Lecture 5b: Abiotic stress: salt stress Flashcards

1
Q

defining salinisation and salinity

A

SALINISATION: ”accumulation of soluble salts of sodium, magnesium, potassium and calcium in the upper part of the soil profile to the extent that soil fertility is severely reduced”

SALINITY ”the degree to which water contains dissolved salts”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Global distribution of saline soils

A

According to FAO map in notes
^high salinity issues in key crop growing areas

^ https://www.fao.org/global-soil-partnership/gsasmap/en

https://www.encyclopedie-environnement.org/en/zoom/land-salinization/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Causes of salination

A

*Primary or natural salinity (weathering rocks, deposition of salts by oceans)

*Secondary or human induced salinity (i.e. Irrigation, land clearing of perennial vegetation)

Irrigation a rough calculation
*good quality irrigation water 200–500 mg/kg of soluble salt.
*water with 500 mg/kg contains 0.5 tons of salt per 1,000 m3.
*Use 6,000–10,000 m3 of water per hectare per year,
*1 ha of land will receive ~3–5 tons of salt.

https://www.fao.org/global-soil-partnership/areas-of-work/soil-salinity/en/

Crops remove negligible amount of salt this will accumulate in the root zone and must be leached by supplying more water than is required by the crops. If drainage is not adequate, the excess water causes the water table to rise, mobilizing salts which accumulate in the root zone. When the crop is unable to use all the applied water, water logging occurs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Salinity stress tolerance – Salinity is a very complex multi-factor stress:
osmotic, toxic and unbalanced uptake effects

A

Immediate problem, dehydration due to osmotic stress caused by high salinity -> initiate osmotic adjustment to maintain cell volume and turgor under salt stress

OSMOTIC STRESS:
*Reduced water uptake, inhibition of cell elongation and expansion and leaf bud
development
*Compatible solute accumulation

TOXICITY STRESS
*Inhibition of enzyme activity, protein synthesis, photosynthesis and leaf
senescence and necrosis
* lon homeostasis through ion accumulation or ion exclusion

UNBALANCED ION UPTAKE
*Nutritional deficiencies, reduced availability of other cations like K, Ca and Mg
*lon reabsortion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Salinity stress in plants: signalling cascade leading to a stress response

A

*Osmotic change and Na+ import trigger a rise of cytosolic secondary messengers

*Second messengers are sensed by specific sensors or receptors

*multiple signaling pathways are activated to either maintain

*ionic balance

*osmotic homeostasis

*regulate osmotic stress response

see image in notes from: Banik and Dutta: The Journal of Membrane Biology (2023) 256:109–124, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-023-00279-9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Salinity stress signaling overview:

A

diagram illustrates the complexity of the process: From Front. Plant Sci., 06 January 2023 Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress Volume 13 - 2022 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1053699

Figure shows: Salt stress sensing and signaling in plant cells. Osmotic alternation and Na+ import trigger a rise of cytosolic secondary messengers, which are sensed by specific sensors or receptors, therefore multiple signaling pathways involved in a variety of components are activated to maintain ionic balance and osmotic homeostasis or to regulate osmotic stress response. The arrows and bars indicate positive and negative regulation, whereas solid lines and dashed lines indicate direct regulation and indirect regulation, respectively.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ROS homeostasis and redox regulation

A

Increased accumulation of ROS induced by salt stress is toxic to plants and causes oxidative damage to cellular components -> cell death

Heavily linked to hydrogen peroxide production under stress leading to death

see paper by ^ Challabathula et al (2022) J. Plant Physiol. 268, 153583. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153583

Natural differences between salt tolerant and sensitive rice varieties linked to the production and enzymatic degradation of reactive oxygen species. enzymes linked to detoxifying H2O2 show higher expression levels in the tolerant variety, leading to less H2O2 accumulation and reduced cell death responses.

Tolerant variety appears to be able to detoxify

Ca2+ may activate Respiratory burst oxidases at plasma membrane, or linked to chloroplast similar to drought stress (inhibition of photosynthesis – excess energy leads to transfer of electrons to oxygen)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Phytohormone signalling and plant salt tolerance

A

Salt stress promotes abscisic acid (ABA) accumulation

*ABA receptors repress PP2C activity initiating ABA signalling (as seen in drought)

*ABI2 (PP2C) binds to SOS2 and inhibits its kinase activity, negatively regulating salt tolerance.

