Lecture 4: Study Design Flashcards
observational studies
outcomes observed w/ out intervention
experimental studies
researcher manipulates exposure to compare to standard
types of observational studies
- cohort
- case-control
- cross-sectional
cohort study
subjects selected based on exposure
types of cohort study
prospective & retrospective
prospective cohort study
compares disease prevalence in the exposed and unexposed
retrospective cohort study
begins w/ exposure of interest & probe back for exposure
advantages of cohort studies
good for rare exposures; rapid fatal diseases
calculate incident of exposed & unexposed
assess exposure before outcome, study multiple disease/outcome,, decrease error in ascertainment of exposure, complete description = rate of progression & history
disadvantages of cohort studies
inefficient for rare diseases
expensive, long follow up, influenced by secular behavior, diagnostic trends
case-control studies
subjects selected based on disease status (diseased VS non-diseased)
mimic cohort
ID risk indicators
assessed retrospectively
case & controls differ ONLY on past exposure
advantages of case-control studies
efficient for rare diseases, time & $ efficient, can study diseases with long latency periods, evaluate multiple exposures for increase risk for disease
disadvantages of case-control studies
cannot directly compute incidence, cannot establish temporary relationships, not optimal for rare diseases
cross-sectional studies
subjects selected based on NEITHER exposure nor disease status
most basic
“snapshot” in time
advantages of cross-sectional studies
stats valid inference to population, exposure & disease assessed at individual level
disadvantages of cross-sectional studies
temporality cannot be assessed