Lecture 5 Flashcards
Treaties, Can't contain all of the lecture
Treaties can be sources of IL
o Some treaties codify a body of customary IL, and are generally accepted as authoritative statements of customary IL, even by non-signatories.
o Treaties cannot bind non-parties, but non-parties can choose to abide by the rules it lays out.
Treaties are hard law within IL
o They can pretty much do anything, except authorize violation of a peremptory norm (article 53 of Vienna convention on law of treaties).
o Some draw a distinction between law-making treaties and contractual treaties, but all treaties are contractual.
How are treaties made?
o Treaties are written, made between states, represented by people authorized to do so.
o Treaties are distinguished from other international agreements in that they are legally binding. Substance, not form, dictates whether something is a treaty or not.
o Treaties typically have;
A preamble
Sometimes a long list of signatories’ names
Main body
Signatures/seals
o Then;
Reservations (not always possible or accepted)
Protocols
* Only binding for states signing both the treaty and the protocol
* Some can be mandatory.
Signatories and ratification
o Signature is usually not the final step. After signatories, the parties have to ratify the treaties, this allows the principal to endorse what the agent has or hasn’t done.
o Most treaties aren’t binding on states until they are ratified, but in the meantime that state isn’t meant to do anything that would defeat the purpose of the treaty.
o Ratification is done according to domestic procedures, usually either the executive or the legislature.
Monism
o In monist systems, treaties (IL) do not need to be translated into municipal law. They have a direct effect (Nl). o Some states have a mix of the 2 (USA).
Dualist systems
o In dualist systems, domestic legislation is required to translate the treaty obligations into municipal law (UK).
o Some states have a mix of the 2 (USA).
Treaties end
On its own terms (self termination (expiry), disappearance of essential conditions, etc).
By withdrawal (denunciation).
In response to a serious breach by one party (sometimes).
For a custom to become law we need 2 elements
o The first is evidence of widespread and settled state practice.
State practice is ascertained not only through the actions of national executives, but also from domestic courts and legislatures, as well as public statements.
o The second is opinion juris, meaning states adhere to the custom because they believe they have a legal duty to do so.
Opinion juris, a somewhat artificial exercise, as it implies states have a collective mind/intentionality of their own!
General principles recognized by civilized nations
- Art 38(1)(c); the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations.
o There are 2 views about this seldom-invoked source.
Either it refers to principles which are to be found in most of all municipal law systems, but which do not exist as positive IL.
Or, it also includes very basic legal principles such as pacta sunt servanda.
Other sources of law
- Resolutions of the UNGA (arguably).
- Studies produced by the International law commission even if they aren’t adopted.
- UNSC doesn’t make law, but rather creates specific obligations, backed by a treaty (UN charter).
- Is there a hierarchy of norms? Sort of, but not completely.
Article 38(1) refers to ex aequo et bono
article 38(1) refers to ex aequo et bono which means ‘according to the right and the good.’
Power for the court (and some tribunals) to decide cases based on what they feel is right without reference to any rule of positive law.
A remanent of natural law in a largely positivist system, but very seldom used.
Article 38(1)
generally considered to be authoritative
statutes of the permanent court of international justice
Article 38(1)(a)
- Art 38(1)(a): “international conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting states.”
general notes
o A note on terminology: treaties can be called all sorts of things, such as agreement, convention, exchange of notes, protocol, pact, etc ,etc.
o The rules relating to treaties are part of customary IL, but also in the Vienna convention on the law of treaties (116 parties), which is viewed as the authoritative restatement ad well as positive law of treaties.
o Strictly speaking, some argue treaties aren’t sources of law as such, as much as they are a source of obligation under the law, binding on its parties (at least).
What does this mean? (state practice + opinion juris)
o What this means is that persistent breach of an existing customary rule, in some circumstances, eventually becomes evidence of a new rule.
o States can prevent being bound by an emerging rule of customary IL by acting as a persistent objector, silence isn’t good enough.
o Customary IL is inferior to treaty for the parties of that treaty, but not for third parties.