Salt stress upregulates brassinosteroid (BR) biosynthesis.

*The receptor BRI1 senses BR and acts with its coreceptor BAK to initiate signalling via BSK1 (kinase) to activate BSU1 (suppressor).

*BSU1 inhibits BIN2 and promotes the transcription factors BZR1/BES1 to induce the expression of BR-responsive genes, which enhances salt tolerance.

see salt response diagram from ^ From: Int J Mol Sci. 2021 22(9): 4609. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094609 (figure 3)

Figure description: ABA and BR signaling during salt stress. Salt stress promotes abscisic acid (ABA) accumulation. The sucrose nonfermenting-1-related protein kinase2s (SnRK2s) and the clade A type 2C protein phosphatases (PP2Cs) play key roles in mediating the crosstalk between ABA and salt stress signaling. The ABA receptors, PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE/PYR-LIKE (PYR/PYLs) sense ABA and repress PP2Cs, thereby activating the downstream kinase SnRK2. SnRK2s phosphorylate the transcription factors ABSCISIC ACID RESPONSIVE ELEMENT-BINDING FACTORs (ABFs) and ABIs to regulate the expression of stress-responsive genes. The target of rapamycin (TOR) phosphorylates PYL and represses ABA signaling and stress responses. ABI2, a member of the PP2Cs, binds to SOS2 to inhibit its kinase activity, thereby negatively regulating salt tolerance. Additionally, under salt stress, SnRKs phosphorylate SOS2 to activate osmoregulation. Salt stress also upregulates BR biosynthesis. The membrane receptor brassinosteroid insensitive 1 (BRI1) senses BR molecules and acts with its coreceptor BRI1-associated receptor kinase 1 (BAK1) to initiate the downstream phosphorylation cascade. BRI1 and BAK1 transduce the BR signal to BR signaling kinase 1 (BSK1) and activate BRI1 suppressor 1 (BSU1). BSU1 inhibits BIN2 and promotes the transcription factors BZR1/BES1 to induce the expression of BR-responsive genes, which enhances salt tolerance. Under salt stress, BIN2 phosphorylates and inhibits SOS2. This phosphoregulation by BIN2 prevents SOS2 overactivation. Arrows and bars indicate positive and negative regulation, respectively. Solid lines and dashed lines indicate direct regulation and indirect regulation, respectively.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Stress signalling pathways lead to the accumulation of functional metabolites

A

see stress resistance diagram in notes
^ metabolites that provide tolerance
^ Adapted from Takahashi et al 2020 Frontiers in Plant Science, 11:556972 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.556972

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Salinity stress tolerance mechanisms

A

see diagram from
From Stuart J Roy , Sónia Negrão , Mark Tester. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, Volume 26, 2014, 115 – 124 (Salt resistant crop plants http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.12.004 )

Figure 1 from this article is shown: The three main mechanisms of salinity tolerance in a crop plant. These mechanisms can be classified into three main categories:

(1)osmotic tolerance, which is regulated by long distance signals that reduce shoot growth and is triggered before shoot Na+ accumulation (long distance signals still require further study for understanding)

(2)ion exclusion, where Na+ and Cl− transport processes in roots reduce the accumulation of toxic concentrations of Na+ and Cl− within leaves; (examples are HKT1 and SOS1-3) . Mechanisms may include retrieval of Na+ from the xylem, compartmentation of ions in vacuoles of cortical cells and/or efflux of ions back to the soil.

(3) tissue tolerance, where high salt concentrations are found in leaves but are compartmentalized at the cellular and intracellular level (especially in the vacuole) (Examples are NHX1 and AVP1)

When plants are exposed to salt stress, in addition to the rapid osmotic effect, the ion-specific response occurs in two phases. First, Na+ exclusion by root cells is initiated and, second, tissue protection against excessive Na+ in leaf tissues occurs. Sodium exclusion by root cells is the primary protecting response in plants that delays the toxic effects of high cytoplasmic Na+. The comparison of unidirectional Na+ uptake fluxes and the rates of net accumulation of Na+ in roots indicate that the vast majority of the Na+ taken up into the root symplast is extruded back to the apoplast and soil solution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Salinity stress tolerance mechanisms: 1. Osmotic tolerance

A

*Is regulated by long distance signals that aim to reduce shoot growth and is triggered before shoot Na+ accumulation
*ROS waves
*Ca2+ waves
*Long distance electrical signalling

see Image from Takahashi et al 2020 Frontiers in Plant Science, 11:556972 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.556972

