Lecture 24 Social Mobility Flashcards
intergenerational earnings elasticity (IEE)
measures how much parents’ income matters in determining childrens’ income when adults
(IEE = 0.4 means that if the parents’ income increases by 1%, the child’s will increase by 0.4%)
IEE equation
IEE = d(ln(ychild) / d(ln(yparent))
countries with high social mobility
Denmark, Finland, Canada, Germany, Sweden
countries with high social mobility
UK, US, South Africa, Brazil
how does the lack of social inequality and mobility feed each other
high inequality means it’s more and more challenging for low-income children to succeed, which leads to high intergenerational persistence
the inequality of opportunity project
using “big data” to study long-run inequality (tax and security records)
question: is america’s reputation as the “land of opportunities” warranted?
answer: overall no, although there is substantial variation in intergenerational mobility across areas in the US
geography of mobility in the US
where you grow up as massive consequences for your future: high mobility in the midwest, low mobility in the south
why is social mobility so much higher in some reasons than others?
places: some places generate little opportunities for upward mobility (local school quality, taxes, employment structure, residential segregation, etc)
people: the people that live in particular locations are less likely to be upwardly mobile (discrimination, culture, tastes and beliefs, family structure, etc)
racial differences
holding parents’ income fixed, upward mobility is relatively low in community zones (CZ) where the share of the black population is large. the authors show that white children also have lower mobility in the CZ with a larger black share. therefore: PLACES, not people