Lecture 5 Attention Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Duncan 1984

A

Showed participants a stimuli with 2 objects, box and broken line, superimposed, which could differ in attributes :box size, gap side, line slant, dotted or dashed line.

Before showing, they were told which attributes to focus on.

People were more accurate when asked 2 attributes which were on ONE of the objects, rather than on the box AND the line.

People lost accuracy when had to form representations of 2 objects - object based attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was found when people were shown superimposed images and were negatively primed?

A

They did in fact perceive the ignored object, as they look longer to name them, than the attended object

Rock and Gutman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was found when people were shown a line and a box in the space space and asked to name attributes about them?

A

People were more accurate if the two attributes asked were in the same space - people lost accuracy if they had to represent both objects rather than one

Object based attention

Duncan 1984

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Egly, driver, Rafal

A

Used 2 long rectangles, where then stimulus could pop up on either end of the 2 objects, making 4 possible options, and 4 cue areas

Could miscue 2 diff ways - within the same object, or in the other object

When the stimulus is a presented in the UNCUED OBJECT, RT is SLOWER

Same object advantage is apparently

Object based attention effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Effects of an occlude get bar?

A

Moore, yantis and Vaughan

The including bar obstructs the image, but still find object advantage.

Attention and RT time was not related to crossing edges or boundaries. We perceive continuous objects

3D perceptual effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Neuroimaging evidence for object based attention?

A

Selective fmri activation when viewing houses and faces

Faces - fusiform face area

Houses - parahippocampal place area

When you superimpose a face and house, and ask person to only focus on one, then more activation will go to one of those areas and less for the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does visual neglect arise from?

A

Damage to right parietal lobe

Deficit in processing spatial info

Difficulty in making left side of space accessible to conscious awareness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What attention does reflective and voluntary systems provide?

A

Reflexive - new stimuli

Voluntary - sustained attentional focus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the two pathways of processing visual info?

A

Ventral pathway and dorsal pathway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does the ventral pathway of processing visual info do

A

It is in the temporal lobe

Processes form and colour - WHAT pathway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does dorsal pathway in visual info processing do

A

Parietal lobe

Direction of motion, spatial location

WHERE pathway

Spatial neglect people have this damaged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Rock and Gutman?

A

Used abstract overlapping features.

Told subjects to rate aesthetic appeal of one.

Surprise memory test, and they had no memory of the object they didn’t attend even though it was occupying the same space - object based attention

Doesn’t fit spatial theories - spotlight theory and FIT

Then, used name able objects superimposed. NEGATVELY PRIMED some objects, and found that ignored objects took longer to name by memory.

Means that the ignored object WAS perceived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the cuing deficits of right parietal damage?

A

RT got heaps longer when the invalid cue was in the right side and the stimuli was on the LEFT.

Ability to voluntarily engage attention was not impaired, but disengaging and shifting response was impaired

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What happened with neglect people who were shown two everyday objects

A

They were good when you showed them one object which was in the left

But if you placed a second object in the right visual field, then there was a large left visual field deficit.
Exctinciton occurred.

Kinda agrees with late selection that only one thing can get through filter at a time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is balint’s syndrome

A

Bilateral lesions in parietal and or occipital lobe

Can’t see more than a single fixated object.

Ocular ataxia - can’t shift fixation from one object to another
Simultanagnosia - can’t see more than one object at a time

Occurs even when things overlap

Object based :-)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is inhibition of return

A

When cued location tagged as uninteresting, so slower RT there

Interaction of top down and bottom up

This tagging is object based and not space based

17
Q

What happens when researched object based inhibition of return?

A

Tipper

Did the standard IOR, by cuing a circle, then waiting a long SOA. Then flashing target at the cue location. Longer RT when target at cue location because people looked there and realised nothing was there

Then he rotated the cicrles, and noticed that inhibition of return followed the new location. Not confined to region of space. RT longer for cued circle still.

18
Q

Object based neglect? Behrmann & Tipper

A

Joined circles with a line marking barbells

Asked if neglect of space or neglect of left side of OBJECT

Found that it was a neglect of the left side of the object - longer detection RT on left

When they rotated the barbell, longer RTs on the RIGHT. Object based AF