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Salinity stress tolerance mechanisms: 2. Ion exclusion - ionic balance regulation

A

Toxic sodium ions (Na+ ) enter and accumulate in plant cells during salt stress -> disrupts ion homeostasis, especially Na+ /K+ balance

SOS pathway consists of 3 genes who together maintain the Na+ homeostasis by transporting excess Na+ from the cytosol to the apoplast: SOS (Salt overly sensitive) 1,2 & 3

see Wu, S.J., Ding, L. and Zhu, J.K. (1996) Plant Cell, 8, 617-627

The sos mutants are salt-overly-sensitive mutants. The mutants are more sensitive than normal to salt, and therefore the genes affected must encode proteins for dealing with excessive salt in some way.

The SOS pathway plays a pivotal role in regulating ionic homeostasis through modulating the activity of Na+/H+ antiporters under salt stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The SOS signalling cascade

A

*SOS1 – sodium/hydrogen antiporter
*SOS2 – protein kinase
*SOS3 – SCaBP8 (Ca2+ binding protein)

see diagram from From Yang and Guo 2018 New Phytologist 217, 523-53 https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14920

SOS pathway is “off” via the action of 14-3-3 proteins and GIGANTEA (GI) which interact with SOS2 and repress its kinase activity

High salinity initiates a calcium signal that activates the SOS pathway

14-3-3 proteins are released from SOS2 and are degraded through proteasomal pathways

The SOS3/SCaBP8 protein perceives the increased [Ca2+]cyt, recruits SOS2 to the PM, and activates its activity

the activated SOS2 phosphorylates SOS1, thus enhancing the transport activity of SOS1 and transporting Na+ from cytosol to apoplast

14-3-3 and GIGANTEA (GI) proteins negatively regulate the salt overly sensitive (SOS) pathway by interacting with and repressing SOS2 kinase activity, and the activity of plasma membrane (PM) H+-ATPase isinhibitedbySOS3-likecalcium-bindingprotein1(SCaBP1)/calcine urin B-like protein2(CBL2)(calcium-binding protein)andSOS2-likeprotein5(PKS5)/SOS2-like protein24 (PKS24) (serine/threonine protein kinases). Arabidopsis K+transporter1 (AKT1) activity is repressed by SCaBP8. Under salt stress, the SOS pathway is activated by a calcium signal, and SCaBP8 is phosphorylated by SOS2, which might disassociate from AKT1, a potassium channel. SOS1 sodium transport requires a proton gradient created by PM H+-ATPases whose activity is activated by DnaJ homolog3( J3;heatshockprotein40-like) through inhibition of PKS5 kinase activity. Vacuolar partitioning of Na+ is mediated by the vacuolar Na+/H+ exchanger (NHX) (a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter) driven by the proton gradient created by vacuolar H+-ATPases and H+-pyrophosphatases. The activity of the vacuolar H+-ATPaseandNa+/H+exchangercanbeactivatedbySOS2.Ó2017 The Authors New PhytologistÓ2017 New Phytologist TrustNew Phytologist(2018)217:523–539www.newphytologist.comNewPhytologistTansley reviewReview525

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Key to salt stress signalling is an increase in cytosolic calcium concentration
(Salinity stress tolerance mechanism 2)

A

NaCl induces increase in cytoplasmic Ca2+
^ Knight, H., et al. Plant J 12, 1067–1078 (1997).

Mutant unable to induce [Ca^2++] cytoplasmic signaling in response to monocations (K+, Li+)

Mutant screen:
*Screened around 86,000 seeds carrying random T-DNA insertions
*Recovered ~10,000 seedlings with reduced [Ca^2+]i burst in response to 200 mM NaCl

another study by Jiang, Z. et al. Plant cell-surface GIPC sphingolipids sense salt to trigger Ca2+ influx. Nature 572, 341–346 (2019).
^ Found Wild type produces luminescence due to Ca2+ accumulation
No Ca2+ accumulated in the moca1 mutant and Na accumulates leading to salt stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

(Salinity stress tolerance mechanism 2)
MOCA1 encodes a glucuronosyltransferase for GIPCs (Glycosyl inositol phosphorylceramide)

A

see Jiang, Z. et al. Plant cell-surface GIPC sphingolipids sense salt to trigger Ca2+ influx. Nature 572, 341–346 (2019)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

(Salinity stress tolerance mechanism 2)
Overexpressing SOS2 enhances salt tolerance in transgenic poplar

A

SOS1 needs to be activated by SOS2 and SOS3 to be at its most effective so the effect of OE SOS1 alone is not huge. There are some conflicting reports from studies in Arabidopsis as to which one is most effective on its own, but reports seem to agree that there is little advantage in combining more than one SOS gene. A number of studies have chosen to OE SOS2.

