Lecture 2: Intro to developmental psychology Flashcards
Human phylogeny
the evolution of the species
Human Ontogeny
he evolution of individual organism Ontogeny is thought to recapitulate/ repeat the process of phylogeny
Plato
Plato emphasised self control and discipline
Plato believed that children are born with innate knowledge of how the world works (nativist)
Aristotle
Aristotle was concerned with fitting child rearing to the needs of the individual child
Aristotle believed that knowledge comes from experience (empiricist)
Locke and late philosophers
The English philosopher John Locke, like Aristotle, saw the child as a tabula rasa (blank slate) and advocated first instilling discipline, then gradually increasing the child’s freedom
similar to aristotle (through experience) but also agreed that discipline comes first like plato
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the French philosopher, argued that parents and society should give the child maximum freedom from the beginning
Research based approaches
- Social reform movements provided some of the earliest descriptions of the adverse effects that harsh environments can have on child development
- Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution inspired research in child development in order to gain insights into the nature of the species (studied own son William)
How to study development
The scientific method is an approach to testing beliefs which involves:
Choosing a question
Formulating hypothesis (e.g. an educated guess)
Testing those hypotheses
Forming conclusions
Naturalistic Observation
Good ecological validity Similar to “real-life”- presence of researcher potentially less likely to impact people involved as in their natural env
Can be used to study a range of behaviour
Limitations of Naturalistic observations
Hard to identify causal relationships – there are so many variables, it is often hard to know which ones influenced the behaviour of interest
Painstaking to administer – many behaviours occur only occasionally in everyday environments, so researchers’ opportunities to study them through naturalistic observation are reduced
Interviews
Allows full focus on the individual’s behavioural pattern
Follow up questions can clarify an earlier response- allows follow up on relevant info to the observation
Experimenter: When Teddy said “Oh great!”, did he mean it was nice or nasty? Child: Nasty. Experimenter: How do you know that?
Limitations of interviews
Can be difficult to generalise beyond the individual case
Can be difficult to generate a causal argument
Experiment
Can directly test relationships between variables
Experimental control is relatively easy
Limitations of experiments
“artificial” technique – so perhaps lacking in ecological validity unless using “naturalistic” experiments- ethical issues could arise
Sometimes are not possible due to ethical issues (or practical issues)
Naturalistic experiments
Although experiments have the unique advantage of allowing researchers to draw conclusions about the causes of events, their ecological validity can be questionable
This problem can be overcome by conducting naturalistic experiments, in which data are collected in everyday settings such as the home or in a special playroom at the testing lab
Cross-sectional designs
(groups of) children of different ages are compared on a given behaviour or characteristic over a short period of time
Common