistresses
o He fired many of the clergy unfit for the ministry
o John always ate alone (due to his weak stomach from the self-abuse suffered during his time as a monk)—many other bishops and clergy were offended that he did not invite them in for food and drink as Nectarius had done—false rumors circulated that John was hoarding all of wealth, food, and drink for himself.
o John offered only modest accommodations to visitors.

Chrysostom also attempted to organize Church finances:
• Most priests lived in luxury while church finances were a mess
• The care of the flock reflected the financial situation
• Chrysostom placed the care of finances under a system of detailed scrutiny
• Luxurious items from different bishops’ homes were sold to feed the hungry
• Priests were ordered to have church services at times that were not only convenient for the wealthy, but also for those who worked
• These measures gained for Chrysostom both respect and hatred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How did Eutropius’ control of Arcadius finally end?

A

Eutropius finally unleashed his fury on Chrysostom and his friends and followers
• Some fled the tyranny and sought refuge in the Hagia Sophia, the Church of Constantinople—the largest in Christendom
• John did not allow troops inside, Eutropius appealed to Arcadius, but John preached again, and this time Arcadius did not give in to Eutropius (Waldrop thinks Arcadius knew the truth).
• Eutropius eventually lost his power—and a mob chased after him
• He sought refuge in Hagia Sophia, and John gave him sanctuary and did not allow him to be harmed (WOW!)
• Thus, John clashed with the army, Eutropius, and the emperor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Epiphanius (c.315-403)

A

• A man by the name of Epiphanius (c.315-403), bishop of Salamis (Cyprus) was a fundamentalist who fought a group of Marcionites in his bishopric—and was disturbed by Origen’s pagan philosophy-inspired theology
o Epiphanius then condemned Origen, especially for interpreting literal meanings as spiritual symbols.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who led the Origenist group during the time of Chrysostom?

A

• Around the same time (370’s) there was an Origenist group, led by Ammonius and three “tall” brothers.
o They had fought the Arians and had suffered, esp. after the death of Athanasius, and were on good terms with the bishops of Alexandria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who did Theophilus of Alexandria support during the controversy between Epiphanius and the Tall Brothers?

A

At first, he sided with the Tall Brother. But after some remarks against Epiphanius, Epiphanius’ supporter’s marched on Alexandria. The Tall Brothers appealed to John Chrysostom. Theophilus saw John as a threat from that point on.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Theophilus do after the Tall Brothers appealed to Chrysostom?

A

He began to fuel the conspiracy that John was against Eudoxia. Basically, he saw him as an enemy, and was now looking for ways to get rid of him.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What happened when Theophilus and Eudoxia joined forces against Chrysostom?

A

Eudoxia and Theophilus of Alexandria, then plotted against Chrysostom:
• John was charged with ridiculous crimes
• He was banished by the emperor Arcadius
• A monk at heart, and ready for peace, Chrysostom gratefully prepared to leave
• People rioted when they realized John was leaving

c. An earthquake erupted soon after, and Eudoxia fearfully begged John to Return
• He returned to the pulpit amid shouts of joy and preached a triumphal sermon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

When John returned after exile, what did he do?

A

d. However, the issue of his straightforward preaching and insults towards the Royal (Eudoxia, kept slamming her) court had not been forgotten, and another plot was formed, and charges leveled:
• John was arrested again
• Many people rioted and some of the churches were burned
• Some of John’s friends were tortured by the government during questioning about the fire
• Chrysostom again surrendered in peace

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

When Innocent I heard that John had been exiled, what did he do? And why is this important?

A

b. The Bishop of Rome (Innocent I) came to his defense
c. The Pope appealed to Honorius, emperor of the west (the western counterpart to Arcadius)
• The Bishop’s delegation went to Constantinople
• They were arrested, imprisoned, bribed and tortured
• They were sent back to Rome in a leaky boat

This is an example of the growing tensions between the East and the West.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

How did John die?

A

d. Many of John’s friends were sent to exile
e. John was ordered moved to another, more remote, and cold place on the banks of the Black Sea
f. His guards, knowing that the emperor did not like him, pushed him beyond his strength and he became ill (he passed away because of this).

a. When he was about to die, he asked to be taken to a small church nearby:
• He took communion
• Bade farewell to those around him
• He preached a brief, but eloquent sermon: “In all things, Glory to God. Amen.”