More SOS2 should mean it is more responsive to salt.

See Yang et al 2015 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25641517

LEFT: Overexpression of PtSOS2TD (a constitutively active form) enhances salt tolerance in transgenic poplar plants. (a–c) Effects of salinity on the growth of wild‐type (WT) and three independent transgenic lines LS4, LS7 and LS8. Six‐week‐old plants were treated with 0, 100 or 150 mm NaCl for another 21 days, and then, representative plants were chosen and photographed. Scale bars = 10 cm

RIGHT: Net Na+ flux test. Effect of salinity (100 mM NaCl) on net Na+ efflux in the roots of transgenic lines (LS7, LS8) and wild-type (WT) plants were measured. (d) Mean net Na+ efflux. Throughout, error bars represent SD from three independent experiments. Values labelled with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Because SOS2TD is constitutively active it doesn’t need SOS3 to help it activate the SOS1 channel

17
Q

(Salinity stress tolerance mechanism 2)
Factors that affect the impact of salinity on agricultural production

A

see flow diagram in notes
from: https://ehaloph.uc.pt

Halophytes are salt adapted plants and make up 1% of all extant species of plant none of which are currently used as crops

18
Q

(Salinity stress tolerance mechanism 2)

SOS2 from the halophyte Nitraria tangutorum

A

Utilise enzymes (SOS2 in this case) from halophytes to engineer salt tolerance
^Overexpression of NtSOS2 From Halophyte Plant N. tangutorum Enhances Tolerance to Salt Stress in Arabidopsis ( a glycophyte sensitive to salt)

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.716855/full

FIGURE 1. Multiple amino acid sequence alignment of NtSOS2. The amino acid from Arachis hypogaea (HG797656.1), Arabidopsis thaliana (NM_122932.5), Gossypium hirsutum (GU_188961.1), Populus alba (KT_8753

overexpression vector of NtSOS2 was constructed and transformed into Arabidopsis, three of transgenic lines with relatively high expression of NtSOS2 were selected through semi-quantitative experiments31.1), Sorghum bicolor (KY_202762.1), Solanum lycopersicum (NM_001247281.2), Oryza sativa (XP_015643084.1), the blue lines represent the Protein Kinase and NAF/FLSL domain, respectively.

NtSOS2 Affects the Expression of Ion Transporter-Related Genes in Arabidopsis, so is able to regulate the endogenous Arabidopsis genes

NtSOS2 gene functionally complements an Arabidopsis sos-2 mutant -

19
Q

(Salinity stress tolerance mechanism 2)

The classical SOS pathway confers natural variation of salt tolerance in maize

Classic mendelian genetics – a single recessive gene reduces tolerance:

A

*Single recessive gene underlies the salt hypersensitive phenotype in line LH65.

*Single gene turned out to be the Na+/H+ antipoter gene ZmSOS1

*Sensitivity due to 4-bp deletion - frame-shifting and truncation of ZmSOS1 line LH65

Figure from: https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi

A single recessive gene underlies the salt hypersensitive phenotype of maize inbred line LH65. (a) The appearance of 2-wk-old Zheng58 (a salt-tolerant maize inbred line) and LH65 (a salt hypersensitive maize inbred line) grown under control and salt (100 mM NaCl) conditions. (b–e) The biomass (b), salt-induced biomass reduction (c), shoot Na+ (d), and K+ (e) content of the plants with the indicated genotypes and treatments. (f, g) The appearance (f) and biomass (g) of 2-wk-old F2 individuals grown under salt condition. Bars: (a, f) 10 cm. The results in (b–e) are means ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. The statistical significances were determined by a two-sided t-test./full/10.1111/nph.18278

20
Q

(Salinity stress tolerance mechanism 2)

Other transporters: HIGH-AFFINITY K+ TRANSPORTER 1 and 2

A

Retrieves/diverts Na+ from the xylem stream or phloem to confine toxic ions to the roots and protect the shoots (sodium exclusion from shoots)
HKT1 transports Na+ and HKT2 transports K+

