Lecture 4 - Clinical Assessment Flashcards
(44 cards)
Aims of clinical assessment
Aims to chart cognitive, emotional, personality,
and behavioural factors associated with
psychopathology
Assessment can be used to:
– Make a diagnosis
– Identify targets for therapeutic interventions
– Monitor effects of treatment over time
– Conduct research aimed at learning more about psychopathology
Methods of Assessment
1) Clinical observation
2) Clinical interviews
3) Biologically based assessment
4) Psychological tests
Clinical Interviews
- An interview is any interpersonal encounter in which language is used to gather information about a client
- Clinical interviewer
– Pays attention to how a respondent answers questions
– Will be sensitive to emotion associated with a particular topic - Influence of paradigm
- Type of information sought
- How it is obtained
- How it is interpreted
Theoretical stance of interviewer
Psychodynamic Interviewer
- Likely to remain sceptical of verbal reports, look at unconscious
CBT Interviewer
- Focus on circumstances, thoughts and emotions
Regardless of theoretical stance…
important to:
– Develop rapport
– Obtain trust
– Empathise with client (facilitate discussion)
Interviews vary in structure
Generally clinicians tend to conduct using
‘vague’ outlines
Clinical Interview Assessment Example
Client Appearance/Speech & Sensory
Perception
– Client’s appearance, body language and behaviour; Speech pitch/pace impediments?
– Disability?
Client Emotions
– Client’s predominant mood/emotions? Do these vary/alter?
– Suicide ideation?
Assessment Example cont. History
Has there been counselling before? When, Where, Whom, Outcome?
– Support outside of counselling relationship?
– Is any medication being taken? Will this interfere with the client’s ability to engage in our work?
– Are there any boundary issues with other professionals?
(consider confidentiality, other contracts)
– Are there any obvious indications against counselling?
(Alcohol/drug dependency, suicide risk, hospitalisation)
Assessment cont. Concerning Counselling
– Does the client have capacity for insight? Are
they motivated?
– Client’s ability to connect/empathise?
– Presenting Problem? (incl. any client goals)
Assessment cont. Concerning the therapist
– Do I feel competent to work with the issues
that the client brings?
– What thoughts and feelings do I have when I am with this client?– Development of the problem. How will I work with this client?
Limitations of the Clinical Interview
- Unstructured Nature
- Reliability: low test-retest
- Merit of info provided by clients - truthful
- Interviewer Bias: primacy effect, prioritising negative info (Meehl, 1996), influence of client demographics
Structured Interviews
Gathering particular, structured
information
Generally demonstrate good inter-rater
reliability (Blanchard & Brown, 1998)
lowest -> OCD
highest -> alcohol, Narcissistic
Psychological Tests
Structured ways about gathering info
Method of administration
Psychometric approach
– Stable underlying characteristics or traits exist at different levels in everyone
– Assessment of psychopathology symptoms,
intelligence and neurological or cognitive
deficits
Sample Structured Interview
Structured Clinical Interview (SCID) for Axis I DSM-IV
Advantages of Psychological Tests
+ Rigid response requirements
+ Assess client one or more specific characteristics/traits or individual pathology
+ Rigorously tested
+ Standardisation: Comparison to normal distribution, estimate meeting of diagnostic criteria
Personality Inventories
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
(MMPI)– Originally developed with 800 psychiatric and 800 non-psychiatric patients (Hathaway & McKinley, 1943)
– Included only Qs that differentiate the two grps
Updated by Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen et al. (1989)– MMPI-2
* Consists of 567 self-statements re: mood, physical concerns, social attitudes etc. (true, false, cannot say)
MMPI-2
10 Clinical Sub-scales
4 Validity Scales
–Allow estimation of whether client has
provided false information
Range of scores: 0-120
Above 70 indicative of psychopathology
MMPI-2 Validity Sub-scales and Sample Items
Sub-scale: L (lie scale) -> Measurement: Tendency of respondent to respond in a socially acceptable way -> Example Item: ‘I approve of every person I meet’
Other sub-scales: ? (Evasive), F (fake), K (defensive)
MMPI-2 Advantages and Disadvantages
Utility of validity scales
Internal reliability and clinical validity
–Corresponds accurately with clinical diagnoses and ratings of symptoms by clinicians and familial members (Ganellan, 1996; Graham, 1990; Vacha-Hasse, Kogan, Tani & Woodall, 2001)
Time consuming to administer
Short versions available (Dahlstrom & Archer,
2000)
Specific Trait Inventories
State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Spielberger, Gorsuch, & Lushene (1970)
Eating Disorders (Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI-3))
Garner et al. (2004)
Depression (Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)
Beck, et al. (1996)
Specific Trait Inventories: Advantages and Disadvantages
+ Useful as research tools
- Some relatively underdeveloped
+ Potential diagnostic and theoretical value
- Majority fail to include ‘validity’ scales as MMPI
+ Some valuable with good psychometric properties
Projective Tests
Paradigm– ‘A group of tests usually consisting of a standard fixed set of stimuli that are presented to clients, but which are ambiguous enough for clients to put their own interpretation on what the stimuli represent’ (Davey, 2008, p. 35)
Stimuli interpreted according to unconscious
processes revealing true attitudes, motivations
and modes of behaviour – projective hypothesis
Projective Tests Examples
Rorschach Inkblot Test
Thematic Apperception Test
Sentence Completion Test
Rorschach Inkblot test
A projective personality test using inkblots
Client asked to react to each inkblots, one at a time
Client is believed to ‘project’ his or her personality onto
Rorschach Inkblot Test cont.
Responses systematically scored according
to:
* Vagueness/synthesis of multiple images
* Location
* Variety of determinants (shape, colour,
texture etc)
* Form quality (faithfulness to actual form)
* Content
* Degree of mental organising activity
* Illogical/incongruous or incoherent
aspects
(Exner & Weiner, 1995)