Lecture 4: Group Audit (Part 1) Flashcards

1
Q

What is the Audit Standard relating to Group Audits?

A

ISA 600: Revised and Redrafted, Special Considerations (Audit of Group Financial Statements including the work of component auditors). ISA 600 governs the performance of group auditors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the responsibility of a Group Auditor?

A

They’re in charged of providing audit opinion on the group financial statements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are some of the components of the group financial statements?

A

Subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures and branches.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who can audit components’ financial statements?

A

It can be audited either by group auditors, component auditors or other auditors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the objectives of Group Auditors?

A

1) establish that it is appropriate for them to act as the group auditor
2) gather sufficient & appropriate evidence to reach an opinion on the consolidated F.S.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the 3 steps involved in producing the group financial statement?

A

Stage 1: Gather evidence on the components
Stage 2: Audit the consolidation
Stage 3: Issue the group opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Stage 1: Gather evidence on the components

A
  • involves planning & risk assessment
  • group auditor must understand the group structure, significance (materiality) of each component, mechanics of consolidation process and risk of material misstatement presented by each co.’s F.S.
  • materiality levels should be established for the group in aggregate as well as for the individually significant component
  • involvement in component auditors’ work
  • group auditor cannot simply rely on another auditor’s opinion on the F.S. of the co.
  • a material misstatement in the F.S. of the component co. could become a material misstatement in the F.S. of the group
  • group auditor can either review a report of the work done by component auditors or issue questionnaires to the component auditor
  • after reviewing the work of component auditors, the group auditor can either proceed w/ the consolidated F.S. or identify further work to be carried out to ensure that the F.S. are free from material misstatement.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

If in stage 1 after the group auditor has reviewed the work done by the component auditors and is still not satisfied or convinced that it is free from material misstatements, then what are the steps that can be taken by the group auditor?

A
  • review component auditor’s overall strategy
  • perform risk assessment at the co. level
  • join closing meetings w/ component auditor & management of the co.
  • review parts of component auditor’s working papers
  • discuss w/ component auditor & management regarding those business activities that are significant to the group
  • discuss w/ component auditor the sensitivity of the co.’s F.S. to material error/ misstatement
  • review component auditor’s documentation of identified significant risks & conclusion arrived at those risks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

After taking all the necessary actions in stage 1, what should the group auditor do?

A

The group auditor should have obtained sufficient evidence to show that the individual component co.’s F.S. are free from material misstatement, and are a sound basis for the preparation of the consol F.S.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Stage 2: Auditing the consolidation

A
  • this involves the consolidation process
  • group auditor must plan the audit procedures to be performed on the consolidation process. Thorough planning is essential to ensure that audit risk is minimized
    Types of audit procedures:
  • check that figures taken into consolidation have been accurately extracted from the F.S. of the components
  • evaluate the classifications of the components of the group (ie: are they properly categorized as associates, joint ventures and subsidiaries)
  • review disclosure necessary in the group F.S. (ie: related party transactions)
  • investigate treatment of any components which have a different financial year end from the rest of the group
  • gather evidence appropriate to the specific consolidation adjustments made necessary by financial reporting standards (ie: goodwill & impairment review, cancellation of intra-group transactions, provision of unrealized profits due to inter-company transactions, FV adjustments, retranslation of a foreign currency in the F.S.)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Group auditors must communicate w/ component auditors the evidences that they are expected to gather. When is this done?

A

This communication between the group auditor and component auditor is usually performed at the planning stage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Stage 3: Issuing the group audit opinion

A
  • group auditor issues an opinion on the consolidated (group) financial statement
  • this step is done after a thorough review of all audit evidence gather
  • the group auditor must gather sufficient & appropriate evidence in order to issue an opinion on the consolidated F.S.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Joint Auditing?

A

It is when 2 audit firms are appointed to jointly provide an opinion on a set of F.S.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the benefits of Joint Auditing?

A
  • When a new component is acquired by the group, it’s advantageous to keep the subsidiary’s existing audit firm, which will have already built up considerable knowledge & experiences of the business component
  • group auditor should be appointed together w/ the existing component auditor to jointly provide an opinion on the individual F.S. of co.
  • group auditor & the component auditor can work together to plan the audit, gather evidence, review the work done & finally provide an opinion
  • this provides better availability of resources & the provision of a higher quality audit & assess to staff from both firms of auditor (improves audit efficiency)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the few disadvantages of joint auditing?

A
  • difficult for 2 firms to work together if they use diff audit methods
  • takes up quite some time to develop a joint audit approach
  • cost implication of client, it’s more expensive definitely to use 2 firms of auditors to provide an audit opinion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the 2 types of evidence that auditors should gather?

A

i. evidence regarding individual components of the group, using joint audit arrangement (obtained by group auditor x component auditor)
ii. evidence on the consolidation process must be thorough & planned w/ regards to numerous complex financial reporting standards

17
Q

What are the 2 group audit opinions that will be issued by the group auditor?

A
  1. an opinion on the F.S. of the parent co.
  2. an opinion on the F.S. of the group
    Note: ISA 600 PROHIBITS group auditor from making any reference to the work of other reports/ auditors as this will diminish the creditability of the audit opinion & allow the group auditor to “pass the buck” for responsibility of part of the audit.
18
Q

How can risk of several accidental/ deliberate errors in the F.S. together exceeding the group materiality be minimized?

A

This can be minimized by setting component materiality figures significantly lower than the group materiality figures so that more evidence and audit procedures is carried out by component auditors in order to minimized the risk of material misstatement at the individual co. level, and thereafter the group level.

19
Q

Who sets the component materiality level?

A

The group auditor sets the components materiality level as well as communicate the evidence they’re expected to provide to the group auditors.

20
Q

What are the things to be communicated between group auditor & component auditor at the planning stage?

A
  • any related party transactions within the group
  • identified significant risks (due to error / fraud)
  • method used for testing impairment of goodwill
  • any intra-group transactions
  • any known events after the reporting period
21
Q

What are the possible test of details that can be carried out by auditors?

A
  • line by line agreement of all items from the audited component F.S. to consolidation schedules
  • detailed discussion w/ management on reasons for classification of each components
  • sample testing of known intra-group transactions
  • recalculation of all significant workings (ie: goodwill, NCI, foreign currency translation)
22
Q

What should be done during the final review of financial statements?

A
  • an update on events is given by component auditor to group auditor right before the group opinion is signed
  • group auditors are required in ensuring all material events are reported (true and fair representation)
23
Q

ISA 550 talks about Related Party Transactions.

A
  • has higher risk of material misstatements
  • auditors need to plan & perform the audit w/ professional skepticism, given potential undisclosed related party transactions
  • auditors must remain alertness for related party info when reviewing records / documents at all times
  • related party transactions are normally not carried out at arm’s length transaction.
  • Arm’s length transaction: standard market prices, conducted on terms & conditions as between a willing buyer & a willing seller who’re unrelated & acting independently.