Thirty one years later: the schism ended when John’s body was brought back to Constantinople, among great pomp and circumstance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Theodore of Mopsuestia (350-428)

A

Friend of John Chrysostom—studied with him at the Diodore’s school in Antioch

  1. Became bishop of Mopsuestia in 392
  2. He was Antioch’s leading biblical commentator and theologian (for a time)
    a. In his commentaries, he used scientific, critical, philological, and historical methods
    b. He completely rejected allegorical interpretation

Theodore REALLY emphasizes the humanity of Christ, and is deposed as a heretic at the Council of Ephesus (431) and II Constantinople (553).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Why was Theodore’s theology condemned?

A

Theodore was recognized as a great theologian near Antioch, while Apollinarius (Alexandrian hero) had been condemned

a. Thus, his Word-man Christology was being quietly undermined and attacked as closet adoptionism by the Alexandrians.
b. Theodore was anxious to safeguard the reality of Christ’s humanity which he rightly saw to be prejudiced by Apollinarianism (Chadwick)
c. However, his doctrines were condemned at the Councils of Ephesus (431) and II Constantinople (553).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

How did the Council of Constantinople contribute to the growing division between the East and the West?

A

A. The Council of Constantinople had declared that the patriarch of Constantinople should have the same type of power in east as the Bishop of Rome in the west (GROWING TENTION BETWEEN EAST AND WEST)

  1. This only heightened the controversy between Antioch and Alexandria
  2. Since Antiochene bishops usually took the seat more often than the Alexandrines, both schools continued to be bitter enemies.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is Nestorianism?

A

Nestorianism is the belief that there are two separate persons in Christ, a human one and a divine one. This is VERY typical of two natures theology that comes out of the Antioch school of theology. This theology also stresses the humanity of Christ.

The problem with Nestorius’ Christ is that he cannot account for the unity of Christ, because he makes two Christ (a human and a divine one).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What was Nestorius’ problem with Theotokos?

A

He preached an infamous sermon to stop calling Mary Theotokos (“God Bearer”)
• He said that Mary was not Theotokos (bearer of God), but that she was Christotokos (bearer of Christ)
o This seemed to imply that Jesus was not divine
• He said that it is wrong to give the name “God” to a baby (one who is two or three months old)

26
Q

In Nestorius’ problem with calling Mary the Theotokos, what is “synapheia”?

A

• If one affirms Mary as God-bearer, then the one who is born of her would not be sufficiently or fully human
• Yet, one must preserve the natural integrity of both Jesus’ real humanity and the real divinity in him
• He could not conceive of a human nature without a person attached to it.
• He posited a special kind of union that he called “synapheia—a conjunction”
o Jesus was a conjunction of divine nature—person and human-nature person in union so intimate and strong that it forms a new kind of entity like a whole that is greater than the sum of its parts

27
Q

What are the key similarities between Nestorianism and Adoptionism?

A

• The key similarity in both Nestorianism & Adoptionism: the Son of God never actually enters into human existence—as a result, Nestorius was condemned

28
Q

What was at the core tension between how the Antioch and Alexandria schools saw Christology?

A

The fight thus became: Nestorius (Antiochene school) vs. Bishop Cyril (Alexandrian School)

Antioch: Stressed the humanity of Christ, which usually led them to separate the divine and human.

Alexandria: Stressed the divinity of Christ, which usually led them to confuse the human and divine nature of Christ.

29
Q

Who was Nestorius’ main rival?

A

Cyril of Alexandria.

Bishop and Patriarch of Alexandria—an influential position due to the importance of the city
a. He was a distinguished and thoughtful theologian

b. But, he was very intolerant and violent
• He began his episcopate with a series of violent incidents
• His intolerance and violent actions, led to a series of violent riots between Christians and Jews in Alexandria
• In 415, the Neoplatonist philosopher (and a very brilliant woman), Hypatia, was murdered during the unrest

30
Q

What was Cyril’s take on Nestorius’ theology?

A

He considered the Christology of Nestorius to be a sophisticated form of adoptionism.

31
Q

What was the ambiguity in Cyril’s Christology?

A

Ambiguity in Cyril’s thought: anypostasia—impersonal: the Son of God formed the personality of Jesus Christ.

a. How does this differ from a brand of Apollinarianism?
b. What is a rational soul without a free personality?

32
Q

What happened at the Council of Ephesus of 431?

