lecture 3 - physician treatment and referral decision Flashcards
Possible consequences when physicians receive higher prices for their treatments?
-> physicians receive more income, total health expenditures will rise
-> higher intensity of services and improves patients’ health
-> quicker diffusion of new technology
ROLE OF PRICE TRANSPARENCY IN HEALTH CARE
- Stimulates competition
o Insurers prefer lower priced treatments (all else equal) - Is important when insurers have to buy care on behalf of the customers in an efficient way
- Have to benchmark among different healthcare providers
- Steer customers to specific providers
- Exclude expensive providers from the provider network
o Consumers can shop around for lower priced treatments (all else equal) - If there is cost-sharing, consumers can compare prices
o It is fair to know the price of a treatment (check billing accounts) - It is fair to know the price (is the price reasonable for the treatment you got?)
reasons for large variation hospital contract prices across hospitals
- “…different cost-pricing methods of hospitals…”
- “…different technology, wage levels, quality and efficiency of a hospital (including economies of scale and scope) and case-mix differences within DTCs…”
- “… result of differences in hospital strategy and hospital market power…”
- …considerable uncertainty about underlying costs per DTC product…”
reasons for large variation hospital contract prices across insurers
- “… prices may have been ‘mechanically’ adjusted annually to generate the lumpsum payments as negotiated by the insurer and the hospital”
- “…combination of different purchasing strategies and differences in market power between health insurers…”
idea of price transparency
“….publishing price information could narrow the range and lower the level of prices,
1) in part by permitting consumers to engage in more cost-conscious shopping and select lower-cost providers (costs go down) and
2) in part by stimulating price competition on the supply side, forcing high-priced providers to lower their prices (or accept smaller annual increases) in order to remain competitive”. (prices go down)
(Sinaiko & Rosenthal, 2011: 892)
why do patients not choose
- Patients are insured
- Quality is important (…but notoriously difficult to measure)
- Patients do not overrule referrals
- Asymmetric information; you don’t exactly know what you are buying
low utilization of price transparency tool because…
- Unawareness
o They were unaware that they received such a tool - Decisions are driven by physician referrals /established relationships with clinicians
- Complexity
o For many people it was a complex tool and people didn’t know what to do with it - If patients’ OOP costs are the same at high-cost and low-cost doctor, why select the cheaper one?
hospital perspective - (dis)advantages lumpsum
Advantages for hospital
* No production incentives
* Any cost-savings you can realize are profits
* You can concentrate for five years on providing care as efficient as possible (do it your own way)
Disadvantages hospital
* You have to negotiate a high enough lumpsum payment for the coming five years with insurers
* Uncertainty about future health care costs
insurer perspective - (dis)advantages lumpsum
Advantages for insurer
* If you can negotiate a low lumpsum payment for the coming five years, you can save a lot on health care spending
* No risk in hospital spending over time
Disadvantages for insurer
* Hospitals may skimp on quality of care
* Lumpsum is related to hospital cost, not to population costs
o Hospital may send patients to other hospitals
o Hospital may refer care to outside hospital (primary care)
o Insurer has to pay twice, because the patient is going to another hospital and that hospital could have a contract on fee for service
some results after reform with lumpsum
- Less unnecessary care
- Less (intensive care)
- More cooperation with GP
- Organisational change
- Removing production incentives
- Bottom-up initiatives
- Lower turnover and number of patients at the hospital level
* More patients referred to outside the hospital - Not significantly more patients were referred to other hospitals