Lecture 2 - Approaches the Personality 2 Flashcards

1
Q

What is a lexical hypothesis?

A

All aspects of individual personality can be described from single words used in language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did Allport/Odbert do?

A

Collected all personality terms from Webster’s Dictionary

Found 555,000 words –> selected all terms referring to behavioural diffs – 18,000 –> removed terms relating to cognitive, physical, transient states – 4500

Much overlap in meaning, 4500 likely represent smaller number of distinct traits (Eg. Calm vs Relaxed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the difference between latent and physical variables?

A

Physical variables (height/weight) can be directly observed/measured, most psychological variables can’t

Hidden/latent variables must be inferred/estimated

Psychometrics – scientific measurement of psychological variables: example – Extraversion –> enjoys talking to others (talkative), enjoys socialising (sociable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are correlations?

A

Basis of data reduction techniques, enables us to determine which terms related + represent common ‘latent factor’
o Eg. I am a RELAXED PERSON/I am a CAREFREE PERSON/I am a FRIENDLY PERSON rated on scale + look for correlations
o If strong correlation, likely related to common latent factor, if weak not related

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a correlation matrix?

A

Shows relationships between each pair, difficult to work out which ones exactly belong together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is factor analysis?

A

Multivariate data reduction technique, looks for set of latent variables that best account for pattern of correlation within dataset

Researcher must decide how many factors to extract + names factor based on items that load on it

For independent factors items should load strong on only one factor (low cross loadings)

Data can be reduced from 7 items to 2 underlying latent factors, values show correlations between liking rating for each item + underlying factors (factor loadings)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Raymond Cattell’s 16 Personality Factors Model?

A

Started with 4500 terms –> worked w/ teams of raters to make groups of synonyms/antonyms + selected exemplar to reduce overall number of words – 171 terms

Rated one/two people on all 171 terms –> examined correlations to identify 60 clusters, added few more from psychiatric literature

Reduced to about 45 terms based on own judgement + guidance from literature

Factor analysed range of data relating to 45 terms ‘surface traits’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is good/bad about Raymond Cattell’s 16 personality traits model?

A

Scales, not categories, listed in order of importance/variance explained

Controversial thing – Factor B maps onto intelligence

Negatives: subjectivity/arbitrariness in analysis, failures to replicate, sixteen – too many, correlations between factors not completely independent, better accounted for by fewer/independent factors?
o Analysis of same data has found 5 independent factors (Extraversion, anxiety, self control, independence/accommodation/opennes)

Positives: methodical/data driven approach to develop theory, promoted use of Factor analysis in personality research, revised 16PF questionnaires still used, basis of subsequent big 5 models

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How did the 16 Personalities Model lead to the Big Five model of personality?

A

Cattell –> evidence for five ‘super’ factors, other work based on lexical hypothesis also showed 5 factors

Convergence of models showing 5 independent factors – slightly diff names/descriptions

5 factors necessary/reasonably sufficient for describing major features of personality at global level (McCrae + Costa)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Costa/McCrae do? (1985)

A

Identified neuroticism + extraversion at first, then adding openness to experience

Thought too little factors, went back to literature and added agreeableness + conscientiousness (From Goldberg’s five factor model)

NEOAC – OCEAN, developed NEO-Personality Inventory/NEO-PI-R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are facets under each super trait in the Big Five?

A

Primary traits) of each super trait, each facet measured w/ several items

Neuroticism – anxiety, vulnerability, angry hostility, depression, self-consciousness, impulsiveness

Extraversion – warmth, gregariousness, assertiveness, activity, positive emotions, excitement seeking

Openness to experience – fantasy, aesthetics, feelings, actions, ideas, values

Agreeableness – trust, altruism, straightforwardness, compliance, modesty, tender-mindedness

Conscientiousness – competence, order, dutifulness, self-discipline, deliberation, achievement-striving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Eysenck’s Gigantic Three?

A

Eysenck – 3 (PEN), openness is intelligence not personality, agreeableness is just Low P/Low N/High E

Costa + McCrae found correlations between scores on PEN/OCEAN scales (some high – E/N, most low)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the critique for OCEAN?

A

Factors from factor analysis depend on which variables entered in first place + # of factors extracted (diff solutions)

Single words insufficient to describe all aspects (eg. Pecking order personality, diff contexts)

Overreliance on lay person (undergrads) results in important omissions

Simple correlations don’t capture full complexity of relationships between terms

Arbitrary choice of 6 facets per factor, some important factors (narcissism) not considered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What discussion has there been on OCEAN?

A

Evidence for cross-cultural stability, emerging evidence for biological basis for some factors

Most widely used, useful common currency in research

Other Models could be:
Alternative Big Five (Zuckerman, 1999) - Impulsive Unsocialised Sensation Seeking, Aggression/Hostility, Activity, Sociability, Neuroticism/Anxiety

HEXACO (Lee + Ashton, 2004) - Honesty/Humility, Emotionality, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Openness to Experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly