lecture 1 - introduction and measuring perception Flashcards

1
Q

History of Psychophysics
assumption about mind and body until the mid 1800s

A

assumption that mind and body are separate from each
other:
- Body = physical: can be measured & studied
- Mind = non-physical/invisible: cannot be measured & studied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

History of psychophysics
1850s
1860s

A

1850 (22nd of October)
Gustav Fechner: body and mind are not independent!
→ mind can be studied by measuring the relationship between changes
in physical stimulation (body) and a person’s experience (mind)

  • 1860: Fechner published: “Elements of Psychophysics”: proposes a
    number of methods to study the relationship between the mental and
    the physical → includes proposal of 3 techniques to measure thresholds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is psychophysics

A

the scientific study of the relationship between the physical stimulus and the perceptions evoked by it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is a threshold
2 types of thresholds

A

-measures the limits of the sensory system

absolute thresholds -measure the minimum of a stimulus that can be
perceived by one of our senses (e.g., smallest amount of light energy we can
see, smallest concentration of chemicals we can smell or taste etc…)

Difference thresholds- measure the smallest difference between two stimuli a person can detect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Psychophysics deconstructed
MTM

A

method - physical stimulus , how do we select and present the stimulus ?
-methods of limits
-methods of adjustment
- method of constant stimuli (classical psychophysics)

Task
what does the participant do?
-magnitude estimation
-detection
-discrimination
-matching
-recognition

measure (behaviour/ experience)
-how do we characterise behaviour?
(dependent variable)
-phenomenological report (what do you see?)
-reaction time
-physical tasks and judgements (lift it, how heavy is it etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Psychophysical methods to measure thresholds
-classically used to determine absolute thresholds

A

1) methods of limits
2) methods of adjustment
3) methods of constant stimuli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the methods of limits, how does it measure thresholds
-what is a cross over point
-repeat?

A

Experimenter presents stimuli in
ascending (intensity increases) or
descending (intensity decreases) order

  • Determines “cross-over” points – where participants perception changes (from noticed to unnoticed or vice versa) (receiving stimulus to not receiving)
  • Several runs starting equally often
    above and below threshold
  • the absolute Threshold = average of cross-over
    points (after all the runs)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is Method of adjustment
-give an example
-pros/cons

A

The participant (not the
experimenter!) adjusts the stimulus
intensity
example of this is getting participant to reduce contrast until stimulus is no longer visible

  • Relatively fast method as
    participants can adjust the stimulus
    themselves in a few trials
  • However, is “frowned” upon (i.e.,
    quick and dirty approach)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the method of constant stimuli
-repeats ?
-how do you get to the threshold

A

-the experimenter presents stimuli of different intensity in random order , and the participants indicate their perception

-Stimuli must be chosen so that the
weakest is never detected and the
strongest always detected (typically 5-9 different intensities

  • Many repeated presentations –
    determine the percentage of correct
    detections
  • Threshold = intensity at which stimulus is detected 50% of all time (look at graph) (the percentage of stimuli detected being 50%)

so etc intensity 180 is detected 50% of the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

method of constant stimuli
-pros/ cons

A

pros
-more accurate than methods of limits and adjustment
-involves more observations and stimuli are presented in random order (reduces order and expectation effects)

cons
-very time consuming

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

methods of constant stimulus ,
how can some of the problems related to expectations of subjects and order effects can be solved ?

A

-forced choice procedures
-adaptive staircase method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

explain forced choice procedures (2-AFC and 2-IFC)
-what would the ideal observer see compared to the real human

A

-forced choice procedure patterns are presented side by side
(or one after the other), participants
task which side (or time interval)
contains the grating (until grating is
to faint to see).

If participants can’t see the grating at all they should obtain about 50%
correct (guessing chance).
Threshold determined at 75% correct.

look at graphs of ideal observer (no noise or uncertainty etc) compared to the real human - probability that a target is detected increases gradually

-decreases the chance of expectation of order and expectation effects just like methods of constant stimuli)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

adaptive staircase procedure
up down
-what is it
-what issues does it deal with
-what issues are there with this

A

Adaptive procedure knows, every time it knows you you hear the sound/received the stimulus it’ll go down and vice versa when you cant hear the sound

Previous example: 11 contrasts – to get reliable threshold
measures many repetitions required (e.g., N=40 per
contrast) = 440 trials

  • Present intensities that actually include the threshold
    (otherwise pointless)!
  • Staircase deals with those issues: starts with clearly
    perceivable stimulus: if correctly identified decreases the
    intensity – until an error occurs → increases intensity
    again (fast and very few trials required)
  • Averaging over the transition or reversal points to
    determine threshold
  • Issues:
    Where to start? Which step size? Which procedure?
    When to stop? Participant expectation…
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

psychophysical tasks to determine thresholds

A

detection
discrimination
matching

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

detection
discrimination
matching

A

1.Detection: “Is the stimulus there?”
2-AFC: On which side is the stimulus
presented?

  1. Discrimination: “Which stimulus is
    stronger?”
    2-AFC: Which side contains the higher contrast stimulus?
  2. Matching: “Adjust one out of two
    stimuli so that they look/sound/feel
    the same”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is Weber’s Law
example
-size of difference threshold depends on…

A

The ratio between the difference threshold and the intensity of the standard is constant

What is the smallest difference
between stimuli that humans can
detect?
* Participants are asked to detect a
difference between two stimuli (e.g.,
“same” vs. “different judgment”)
(the weight example 2/100, 4/200- 0.02)
* Size of the difference threshold
depends on the size of the standard
stimulus!

17
Q

difference thresholds and weber’s law equation
is webers law true for every stimulus

A

eg
electric shock - 0.01
lifted weight - 0.02

Weber’s Law is true for most senses
(as long as long as the stimulus
intensity is not too close to the
absolute threshold)
* Weber’s Fraction depends on the
sensory dimension measured!

Weber’s Law Equation: K = DT/S
(observed by Weber empirically, mathematically formalised by Fechner):
K… constant (called Weber’s fraction)
DT = Difference Threshold
S = Value of the standard stimulus

18
Q

measuring perception above the threshold
-magnitude estimation

A

Magnitude Estimation: Participants rate the size or intensity of a stimulus on a numeric scale
(e.g., 1-10 – how loud it sounds, how bright it is etc.) in relation to a standard stimulus. (so can go above the threshold)

→ Measures the relationship between physical
stimulus and the perception of their magnitude

19
Q

doubling physical intensity - does it double the perceptual experience

A

Doubling physical intensity does not
necessary cause double the perceptual experience!

20
Q

magnitude estimation
-response compression
-response expansion

A

response compression - Increase in perceived magnitude is smaller than the increase in stimulus intensity (e.g., brightness

response expansion - Increase in perceived magnitude is larger than the increase in stimulus intensity (e.g., electric shock)

21
Q

Relationship between intensity of a stimulus and perception of its magnitude can be described by…

A

a power function: Steven’s power law: P = K*Sn
* Exponent (n) <1 = Response compression
* Exponent (n) >1 = Response expansion

22
Q

issues when measuring perception

A

-different people observe differently to each other
Example: of (“yes”/”no”) responses of 2 different observers
(Julie and Regina) in Constant Stimuli experiment (testing 5
different light intensities)
* Lower threshold for Julie than for Regina
* Does this means Julie is more sensitive to light?

RESPONSE CRITERIA
-Julie decides to say “yes” at the flimsiest evidence that a
light was there (liberal responder, “yes-sayer”)
* Regina needs to be really sure that the light is there before
saying “yes” (conservative responder)
* Different response criteria may lead to erroneous
conclusions about perceptual sensitivity!

this is only important when comparing 2 or few people

23
Q

what is a signal detection experiment
-what is it
-what is present
-outcomes, why can their be mistakes

A

In classical signal-detection experiments, the observer either responds “yes” or “no” regarding the presence of the signal on each trial. Correctly indicating that a stimulus is present is called a hit, and correctly indicating that a stimulus is absent is called a correct rejection

-stimulus intensity is either present or absent (different to threshold experiment)

4 possible outcomes between
presences/absence of the stimulus and a person’s response. hit, miss, false alarm, correct rejection

  • Mistakes due to our perception being “noisy”
    (internal noise in neural responses vs. external noise, e.g., distortion in image, glitch
    in the radar etc…