21
Q

(Salinity stress tolerance mechanism 2)

Natural variation of salt tolerance (as observed in the different rice varieties)

– the power of introgression lines

A

Introgression of an ancestral wheat HKT1 allele into durum wheat

NAX2 locus encodes a plasma membrane HKT Na+ transporter

TmHKT1;5 is an allele from ancestral wheat that has been lost in modern varieties

^Munns et al, Nat. Biotech. 2012 http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v30/n4/full/nbt.2120.html

TmHKT15 is located on the plasma membrane of root cells surrounding xylem vessels, withdraws Na+ from the xylem to reduce transport of Na+ to leaves

For this gene, introgressing an ancient wheat variety’s HKT1 allele into modern wheat varieties has been more successful than efforts to do something similar using transgenic plants.

See: Munns et al 2012 in Nature Biotech.

From the abstract of this paper:

The ability of wheat to maintain a low sodium concentration ([Na+]) in leaves correlates with improved growth under saline conditions. This trait, termed Na+ exclusion, contributes to the greater salt tolerance of bread wheat relative to durum wheat. To improve the salt tolerance of durum wheat, we explored natural diversity in shoot Na+ exclusion within ancestral wheat germplasm. Previously, we showed that crossing of Nax2, a gene locus in the wheat relative Triticum monococcum into a commercial durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum var. Tamaroi) reduced its leaf [Na+] . Here we show that a gene in the Nax2 locus, TmHKT1;5-A, encodes a Na+-selective transporter located on the plasma membrane of root cells surrounding xylem vessels, which is therefore ideally localized to withdraw Na+ from the xylem and reduce transport of Na+ to leaves. Field trials on saline soils demonstrate that the presence of TmHKT1;5-A significantly reduces leaf [Na+] and increases durum wheat grain yield by 25% compared to near-isogenic lines without the Nax2 locus.

In this figure, Mean [NaCl] in soil (mM) at the different field and plots Field 1: 6 (range 1–11) Field 2 plot 1: 42 (23–63); plot 2: 75 (35–98); plot 3 was high salinity: 169 (114–310) is shown. The graph shows the relative yield of a commercial wheat variety compared with a new variety created in this study, which has the anscestral wheat HKT1 gene incorporated. In the field sites that had lower levels of salinity there is no difference in performance but in the high salt field site the new variety does appreciably better.

22
Q

(Salinity stress tolerance mechanism 2)

A molecular modelling approach to finding good HKT1;5 alleles for salt tolerance in rice

A

see notes for chart
^ top: Aspartate to histidine substitution in sensitive genotypes – position 332

bottom:Valine to leucine substitution in sensitive genotypes position 395

From Shohan et al 2019 in Fontiers in Plant Science. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.01420/full

Preferential expression of HKT1;5 in roots compared to shoots

Figure 5 Multiple sequence alignment partial result of salt sensitive and salt tolerant rice varieties (Table 1). Amino acid sequence alignment results for (A) 140 to 184, (B) 310 to 360, and (C) 370 to 410 is provided. Changes in the position 140, 184, 332, and 39 has been marked with a black box. (A) In 140 position substitution is seen between aspartic acid, proline, isoleucine, and threonine and in 184 position arginine to histidine. (B) In 332 position aspartic acid to histidine substitution and (C) in 395 position valine to leucine substitution was observed. The latter two substitutions are present only in the sensitive genotypes.

Valine is unable to generate strong hydrophobic network with its surroundings in comparison to leucine due to reduced side chain length.

23
Q

(Salinity stress tolerance mechanism 2)

Better HKT1;5 alleles predicted to effect greater levels of Na+ transport

A

see diagram in notes
The substitutions make the pore more rigid

From Shohan et al 2019 in Fontiers in Plant Science. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.01420/full

Figure 13 Location of OsHKT1;5 (circled) and two amino acid substitutions working together to give tolerance against salt stress. High salt concentration in soil allows Na+ to enter through root and transport throughout the plant via the xylem vessel and is recirculated back to the root through phloem (Maathuis, 2013). OsHKT1;5 functions by transporting Na+ out of xylem vessel into xylem parenchyma (efflux) minimizing the harmful effects to the plant due to Na+ accumulation. Presence of valine instead of leucine in position 395 and of aspartate in place of histidine (at position 332) allows for greater transfer rate of Na+ out of xylem vessel into the root xylem parenchyma (1, 2).

