lecture 2 - two visual systems Flashcards
primary goal of perception in
-psychophysics
-evolutionary perspective
-what are the issues with this?
-psychophysics measures detection and discrimination performance of visual stimuli
-the issues with this are that there is no reference to the relationship between visual inputs and motor inputs (i.e what behaviour are perceptual representations used for ) This is the perceptual approach
Evolutionary perspective: primary role of the visual system is to guide our actions → vision is needed to explore and manipulate the world around us
→ ensure survival and reproduction
-active vision approach
what is the perception action model
-what is it based on
-origins?
Model on how perception and action relate in the human brain
* Based on cortical processing mechanisms
* Origin in animal and neuropsychological (patient) research
* One of the most influential theories on higher visual processing
* Formulated by A.D. Milner & M. A. Goodale (1995)
idea - the visual system is divided in two independent parts dedicated to perception and action respectively
a mini recap of how visual processing works
mention the key areas involved
Key Areas Involved:
Retina: Converts light into neural signals.
Optic Nerve: Transmits signals to the brain, crossing at the optic chiasm.
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus (LGN): Organizes visual information in the thalamus.
Primary Visual Cortex (V1): Analyzes basic features like edges and motion.
Extrastriate Cortex:
V2, V3, V4, V5: Processes shape, color (V4), and motion (V5).
Dorsal Stream: “Where” pathway for spatial awareness (to parietal lobe).
Ventral Stream: “What” pathway for object recognition (to temporal lobe)
lesion study in monkeys
-results
-monkeys used in an experiment
task 1
-used to do object discrimination ‘what’
task 2
-used to do landmark discrimination task ‘where’
Lesion to the ventral stream impairs recognition and identification of objects (“What”)
Lesions to the dorsal stream impairs perception of spatial relations between objects (“Where”)
what are the ‘what’ and ‘how’ streams in vision, and what are their properties
what - the ventral stream
vision perception
-object identification and recognition
Properties : allocentric frame of reference, relative metrics, long term
storage, conscious
‘how’ - the dorsal stream
visuomotor control
vision for action
properties: online processing,
metrically accurate, egocentric frame of reference, quick
decay, unconscious
-
the pathway in which visual information is processed depends on….
on the intended purpose
what is an implication of the perception-action model / two visual stream model
-(Milner & Goodale, 2006)
“A major implication of our model is the counterintuitive idea that people’s perception of the visual world does not always follow the same rules as their behavioural interactions with this world.”
evidence for perception action model
-ventral stream
patient with ventral stream damage
-famous neuropsychological patient (DF): bilateral lesions in area LOC
(ventral stream) showing a visual form agnosia (patient left with a lesion laterally in her ventral stream)
-Patient DF struggles to recognise and identify objects (no form or shape perception). Note that
she can identify texture and colour of objects.
if shown a model photo she cant copy it correctly but if asked to draw it from memory she can.
-as soon as she stops drawing it she wont recognise it.
evidence for perception action model
-ventral stream
-what is perception action dissociation and what does this suggest
Perception-Action Dissociation:
Patient DF has issues with perceptual tasks
(e.g., can’t report the size of an object) but shows almost normal performance in a corresponding action task (e.g., when grasping she adjusts the opening of her hand to object size [which she is unable to report perceptually]
Suggests that ventral stream (which is damaged) is important for perception – such as recognising size and shape of objects
evidence
-dorsal stream
Dorsal stream damage:
Associated with optic ataxia – a
disorder where patients struggle
to perform visually guided actions
but have no problem with
perceptual tasks
→ opposite pattern to visual form
agnosia patients
Suggests that dorsal stream (which is damaged) is important for visual guidance of actions.
double dissociation
-evidence
Double dissociation means that two cognitive functions are independent of each other, based on evidence from brain lesions or disorders
This double dissociation shows that the ventral and dorsal streams are functionally independent; damage to one affects only specific aspects of perception while leaving others intact. but you don’t realise them being independent as they wotk together
example of double dissociation - perception and action
Perception vs. Action:
Patient A: Impaired object recognition (perception) but intact motor skills (can reach for objects).
Patient B: Impaired motor skills (action) but intact object recognition (can name objects).
Selective deficit (such as issues with action tasks) cannot be attributed to
differences in…
complementary deficits of patients with ventral stream damage (visual form agnosia) and dorsal stream damage (optic ataxia) supports the idea that…
difficulty
-suggests that the affected process relys on one neural system
Complementary deficits of patients with ventral stream damage (visual form agnosia) and dorsal stream damage (optic ataxia) inspired/supported the idea that
the ventral stream mediates “vision for perception” and the dorsal stream “vision for action
- two different systems
-visual form agnosia
-optic ataxia
- Two different systems- (ventral and dorsal) that process visual information for perceptual and visuomotor tasks respectively. Both systems are assumed to
work largely independently.
2) Visual form agnosia is a disorder that is caused by damage to ventral stream areas. Patients have particular problems with perceptual tasks but show (nearly) normal behaviour in visuomotor tasks
3) Optic ataxia is a disorder that is caused by damage to dorsal stream areas. Patients have particular problems with visually guided action tasks but show (nearly) normal behaviour in perceptual tasks.
what are the limits of clinical case studies
Neuropsychological evidence on its own cannot unequivocally prove that the perceptual system is not involved in the visual guidance of actions
→ Patients may rely on different information / may have developed different strategies or may use alternative processing systems (brain plasticity)
→Evidence that vision for perception and vision for action are distinct in the healthy human brain is needed!
- A number of paradigms have been frequently used to illustrate
dissociations in neurologically healthy participants (Visual illusions, Garner
paradigm, Weber’s Law etc.)