Lecture 4 - Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Flashcards
What is a systematic review?
A structured method of reviewing research that identifies, selects, synthesizes, and appraises primary research evidence relevant to a specific question.
What is the primary aim of systematic reviews?
To synthesize evidence from multiple studies to provide reliable answers to specific research questions.
Why are systematic reviews valuable?
They combine evidence from several studies, resolve conflicts in findings, and provide a comprehensive basis for decision-making.
What are the 8 key steps of a systematic review?
- Formulate the research question.
- Develop a research protocol.
- Conduct a comprehensive literature search.
- Select studies based on criteria.
- Extract data from selected studies.
- Conduct quality assessment (critical appraisal).
- Synthesize data (quantitative or narrative).
- Disseminate results.
What makes a good research question in systematic reviews?
It should be specific, clearly stated, and often structured using the PICOS framework.
What does PICOS stand for?
Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, and Study design.
What is a research protocol in systematic reviews?
A predefined plan outlining aims, methodology, search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and data synthesis methods.
Why is registering research protocols important?
It ensures transparency, minimizes reporting bias, and avoids duplication of efforts.
What are essential tips for conducting a literature search?
Use inclusion/exclusion criteria, structured search terms (AND/OR), multiple databases, and document the strategy for replicability.
What challenges arise in literature searching?
Deciding where to start, determining when to stop, handling associated domains, and perfecting the search strategy.
What is deduplication in systematic reviews?
The process of removing duplicate records across databases to refine the dataset.
What are the stages of study selection?
Title and abstract screening followed by full-text screening, conducted independently by at least two reviewers.
How should excluded studies be documented?
By specifying reasons for exclusion (e.g., relevance, methodology, or topic mismatch).