Inset- Figure 8 from same paper. They can predict where the key amino acids sit in the 3D structure of the protein and what their effect will be on the protein’s activity

24
Q

(Salinity stress tolerance mechanism 2)

The future for ancestral alleles

A

*Structural modelling in wheat also identified underlying differences in Na+ transport TmHKT1;5 (triticum monococcum) is a more effective allele: better Na+ transporting properties

*OsHKT1 important for Na+ exclusion in rice

*Potential for genome editing in elite crop varieties to engineer effective alleles.

^Xu et al 2018, Cell Mol Sci75(6):1133-1144 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29177534/

25
Stress-tolerance traits have to be in the breeding population
Breeding has limited genetic diversity and the gene pool breeders have available in elite varieties. What happens if the traits/genes for a trait are not present in a population? Stress tolerant genes missing from modern cultivars are often present in wild population Lopes, M.S., Araus, J.L., van Heerden, P.D.R., and Foyer, C.H. (2011). Enhancing drought tolerance in C4 crops. J. Exp. Bot. 62: 3135 – 3153 by permission of Society of Experimental Biology
26
Salinity stress tolerance mechanism: 3. Tissue tolerance - ion sequestration mechanisms
Salt storage in the vacuole: *NHX1 is a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter that moves sodium to the vacuole *Against a gradient - so needs energy *Coupled to pumps like AVP1 (vacuole proton pyrophosphatase) that built up a proton gradient Note: The SOS3/SCaBP8-SOS2 module may also positively regulate the activities of NHX The overall scheme in this slide is taken from a Nature Genetics review (http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v9/n6/full/nrg2342.html) Genetic approaches to crop improvement: responding to environmental and population changes Proton pumps like AVP1 generate protons to fuel the NHX1 antiporter. (The protons can also be generated by a vacuolar ATPase). So you can either express more antiporter or you can increase the proton drive. Both have been done. See following slides. Cellular responses to Na+ toxicity. It is thought that Na+ is passively transported into the cytosol by non-selective cation channels (NSCCs). To decrease cytosolic Na+ concentration, two mechanisms operate. One is to exclude Na+ across the plasma membrane. SOS1, a Na+–H+ exchanger located at the plasma membrane, is the only transporter identified in plants that carries out this function. Another mechanism is to compartmentalize Na+ into vacuoles, where Na+ is less toxic. This is performed by the vacuolar Na+&–H+ antiporter, NHX1. Both transporter activities require an H+ gradient across the membranes, which is generated either by a plasma membrane H+-ATPase or by a vacuolar H+-ATPase (yellow ovals), and by vacuolar H+-pyrophosphatase (AVP1). Accumulation of osmoprotectants (for example, betaine, proline and sugar alcohols) and heat shock proteins (HSPs) are also induced by salt stress. Overexpression of SOS1, NHX1, and AVP1, as well as HSPs or proteins for the biosynthesis of osmoprotectants, has been reported to enhance salt tolerance in several plant species.
27
Salt Tolerance Conferred by Overexpression of the Vacuolar Na+/H+ Antiporter (NHX) in Arabidopsis
AtNHX1 is the first studied plant vacuolar protein that can mediate Na+ transport into vacuoles (Apse MP, Aharon GS, Snedden WA, Blumwald E (1999) Science 285: 1256-1258) Fig. 3. Salt treatment of wild-type plants and plants overexpressing AtNHX1. Transgenic T3 plants from the lines overexpressing AtNHX1 were used in assessing salt tolerance. Twenty wild-type plants and 20 of each of the three lines of transformed plants overexpressing AtNHX1 were grown on a short-day cycle (8 hours light, 16 hours dark). Each set of 20 plants was divided into five groups (labeled A through E) of four plants each. We applied 25 ml of a diluted nutrient solution (1/8 MS salts) every other day over the 16-day watering treatment. The control group received no NaCl supplementation. The remaining groups were watered with nutrient solution supplemented with NaCl. The concentrations of NaCl supplementation were increased stepwise by 50 mM every 4 days for each group, to the indicated maximum: (A) control, (B) 50 mM NaCl, (C) 100 mM NaCl, (D) 150 mM NaCl, and (E) 200 mM NaCl. The salt-tolerance phenotype was observed in three independent transgenic lines tested. The transgenic line shown (2') is representative of the three tested lines as are the plants from each treatment group. (A) (upper panel) Wild-type plants. (B) (lower panel) Plants overexpressing AtNHX1. (Inset) Northern blot of RNA isolated from leaves of wild-type (wt) and three independent lines (2'; 3'; 4') of transgenic plants grown in the absence of NaCl. RNA was probed with AtNHX1 cDNA. Equal amounts of total RNA were present in each sample (30 µg). In all plants, the endogenous 2.1 kilobase (kb) transcript was detected. An additional transcript of ~1.7 kb that corresponds to the predicted open reading frame of AtNHX1 can be seen only in the transgenic plants. Apparent molecular size (kb) of the transcripts is indicated to the left.