A
  1. Cyril and his loyal bishops arrived first, and waited for a few days:
    a. When no one else showed up, Cyril (who was the only patriarch present) called the council
    b. He read his 2nd letter to Nestorius (he had written a first letter) and criticized Nestorius’ Christological dualism
    c. The Council condemned both John of Antioch and Nestorius (as Patriarch of Constantinople) and Christology as heresy, and reinstated theotokos
  2. John of Antioch arrived and held a rival council of Ephesus
    a. They condemned Cyril and his formulas
    b. They reconfirmed Nestorius as Patriarch of Constantinople
  3. The bishops of the west arrived from Rome and joined Cyril and his council
    a. The council quickly ratified the earlier acts which condemned and deposed Nestorius
  4. The Emperor, then, pressured all parties to compromise:
    a. He deposed and condemned Nestorius
    b. Cyril preferred the “one nature after the union” formula, but reluctantly agreed to affirm: the “two natures” formula so long as the 2 natures in Christ are not divided
    c. He defended his compromise in a document known in Church History as the Formula of Reunion (433): that the 2 natures are only distinct in thought and not in reality.
    d. The Formula was signed by both Cyril of Alexandria and John of Antioch and ratified by the Emperor
    e. Nestorius was condemned to exile: first at a monastery in Antioch, then in a remote city in Petra (when he became an embarrassment to his friends in Antioch)
33
Q

Who was Eutyches, and what heresy did he come up with?

A

The heresy of Eutyches:
1. Eutyches was an elderly monk from Constantinople

  1. A strong supporter of the Alexandrian cause: the one nature of Christ
  2. He went one step beyond the language of Cyril and affirmed the process of the incarnation: “2 natures before the union but only 1 nature after or as a result of the union.”
    a. He held that: “Although the savior was of one substance (homoousios) with the Father, he was not of one substance with humanity.”
    b. He also seemed to say: Christ was from two natures before the union, but only one nature after the union. The result was:
34
Q

What is another word of Eutyches’ heresy?

A
  1. Monophysitism (Euthychianism): that Christ had one nature only
    a. The human nature of Christ was taken up and absorbed into the divine nature
    b. So that both natures were changed somewhat and a third kind of nature resulted:
  2. He refused to affirm that Christ was con-substantial with us humans
    a. A clear rejection of the Council of Nicea: which had declared Jesus both truly human and truly divine
    b. He reduced Christ’s humanity to a “drop of wine in the ocean of his deity.”
    c. He also suggested that right from the moment of conception in Mary, Jesus was a hybrid of humanity and divinity—a single divine-human nature—that mingled the 2 natures so that the human nature was overwhelmed and swallowed up by the divine
35
Q

What is Eutychianism similar to?

A

Docetism

36
Q

Robber’s Synod

A

A fake council that tried to uphold Eutychianism as true. The Alexandrians rejected any talk of two natures of Christ. Basically, the church of the East wanted a one-nature Christ.

H. Emperor Theodosius II called the second “Council of Ephesus” in 449

  1. Dioscorus: succeed Cyril as patriarch of Alexandria and opposed Eutyches
  2. The Council was intentionally swayed toward the Alexandrian side
  3. Pope Leo sent a delegate (Flavian) with a tome, but he was beaten and eventually died
  4. Leo called this synod “The Robber’s Synod”: because the arguments of the western Church were not heard
  5. The doctrine that there are “two natures in Christ” was declared heretical, as were all who defended the Antiochene position
    a. Anyone who disagreed with the decision could not be ordained
  6. Emperor Theodosius II, after being paid in gold by the Alexandrians, had considered the council ended.
  7. However, his horse stumbled and Theodosius fell and broke his neck.
37
Q

What happens that finally ends Eutychinism?

A

Theodosius was succeeded by his Sister Pulcheria and her husband Marcian—they sided with the Leo and the West. She called a new council: The Council of Chalcedon

38
Q

What was the Council of Chalcedon?

