Lecture 23 Inequality Flashcards
three main measures of inequality
quantiles of the distribution, the gini coefficient, top income inequality (income share of the top 5%, 1%, 0.01%…)
the τ-quantile of the income distribution
the value x^τ such that τ% of individuals have an income less than x^τ
popular quantiles
90-10 difference: difference between the 90th and 10th quantile
the interquartile range (IQR): difference between the 75th and 25th quantile
the median: the 50% quantile
the quintiles of a distribution: 0%, 20%, 40%…
the percentiles of a distribution: 0%, 1%, 2%…
the deciles of a distribution: 0%, 10%, 20%…
Gini coefficient
a summary measure of the entire income distribution, ranges from 0 to 1 and measures “how far away we are from perfect equality” (gini of 0 means perfect equality, gini of one means maximum inequality, one individual has everything), the area between the Lorenz curve and the line of perfect equality
Gini coefficient equation
A/(A+B), A being the area between the 45 degree line of equality and the Lorenz curve, B being the area under the Lorenz curve
source of inequality
almost entirely due to rising wages at the (very) top, the wages of the top 10% relative to middle 10% have been rising, but middle 10% to bottom 10% haven’t– the 98% quantile of wage distribution has increased much more than the 95% quantile
earnings
wages * hours or weeks worked
wage and earning dynamics
same dynamics for top earners and the middle class
large drop in hours for low-income households
convergence
between 1950 and 1950, faster wage growth at the bottom of the income percentile range
divergence
between 1980 and 2014, much faster wage growth at the top of the income percentile range
1940-1980
period of inclusive growth
wealth inequality
much larger than income inequality:
top 1% earn 1/3 of US wealth
top 0.01% each 10% of all US wealth
bottom 50% own essentially none of US wealth
increased dramatically
rising return to skill
college premium (average hourly wage of college graduates relative to people without a degree): 90% premium for men
abstract cognitive premium (average hourly wage in abstract cognitive occupations relative to routine occupations): similar to college premium
gender premium
ratio of the average hourly wage of men to the average hourly wage of women
steep decline since 1980 (70% more to 30% more)
decomposing the gender gap
1) 1/3 of the gender gap can’t be explained through observational differences
2) women work, on average, in lower-paying occupations (teacher vs lawyer)
3) women have, on average, less experience (number of years worked in the job)
4) women are, on average, more educated