Lecture 3- Performance Appraisal Flashcards
Evaluation
• Assessment of performance
– Affirm strengths
– Point out weaknesses
– Provide insight into self (both manager and employee)
• Assessment of future possibilities and promotion
Coaching and Development:
- Change or reinforce behaviors
- Provide support and game plan for shoring up weaknesses
- Develop plan for training and development
- Goal Setting
Rater Effects
Ratings vary much more by rater than by ratee
Positive self-illusions
We only want to hear and selectively recall positive
information about ourselves
Sender problems to clear communication
- Illusion of transparency-fallacy that leads us to overestimate how easily we convey our emotions and thoughts
- Sugarcoat negative information
self serving bias
We overestimate our own contributions when a task is successful, more likely to blame a partner when not successful
Input bias
We tend to rate products higher in
quality if we think a lot of time was
spent preparing it
(example where people watched the video but ranked it higher if they were told it the creator spent a lot of time and energy putting it together)
Leniency error
Honest feedback is hard and scary
Halo error
Correlation between dimensions artificially high
-a type of cognitive bias whereby our perception of someone is positively influenced by our opinions of that person’s other related traits
The “forcing” of information
Appraisal is constructed after the evaluation decision is made & appraiser just has to come up with (“force”) reasons for the decision to share
Recency error
“What have you done for me lately?”
Similarity error
“They’re like me, they must be good”
Self-fulfilling expectations
if you treat someone based off a stereotype people often start acting the way you expect them to (attractive vs unattractive/friendly vs colder)
Performance appraisal: best practices
Make perf. appraisals part of a continuous process • Provide people with feedback on a regular basis (and keep in mind the lessons learned in the class on motivation) • Regular feedback will turn the performance appraisal into a review session
Ask questions and get their perspective
• Include a high degree of subordinate participation in the appraisal and development process – self-evaluation
• Don’t just lecture, collect more information to understand context
Provide positive feedback first
• People are receptive to negative feedback when their self has been affirmed (also –do it in the morning!)
• Positive feedback must be sincere
Provide negative feedback second
• Negative feedback must be clear, candid, and tactful
• Be descriptive and specific rather than evaluative and general
• Concentrate on behaviors the individual can control – not traits
End with actions that can be taken. Focus on the positives going forward
• Jointly set goals or objectives
• Agree on actions to be taken