A

I. The Council of Chalcedon, 451(4th Ecumenical)
1. 500 bishops attended
2. The Council condemned both Nestorius and Eutyches
3. The truth on both sides (Alexandria and Antioch) were expressed while the extremes on both sides were avoided
a. Defeated Eutychism once and for all
b. Outcome: Christ is fully God and fully man; one person
4. Affirmed Tertullian’s formula—“two natures in one person”
5. Affirmed the decisions of Nicea (325); Constantinople (381); and Ephesus (431)
6. The Chalcedonian Definition:
a. The two main thinkers behind the Definition:
• Leo, Bishop of Rome (influenced by Tertullian)
• Cyril of Alexandria (Influenced by Athanasius)

b. It rejected the notion that the union destroyed “the difference of the two natures” and the view that the Savior is “divided into two persons”—rejected extreme Alexandrian and Antiochene positions

39
Q

Four Fences of Chalcedon

A

The heart of the statement is expressed by the “4 fences of Chalcedon” around the mystery of the hypostatic union—Christ’s 2 full and complete natures in one person: “without confusion; without change; without division; without separation.”

o “Without Confusion and Without Change”—against eutychanism and monophysitysm which tried to preserve the unity of person by creating a hybrid—a 3rd something

o “Without division and Without separation”—against Nestorius, who tried to stress the distinction between the humanity and divinity by tearing them apart into 2 different persons

40
Q

Why is the Council of Chalcedon important to the relations of he church in the east and west?

A

The results of Chalcedon and its Christological definition was permanent schism within the Eastern Church.

  • Parts of Syria and Persia held to “Nestorianism”—they were called Nestorian Churches
  • Most of the churches of Egypt also refused to accept the new faith and split from the Great Church to form Monophysite Churches (Monophysite: “believing in one nature”)
  • Monophysites: from the Greek, which means, “one nature.” These were Nestorians who rejected the doctrine of the “two natures”
41
Q

Monophysites

A

from the Greek, which means, “one nature.” These were Nestorians who rejected the doctrine of the “two natures”

42
Q

What other parties evolved after the Council of ChalcedoN/

A

a. Strict Dyophysites: moderate Antiochenes (ie. Theodoret of Cyprus) who believed in the 2 natures as radically distinct from one another while rejecting Nestorius’ talk of 2 Persons after the union

b. Moderate Monophysites: (ie. Severus of Antioch—not all Monophysites lived in or around Alexandria) tried to reinterpret Chalcedon so that the incarnation could be regarded as “one nature after the union,” or “one composite nature” of divinity and humanity through the hypostatic union.
• During the early part of the 6th their number grew within the Eastern Church until they threatened to become more numerous and powerful than other parties
c. Neo-Chalcedonians (ie. Leontius of Byzantium) wished to find a compromise between the moderate Antiochenes (dyophysites) and moderate Alexandrians (monophysites) while rejecting the radical wings of both parties

43
Q

Edict of Union (482)

A
  1. Basilicus: deposed emperor Zeno, and annulled the decisions of Chalcedon
    a. Before this could happen, Zeno regained the throne and deposed Basilicus
    b. Henotikon or “Edict of Union” (482): he (Zeno) determined that all should return to what was commonly held before the controversy
44
Q

Schism of Acacius of 519

A

a. Pope Felix II declared that Zeno had no authority to make religious claims of this sort (i.e. the edict of union)
b. This resulted in an open breach between bishops Rome and Constantinople which lasted until 519
c. Emperor Justin and pope Hormidas reached an agreement for peace, which was a return to Chalcedonian Christianity

45
Q

Justinian

A

The ablest emperor of the Byzantine Empire, and nephew of Justin
a. Restored military glory by re-conquering much of North Africa and Italy
b. He rebuilt the Hagia Sophia
c. His views on Chalcedonians and Monophysites (trying to bring peace between them, like Constantine):
• He was convinced that the differences were mostly verbal
• He believed that the two sides could come together through dialogue
• He did not realize that the differences went beyond theological. They were also: cultural, social, economic, and political
• As a result, Justinian restored some Monophysite Bishops who had been deposed during the reign of Justin

46
Q

Leontius of Byzantium (c. 485-c.543)

A

He was the one of the most distinguished Chalcedonian theologian of the time

a. He was an ardent supporter of Chalcedon
b. Emperor Justinian had appointed him to call and preside over orthodox theologians to carve out a new concept of the hypostatic union (the union of divine and humanity in one substance) fully consistent with Chalcedon

47
Q

Controversy of the Three Chapters

A

After the Conference, emperor Justin then decided to publicly condemned three theologians whose writings against the Monophysites were so strong, that Justinian decided to condemn these three theologians in order to gain the allegiance of some subjects who still rejected Chalcedon:

a. This was called the Controversy of the Three Chapters
b. The three: Theodore of Mopsuestia; Theodoret of Cyrus; and Ibas of Edessa
c. The plan backfired and the reaction was so strong, that Justin was forced to call another council

