// lecture 36 Flashcards
American Energy Innovation Council
Led by people like Bill Gates. Published report stating that US government is not spending enough money on research into energy sources. Claim that fracking bonanza was in part a result of government funded research.
World’s Large Solar Energy Plants
- IvanPah in the Mojave Desert of CA (SW of Las
Vegas, NV on road to LA) produces 377 Mega Watts (MW) 400,000 homes worth. - Built between 2010 and 2013. Three towers have
been built and are operating.
Solar Revolution
Dewa 13 plant in UAE, south of Dubai, 13MW
geothermal power
Taps into hot rocks under the surface of the Earth (This heats water, makes steam to turn turbines).
- US is top producer (2.5 GW) in terms of total capacity (CA, NV, UT)
- Over 15% of the electricity generation in Iceland, Philippines, El Salvador, Costa Rica, and Kenya
- Very steady source (no problems with intermittency)
geothermal energy pros
- Reliable Supply
- Relatively Simple Facilities
- Inexpensive
- Small surface footprint compared to wind and solar
geothermal energy cons
- Regionally limited
- Releases a little CO2 and other more harmful gases from underground
- Enhanced geothermal systems have caused seismic activity during construction
one way to generate nuclear power
1) heat water
2) which makes steam
3) which can turn a turbine.
nuclear power
- Huge in France (80% of electricity there)
- Over 100 plants in the US. No new constructions since 1970s. Obama administration recently approved $8 billion for loans for new plants.
- Many see a “nuclear renaissance” to help move towards
carbon zero energy
Nuclear Power Problems
- New plant construction is rather expensive ($9 billion?)
- Waste disposal remains an issue: Highly radioactive material is produced that must be kept away from life forms. Short term storage on-site, but long term storage? Reprocessing can help but this produces plutonium (can be used in weapons).
nuclear energy pros
- Produces no greenhouse gases
- Available 24 hrs/day
- Plenty of Uranium in US
nuclear energy cons
- Expensive to build facilities
- Storage of extremely hazardous radioactive wastes
- Requires lots of water
- Relationship to weapons (concerns about proliferation)
Carbon Capture and Storage
- Works for CO2 emitted from Coal and Natural Gas Plants, but not applicable to non-point sources (e.g., CO2 emitted from tailpipes).
- Makes energy from coal expensive compared to many other sources, including renewables.
- Risky if CO2 escapes from storage.
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)
- Pumping gases into oil or natural gas fields is sometimes done anyway to increase oil field productivity. Oil companies love this solution.
- Requires a large amount of energy. Increase the fuel needs of the plant by 25-40%.
- Could up to double the cost of energy from coal.
“Clean Coal” is not the same thing as Carbon Capture and Storage
- May include among the following:
• Wash coal to remove harmful chemicals
• Gasify coal by heating it to release and capture SO2, some CO2 is released and often pumped into depleted oil and gas fields to create pressure
• Produce Synfuels, which are burnt later (releasing CO2 later) - When people use this term they aren’t necessarily talking about reducing CO2 emissions at all!
Coal Power in the Pacific NW
WA and OR plants are switching to Natural Gas
Oregon’s only coal plant (Boardman power plant)
recently announced it would close by 2020:
- Biggest source of CO2, nitrous oxide, and sulfur dioxide
pollution in Oregon
- Closing would be 20 years earlier than planned (to avoid installing pollution controls)
Centralia Power Plant is the only coal plant in
Washington:
- 10% of WA emissions, also lots of mercury, sulfur dioxide, etc
- WA state senate approved a bill to support an agreement to switch it entirely away from coal by 2025
Centralia Washington Coal Power Plant
- Centralia, WA also had a coal mine
- Coal mining stopped in November of 2006
- Coal now comes from Powder River Basin (WY)
Combined Cycle Gas Turbine
- A jet engine that runs on methane, with a steam turbine
to get electricity out of the waste heat. - Exhaust from gas turbine, heats water for steam turbine.
Two stages more efficient than one. 55-59% - 270 MW gas turbine coupled to a 130 MW steam turbine
giving 400 MW in total is typical