lecture 5 -parenting styles Flashcards
diana baumrind
-famous for
-clinical psychologist famous for defining parenting styles
-work with ethics in psycholgy
-and for warmth vs control concept
dimensions of parenting
-(baumrind ,1991, gray and steinberg 1999)
-acceptance - amount of emotional warmth directed and acceptance of the child
-strictness of supervision- how much control is exerted over the child behaviour? how is control exerted? a reasonable amount given the situation?
autonomy giving -is the child given the appropriate level of autonomy
parenting style across the dimensions
-authoritative
-acceptance- involvement
:high level of acceptance
-genuinely involved in child’s life in a warm caring way
strictness of supervision
-is high
-makes appropriate and consistent demands
-fosters self control through discipline
autonomy giving
-high autonomy
-child encouraged to make own decisions
-able to discuss disagreements and resolve them through discussions
-consequences of authoritative parenting style
-in early and middle childhood
-in late childhood/ adolescence
in early and middle childhood
-well tempered, cooperative
-good self control and persistent
late childhood and adolescence
-good academic progress
high levels of maturity
-high self esteem
parenting styles across dimensions
-authoritarian
acceptance-involvement
-low acceptance
-cold and rejecting of the child
strictness of supervision
-high strictness
-coercive in nature, coercive discipline with little explanation (because I say so)
-uses behavioural and psychological control
autonomy giving
-low autonomy giving
-child’s life heavily controlled, with little input from child
consequences of authoritarian parenting style
early and middle childhood
-reported to be anxious and unhappy during these years
-low self esteem and self reliance (maybe because they weren’t given autonomy as a child)
-tend to ‘act out’ (externalise) when frustrated
late childhood and adolescence
-poor academic performance (maybe because of not having secure base)
-tend to be well behaved in late childhood
-
permissive parenting style across dimensions
acceptance-involvement
-high acceptance
-warming and accepting of the child
-too indulgent
strictness of supervision
-low strictness
-little direct control exerted of the child
autonomy giving
-high autonomy giving
-child allowed to make decisions that they are not mature enough to make
consequences of permissive parenting style
-in early childhood
-in late childhood
early to mid childhood
-lack of self control
-tends to be over dependent on adults
-low persistence
late childhood into adolescence
-defiant of authority figures (not used to being disciplined)
-increased anti social behaviour
-poor school performance
uninvolved parenting style across dimensions
-added more recently
acceptance - involvement
-low acceptance
-emotional withdrawn and distant
-verging on neglect
strictness of supervision
-low strictness
-little or no direct control of the child
autonomy giving
-high autonomy giving
-uninterested in child’s viewpoint
consequences of uninvolved parenting style
early and middle childhood
-low social skills
-poor academic performance
-attachment problems
late childhood and adolescence
-poor emotional self control
-increased anti social behaviour
-poor school performance
what is so good about authoritative parenting
-provide ____ models of social and emotional competence
-foster self esteem and responsibility through
-children comply…
-inductive discipline
-supporting parenting can buffer the effect of…..
-authoritative parents provide good models of social and emotional competence (lindsay and mize 2000)
-they foster self esteem and responsibility through granting appropriate levels of autonomy (carlson 2000)
-children comply and internalise more with reasonable and fair discipline
-so called inductive discipline (hoffman 2000) explain why certain things are bad eg crossing the road instead of just saying i said so
-disapproval is most effective from an agent that shows warmth and caring
supportive parenting can ‘buffer’ the effect of adverse environmental factors conditions (poverty ,family stress)
-petit et al 1997 found that supportive parenting moderated the effect of adversity on school adjustment
parenting style and attachment
-karavasilis et al 2003 study
findings
-investigated how the parenting children receive relates to their attachment to their mothers in middle childhood/adolescence
findings; positive associations between parenting style (warm parental involvement, behavioural monitoring, psychological autonomy granting) and secure attachment styles
negative associations between parenting styles and insecure attachment styles (less likely to have insecure attachment styles if they had a warm parenting style)
psychological control
two crucial forms
-behavioural -behaviours that try to manage or control the child’s behaviour
-don’t do that you will hurt yourself
psychological
-refers to control attempts that intrude into the psychological and emotional development of the child
psychological control examples
-constraiing verbal expressions: cutting off,changing the subject, dominating the conversation , asking leading questions
-invalidating feelings: discounting , misinterpreting the feelings of members of the family
personal attack : attack the worth of the place within the family of another family member, brought past events as evidence ‘ your naughty your sister wont want to play with you’
guilt induction
-pointing out that another behaviour had a negative emotional impact on another family member-guilt tripping
love withdrawal
-threat to withdraw love or attention if other family member did not do or become what the other expected
consequences of psychological control / and behavioural
Psychological control predicts
* Internalising problems (depression)
* Externalising Problems (antisocial behaviour) (Barber, 1996)
- Behavioural control negatively related to same issues
- Combined with high affection, psychological control leads to problem behaviour in kindergarten children (Anunola & Nurmi, 2005)
- Psychological control of adolescent predicted levels Internal distress (Gray& Steinberg, 1999)