Lecture 4: Performance Management Flashcards
When is it time for performance management (evaluating whether it works)?
When:
- The structure of the company is in place.
- Responsibilities are assigned to the company’s managers.
- Transfer pricing methods are chosen and implemented.
What are the 3 basic components of the performance management process?
- Define the important measures.
- Set targets for the measures to be able to judge whether actual performance has been good or bad (standards).
- Reward people in the company for their behavior.
What are two ways managers tend to think about measures?
- What gets measured gets done
- If everything is measured, nothing gets done
What are some examples of financial measures?
Sales, EBITDA, cash flow, variable costs, fixed costs, contribution margins, EPS, ROCE, ROE
What are some examples of non-financial measures?
Customer satisfaction, churn rate, employee satisfaction, productivity, delivery precision, sick days, training days, % with formal qualification
A decision must be made about which measures to…
- Follow-up regularly
- Include in a performance report
- Use as basis for performance evaluation
What do we want the structure of our performance report to look like?
Structure all financial measures together, and all non-financial measures together to be able to gain an understanding of both parts. Makes it easier to see if we are under/over performing in specific area
What are the two types of performance measures (NOT fin/non-fin!)?
- Lagging measures
- Historical: focus on what has happened.
- Examples: Financial measures such as ROCE. - Leading measures
- Relates to the means to reach future profitability.
- Indications for the future.
- Examples: non-financial measures such as on-time delivery, number of development projects, reductions in CO2 emissions.
What are Johansson & Östman’s criteria for choosing measures?
- Representational criteria
- How well a measure captures individual events or units in a striking manner.
- Congruence between the measure and the business significance of events.
- Measurement systems criteria
- The quality of how the data for the measure is captured, transformed and used.
- Verifiable, reasonable degree of certainty, lack of personal bias.
- Comparability.
- Resources needed for measurement.
- User criteria
- How well the measure is adopted to the attributes and prerequisites of users/subordinates/those being measured.
- Acceptance
- Simplicity
- Understanding
- Controllability
What are Likierman’s criteria for choosing measures?
Measures can have varying time frames and target different parts of the business.
Horizon 1: Current business
- Cover actions relevant to defending and developing core businesses
- Financial and non-financial metrics
Horizon 2: Emerging business
- Cover actions taken to build emerging business
- Financial and non-financial metrics often linked to sales, marketing and R&D efforts
Horizon 3: New business
- Cover actions to create opportunities for new business
- Non-financial measures often linked to R&D and sustainability, e.g. do we reach pre-established milestones?
What are targets?
The basis/standard against which actual performance is compared
What different types of targets are there?
Predetermined targets:
- Negotiated (e.g. budget)
- Continuous improvements
- Model-based (theoretical)
Internal or external benchmarking:
- Targets derived from the performance of other responsibility centers or of other companies/units in the same industry.
What critique is there of budgets as evaluation targets?
- Time-consuming and costly to put together
- Updated too infrequently and outdated quickly
- Constrain responsiveness and flexibility, often a barrier to change
- Focus on cost reduction and not on value creation
- May lead to “gaming” and perverse behaviors (too challenging → short-term focus)
- Often a “Santa Claus or handbrake”-effect at the end of the year (spending the excess or not spending at all)
- Strengthen vertical command and control (contradicting decentralized decision-making)
What is benchmarking?
- Strong trend internationally
- Every part of the company is judged on how well its performance compares with its internal and/or external peers, given the economic conditions prevailing at the time
- Employees will not know whether they have succeeded until the period is over, highly motivating
- No predetermined targets needed, on-demand allocation of resources
- Business units become smaller, more numerous and more entrepreneurial
- Potential problem: hard to find data for external benchmarking (but: many companies have not even tried)
What is the Handelsbanken way?
Abandoned the budget in the 1970s and does not do any budgets or forecasts at all. Their management control system features:
- Benchmarking. Instead of comparing the outcome with a budget or predetermined target, they compare performance with past performance and competitors’ performance.
- Planning. Plans like activity plans, but without absolute targets.
- Decentralization. Branches are the closest to customers and should hence be the ones making strategic decisions about which direction to take in order to meet customer needs.
- Management compensation. No individual performance-based bonuses. Instead a profit-sharing system where each employee gets an equal share of the profit placed in a retirement pension fund.
- Culture. Corporate culture of decentralization and strong cost consciousness. Shows through low staff turnover.
What signs show success of Handelsbanken?
- Universal bank (10,000 employees)
- Consistently higher ROE
- Consistently better customer satisfaction
- Consistently lowest cost-income ratio
- Among the best employer ratings
What are the principles of Handelsbanken?
- Customer responsiveness
- Freedom and capability to act
- Transparency
What internal and external benchmarking levels does Handelsbanken have?
- Branch-to-branch (internal): cost-income, profit/employee, total profit
- Region-to-region (internal): ROE
- Bank-to-bank (external): ROE
Performance evaluation is important for…
- getting managers and employees to behave in the best interest of the organization
- getting managers and employees motivated
- getting managers and employees to enjoy work and really do their best
However, this is often not enough: there is a need for incentive systems
- Positive and negative incentives (focus on positive incentives)
What are the two theories about incentive systems?
- Agency theory
- Motivation crowding theory