28
AVP1 OE increases salt and drought tolerance
*Elevated vacuolar solute content -> greater water retention drought tolerance *At high Na+ concentrations, enhances the Na+ sequestration into the vacuole – salt survival sodium sequestration in vacuole also improves water retention Data from two separate papers. The first shows it works in Arabidopsis. The second shows tomato. As well as conferring salt tolerance as might be expected, the increased proton gradient across the vacuolar membrane appears to improve solute uptake (this is hypothesised in the paper but a clear argument is not given as to why) and the authors think this is why water is better retained in AVP1 overexpressers (next slide) and the plants are more drought tolerant. The plants also have improved root growth (a likely indirect consequence of the H translocating activity affecting auxin movement) and this helps too. Figure on the left is from : Gaxiola R A et al. PNAS 2001;98:11444-11449 (http://www.pnas.org/content/98/20/11444.short) Wild-type and AVP1 transgenic plants deprived of water. Eight wild-type plants and eight of each of the two AVP1-overexpressing transgenic lines (AVP1-1 and AVP1-2) were grown on soil in a 16-h light/8-h dark cycle at 21°C. Plants were watered with a diluted nutrient solution (1/8 MS Murashige & Skoog salt mixture) every 4 days for 4 weeks. At week 5, the plants were watered and then transferred to a 24°C growth chamber with no further addition of water. The photograph corresponds to plants at day 10 of water-deficit stress (A) and the same plants 24 h after rewatering (B). WT, wild type. Figure on the right is from a paper 4 years later in which the AVP1 from Arabidopsis was expressed in tomato. These XAVP1-D plants (see below and next slide) are not just over-expressers but they have a gain of function mutation that increases the effectiveness of the AVP1 protein. (It’s a mutation at its active site). From: Park et al., PNAS 2005 vol 102, https://www.pnas.org/content/102/52/18830 (From the paper: “Of note, the AVP1D gene is the E229D gain-of-function mutant of the AVP1 gene that has a coordinated increase of both PPi hydrolytic activity and PPi-dependent H+-translocation”) Figure legend: Control and transgenic tomato plants respond differently to an imposed soil water deficit. Ten-week-old, well watered plants were subjected to imposed water stress by withholding irrigation. In each panel, images of six control plants are shown on the left and three plants each of lines XAVP1D-1 (white arrows) and XAVP1D-2 (green arrows) are shown on the right. (A) Photographs were taken after 13 days of stress. Pots were irrigated to field capacity on day 13, and photographs were taken 1 day (B) and 4 days (C) after rewatering.
29
AVP1 OE tomato plants are more resistant to drought
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1323196/ From the same tomato paper as on previous slide. Transgenic plants maintain greater leaf water potentials and take up greater amounts of water during imposed soil water deficits. Sets of control and transgenic plants were subjected to water deficit stress as described in the legend of Fig. 3. In all cases, pots were irrigated to field capacity on day one. (A) Leaf water potentials of four control plants and a total of eight transgenic plants (representing lines XAVP1D-1, XAVP1D-2, and XAVP1D-5 from Fig. 1) were monitored during the imposed stress. Results are shown as means ± SE of leaf water potential measured in control and (pooled) transgenic plants. (B) Photograph of representative control and XAVP1D plants taken on day 5 of the imposed stress. (C) Water uptake of control and transgenic plants during an imposed period of soil water deficit. The experiment shown in A was repeated with a second set of control and transgenic plants (representing lines XAVP1D-1 and XAVP1D-2); in this case, four transgenic and four control plants were tested. Water uptake measurements are shown for periods of the stress during which transgenic plants displayed significantly greater leaf water potentials (i.e., on days 5, 6, and 8, as was the case during the stress regime shown in A). The leaf water potentials with corresponding standard error values (in MPa) of control and transgenic plants measured on the day that water uptake was measured (i.e., on day 5, day 6, and day 8) are shown above the bars representing water uptake values.