48
Q

II Council of Constantinople in 553

A

This condemnation, then, led to the II Council of Constantinople in 553 (5th Ecumenical Council): which condemned the Three Chapters
a. In order to alleviate both sides, the council condemned only the most strongly worded passages (of the works of the three) that offended the Monophysites
b. However this did not satisfy the hard-liner Monophysites, and the supporters of Chalcedon were offended that the three were censured in the first place
c. The results of the council:
• Justinian and the council condemned Antioch’s hero, Theodore of Mopsuestia (who was already dead)
• Condemned Origen
• According to Justo Gonzalez: “In short, Antiochene Christology was condemned in all its forms, while Alexandrine Christology was rejected only in its extreme forms.
• Leontius of Byzantium’s definition was explained to all and all bishops were required to affirm the Chalcedonian Definition

49
Q

Sergius of Constantinople

A

Patriarch Sergius of Constantinople proposed that while there are indeed two natures in Christ, there is only one will

50
Q

Monothelitism

A
  1. Patriarch Sergius of Constantinople proposed that while there are indeed two natures in Christ, there is only one will
    a. He seems to have been saying that Christ’s divine will took the place of the human will
    b. This was similar to Apollinarius: “a man without a will is not fully human”
    c. Sergius’ position came to be known as Monothelitism: from the Greek monos “one” and thelema “will”
51
Q

Maximus of Chrysopolis “the Confessor” (c.580-662)

A

The Main opponent of Monothelitism: Maximus of Chrysopolis “the Confessor” (c.580-662)
a. Born of a family of high reputation in Constantinople
• Served as secretary of state to Emperor Herachus
• After a while, left the service to become a monk and later moved to Carthage

b. Believed that the compromise of monothelitism would destroy orthodox Christology, and amount to a return to monophysitism—which was a denial of Christ’s 2 natures

c. He was captured along with Pope Martin by Byzantine soldiers and taken to Constantinople for trial
• Martin had disobeyed a direct order by the emperor to stop initiating Christological discussions—but he could not ignore the growing danger of Monothelitism
• He was tried for treason and crimes against the State by challenging the emperor’s authority
• Martin was tortured to death
• Maximus had his tongue cut out and one of his hands cut off.

52
Q

Third Council of Constantinople 680-681 (6th Ecumenical)

A
  1. Condemned Monothelitism

2. Condemned Sergius and Pope Honorius

53
Q

7th Ecumenical Council of Nicea in 787

A

The veneration of icons and images is permitted. Iconoclasts are condemned. It distinguished between worship in the strict sense (latria) which is due only to God vs. a lesser worship—veneration—which is given to images (dulia)

54
Q

Iconoclasts

A

Iconoclasts (destroyers of images)

55
Q

Iconodules

A

Iconodules (worshipers of images)

56
Q

Influence of Islam on iconoclasm

A

The Islamic prohibition on any images of Mohammed influenced the position of the iconoclasts.

57
Q

John of Damascus

A

John of Damascus was a high (Christian) official under an Islamic Caliph, before he resigned to become a monk and then a priest
a. He wrote: The Exposition of the Orthodox Faith
b. A systematization of the Eastern Orthodox faith
• The First Christian writing written within the context of Islam and a response to it

58
Q

The Coptic Church

A

a. A Stronghold of Monophytism
b. The Copts felt that they were marginalized by Constantinople, and those who held to the Definition of Chalcedon, were considered Melchites (“imperial” Christians”)
c. After the Arab invasions, they were the strongest church in Egypt

59
Q

Jacob Bardeaeus

A

a. The leader of the Church in Syria

b. The churches were evenly split between Chalcedonia and Monophysite

60
Q

Armenian Church

A

a. The Armenian church was the rallying point for nationalism, especially after the Persians tried to impose their religion on them (450)
b. Gregory the Illuminator: the founder
c. The invasion of Armenia
• The successors to Theodosius II (Pulcheria and Marcian) let the Persians invade Armenia
• The Country was overrun by Persians
• This was the time that Pulcheria and Marcian called the Council of Chalcedon, so the Armenians rejected it, and were immediately dubbed “Monophysites”
• The Armenians declared all who agreed with Chalcedon as traitors
• Armenia was the overrun by Arabs, than later Turkish Muslims