Lecture 3 Flashcards

Word learing

1
Q

why is word learning hard

A
  • point and name is not common and not universal: when pointing and naming, it is usually only nouns (e.g. apple not jumping)
  • the mapping problem
  • hard to get meaning right, often under-extension or over-extension
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

the mapping problem

A
  • many components that it could be labeled with
  • how do children know which topic we are talking about
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

under-extension

A
  • they can’t extend the word e.g. ‘dog’ … how similar do things need to be to fit this… just the family dog? word may be used too narrowly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

over-extension

A

over applying the word e.g. ‘dog’ to anything with 4 legs e.g. lion
- common

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Early word knowledge: comprehension

A
  • comprehension precedes production
  • 6mo infants appear to start comprehending nouns
  • ~10mo start to comprehend verbs
  • 2 yr comprehend 2-3x as many words as they produce
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

early word knowledge: comprehension 2

A
  • between 18-24 months infants get fast on the looking-while-listening task, better at mapping
  • by 18 months they don’t need the full word, already orient to an object e.g. ‘a-‘ for ‘apple’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

early word knowledge: production -first words

A

~12mo first words, 24-30mo ~500 words
- first words from: nouns (cat), verbs (get), social routines (hello), adjectives (cold)
- lack of articles e.g. ‘a’ or ‘the’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

early noun bias

A
  • cross-linguistically, predominance of nouns in early vocabularies e.g. 40% of englihs speaking children’s first 50 words - Nelson 1973
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

hypothesis for early noun bias (1)

A

natural partitions hypothesis
- early nouns denote concrete objects easily individuated from surroundings
- whereas actions/states apply to entities labelled by nouns and are less clearly defined in space + time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

natural partition hypothesis - who

A

Gentner 1982

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

early noun bias hypothesis (2)

A

due to social learning (socially mediated)
- learning occurs in situations where easiest to read adult’s intentions, irrespective of word class e.g. labeling objects in shared attention over a ‘toy’
- also why children learn other kinds of words e.g. breakfast or hello but most common with nouns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

socially mediation -early noun bias - who

A

Tomasello 2003

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Early word knowledge: production errors

A
  • under-extension: word use too specific to a context where it could be used in a wide range e.g. ‘bye’ on the phone (Bates et al 1979)
  • over-extension: word use too general to a context e.g. apple for an orange
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

overextension errors

A
  • frequent until ~2.5 years
  • category error (ball and apple in same category to them as both round)
  • vocabulary limitations (lack the alternative word (so go for closest?))
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why word learning is hard key points

A
  • pointing and naming issues
  • mapping problem
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

early words: what do children know about their language key points

A
  • comprehension
  • production
17
Q

early words: how children learn key points

A
  • teaching words in the lab
  • possible mechanisms to word learning:
    1. innate constraints
    2. structural cues in language
    3. social-pragmatic approach
18
Q

innate constraints on early word learning - early word learning key constraints

A
  1. Object constraint (Gentner 1982): assume word refers to an object, explains early noun bias
    e.g. ‘gavagai’ = paw
  2. whole-object constraint (Markman 1991): words refer to whole objects rather than their parts
    e.g. ‘gavagai’ = whole animal
19
Q

additional constraints on early word learning

A
  1. principle of contrast: no two words have the same meaning, explain how children overcome over-extension e.g. Rico + dog can’t mean the same thing
  2. mutual exclusivity: no object has more than one name, also helps children overcome ‘whole-object constraint’ and learn the names for parts of object
20
Q

problem with constraint theories

A
  • do they explain word learning or just describe it
  • are constraints innate or learned via experience
  • constraints might not be specific to language
21
Q

structural cues to word meaning

A

words, nouns, adjectives occur at different places in sentences
- word order governed language (english)
- where word appears can indicate meaning

22
Q

Syntactic bootstrapping hypothesis

A

where grammatical structure of sentence helps with the meaning of a word

23
Q

Brown 1957

A
  • supporting evidence for syntactic bootstrapping hypothesis
  • 3-5yrs shows pictures of someone kneading a substance in a bowl, had to pick what they thought ‘sib’ was from a selection of pictures
  • they were able to pick the right picture according to syntactic cues
24
Q

nouns

A

refer to objects/categories

25
Q

adjectives

A

refer to properties

26
Q

structural cues to word meaning: noun/adjectives

A

differ in how they are used/ where they appear in sentences

27
Q

Gelman and Markman 1985 - noun/adjectives study

A

study on structural cues to word meaning
- 4 yr-olds pick different objects of the same kind when asked to ‘find the fep one’, but a different object when asked to ‘find the fep’
(3 similar objects - one with spots, one oddly shaped one)

28
Q

Waxman and Booth 2001 - nouns study

A

14 month olds extend novel nouns and adjectives
- with nouns children extend the noun to the category but not the property (e.g. purple house and blue horse given randomly - ‘blicket’ would be a noun referring to a category, therefore both horses fit category, despite all previous ‘blickets’ being purple - as they don’t think blicket is an adjective, its a noun of a category and they understand that)

29
Q

Waxman and Booth 2001 - adjective study

A
  • with adjectives children do not extend to the category or the property (‘blikish’) (give randomly between purple and blue horse when should be purple horse)
  • they know its not a noun, but don’t really understand that its an adjective
30
Q

structural cues to word meaning summary

A

structural cues to nouns learned early, but for other words (e.g. adjectives) words appear later
- 18mo show this (Booth & Waxman)

31
Q

structural cues to word meaning: verbs

A
  • SCs can be used to narrow down verb meanings for 2yr olds
32
Q

issues involving structural cues to word meaning

A
  • children are sensitive to some aspects of sentence structure, but not clear exactly what and when
  • some knowledge of words and word categories is needed to understand their structure
  • studies don’t necessarily show anything about long-term learning, only immediate problem-solving
  • structural information can’t solve all problems: many different meanings, tells you the type not the specifics
33
Q

social pragmatic approach - Tomasello

A
  • children learn words and word meanings from pragmatic cues in the environment which remove ambiguities around word meaning
  • word learning is constrained in two ways:
    1) social world is structured (e.g. routines)
    2) social-cognitive skills the infant has (e.g. joint attention)
34
Q

scaffolding and routines as a part of the social-pragmatic approach

A
  • children learn languages in familiar social contexts in repeated daily routines
  • cross-culturally children are engaged in a wide range of social routines and learn most of their early words in familiar contexts
35
Q

social-cognitive skills: the social-pragmatic approach

A
  • social revolution around 9 mo
  • during joint attention, adults use language and children attempt to interpret the communicative intent
  • word learning occurs when children attempt to interpret communicative intentions
36
Q

joint attention as a part of the social-pragmatic approach

A
  • joint-attention means infants are more likely to learn names for objects
  • gaze-following behaviour at 10 months predicts language skills at 18 months
37
Q

social-pragmatic approach: intention reading

A
  • children can use speakers intention to infer meaning
  • e.g. emotional cue to associate new word with an object
  • can differentiate between intended and accidental actions when learning new verbs
38
Q

word learning summary

A
  • language learning is not isolated: social, cognitive, environmental factors
  • children show key patterns in how they use language: comprehension precedes production, early noun bias
  • children have access to a variety of sources of information when learning word meanings: innate or learned constraints
  • different theories to try to explain how children learn word meanings