30
Barley yield in salinity increased by AtAVP1 expression
extreme salt environment AVP1 variant has high tol. Article in Plant Biotechnology journal 2014 by Schilling et al. Expression of the Arabidopsis vacuolar H+-pyrophosphatase gene (AVP1) improves the shoot biomass of transgenic barley and increases grain yield in a saline field http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pbi.12145/full Legend for this figure: Shoot biomass of wild-type and transgenic barley expressing AVP1 in a saline field trial (a) Shoot biomass (g DW/plant) of wild-type (cv. Golden Promise) and four transgenic barley lines expressing AVP1 (35S-AVP1-1a, 35S-AVP1-1b, 35S-AVP1-2 & 35S-AVP1-3) after 12 weeks growth in the low- (white bars) and high-salinity (grey bars) field. (b) Image of shoot growth of a representative wild-type (cv. Golden Promise) and transgenic barley expressing AVP1 (35S-AVP1-1b) at high salinity. Values are the mean ± s.e.m (n = 12) with asterisks (*) indicating a significant difference (one-way ANOVA, LSD, P < 0.05).
31
Things don’t always work as planned : a lot of trial and error is involved
Nguyen, N.T., Vu, H.T., Nguyen, T.T., Nguyen, L.-A.T., Nguyen, M.-C.D., Hoang, K.L., Nguyen, K.T. and Quach, T.N. (2019) ‘Co-expression of Arabidopsis AtAVP1 and AtNHX1 to improve salt tolerance in soybean’, Crop Science, [online] Available at: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2018.10.0640 Nguyen et al Crop science, Vol. 59, 2019; 1133 The build up of stored sodium resulted in toxicity in adult plants – suggesting sequestering is less effective than depositing Both transgenes were expressed using a strong constitutive promoter – CamV35S to drive expression All transgenic lines have increased Na+ and K+ accumulation in leaves and root Greater accumulation of Na+ in leaves and roots, may limit long-term tolerance to salinity -> no benefit on final yield Fig. 2. Responses of transgenic soybean expressing AtAVP1 and AtNHX1 to NaCl stress. (A) Growth of wild-type (DT26) and transgenic plants under 0 and 100 mM NaCl. Pictures were taken after 28 d under 100 mM NaCl stress. (B) Plant height, shoot dry weight (DW) and root DW of WT and transgenic plants overexpressing AtAVP1 (A) and AtNHX1 (N) and both genes (AN). Salt treatments started at V2, and measurements were taken after 35 (for the 100 mM NaCl treatment) and 14 d (for the 200 mM NaCl treatment), when the leaf scorch score of the WT reached 5.0. A common lowercase letter indicates no significant difference among means of soybean genotypes in the same stress treatment (mean ± SEM, Duncan’s test, p < 0.05). Fig. 5. Transgenic and wild-type soybean at maturity. Top: Plants growing under control (2.3 dS m−1) and salt stress (7.5 dS m−1) in greenhouse conditions in summer 2016. Bottom: Shoot dry weight (DW) and seed yield were measured at harvest. A common lowercase letter indicates no significant difference among means of soybean genotypes in the same stress treatment (mean ± SEM, Duncan’s test, p < 0.05).
32
Transporter genes have been the subject of patent applications
Gaxiola, R.A., Fink, G.R. and Alper, S.L. (2011) ‘Transgenic plants overexpressing a plant vacuolar pyrophosphatase’, US Patent 8003852 B2, issued 23 August 2011.
33
Drought and salinity key points
Drought and salinity key points *In response to both stressors, plants often exhibit stomatal closure as a protective mechanism to conserve water, limiting gas exchange. *Both drought and salt stress result in water scarcity for plants, impacting essential physiological processes. *Both drought and salt stress can cause cellular damage due to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species, impacting plant cell structures. *Both drought and salt stress trigger molecular signalling pathways involved in stress response and adaptation (ROS, phytohormones (ABA, BR and others), compatible solutes) *Both stress conditions commonly result in stunted growth, as plants redirect resources to cope with the stress *Improving tolerance to one, may also lead to the improvement of other stresses that involve osmotic stress/water deficits – more on that next week