Lecture 2 Flashcards
How human behaviour leads to different outcomes for different groups => triple jeaopardy
What do we talk about when we are talking about triple jeopardy?
- Categorization and (negative) stereotyping
- Solo status and salience of group membership
- Token status
What groups are affected by triple jeopardy?
Different groups, but especially stigmatized groups.
What are the thoughts of the people that use triple jeopardy?
People are probably not even aware that they are doing it.
It is very subtle and people might not even have a negative intention but it leads to a different outcome.
What is triple jeopardy and how is it developed?
Phenomena that develop through social interaction between individuals within social groups.
What is the relation between micro aggression and stereotypes?
Micro aggression might come from stereotyping.
Negative attitudes are more involved in micro aggression than in triple jeopardy.
And triple jeopardy does not lead to aggression.
Where does stereotyping come from?
Categorization
Why do we categorize?
The reason we use categorization is to simplify the world around us. If we wouldn’t categorize things, things would get very complicated and everything would be nuanced.
We don’t have the cognitive capacity to make sense of the world if we don’t simplify. So it has certain functional purposes.
Ingroup vs. outgroup
- A very common categorization.
- Is someone part of my group (ingroup) or part of another group (outgroup).
- This is something we all do, we can’t escape from it.
When does categorization become a problem?
When categorization is attached to status.
When the categories are not neutral.
Low status vs. high status groups
- We attach certain status to certain groups.
- Status is not something permanent.
- Groups that are stigmatized and are discriminated against, are groups that get a low status.
- Status is dependent on a lot of factors, especially the context of where the groups operate.
What determines whether a category is relevant or matters?
- Salience of the category
- Cognitive availability of the category
- Cultural importance of the category
Salience of the category
The extent to which the category stands out, is easy to notice, is considered relevant.
- For example: after a case regarding George Floyd, the notion of racial minority/majority group becomes salient.
Cognitive availability of the category
- Whether or not the category is readily available in our mind.
- It is related to saliency.
- Which category is more often or was most recently used?
Cultural importance of the category
To what extent is the category considered important in a certain cultural context?
Whether or not a category becomes important is dependent on where the category is located or exists.
- E.g., royals vs. non-royals in some cultural contexts is important.
- E.g., in a religious community, whether you are part of a religious group or not is very important.
What processes are similar across categories?
Low versus high status; ingroup versus outgroup processes
How are stereotypes formed (cognitional)?
We perceive an (illusory) correlation between categories and traits.
- How we link the category to certain traits.
- The stereotype is very much related to how we connect certain groups to certain traits.
When are stereotypes formed more easily?
In small groups and negative characteristics.
- E.g., overestimation of the relation between a certain ethnicity and criminality.
- “If you’re part of this group then maybe you intent to commit certain behaviours”
Why are stereotypes so dangerous?
Because we don’t have bad intentions and are not even aware that it is something bad, this makes it even more dangerous and more prevalent.
What are stereotypes?
Cognitive associations between membership of a particular group and certain traits, characteristics, or behaviours.
Stereotypes are about the link; the illusionary correlation.
Who uses stereotypes?
Both ingroup and outgroup.
What are the functions of stereotypes?
- Cognitive
- Social/cultural
- Emotional
What is the cognitive function of stereotypes?
Understanding the social world
- It simplifies the way we see this world
- “A group will always behave a certain way”
What is the social/cultural function of stereotypes?
Understanding what we belong to
- “Of course I act this way, because I’m part of this group”
What is the emotional function of stereotypes?
To feel better about ourselves or our group
- Some stereotypes can be positive
- It is very much dependent on whether the group you are attached to has high connotations or a high status
How are stereotypes formed (socially)?
- Socialization
- Social roles
- Salience
- Personal experience
Socialization and the forming of stereotypes
It is very important to keep ourselves and our attitudes in check.
Children learn about stereotypes in their early years from observation.
- E.g., experiment with a white and a black doll and questions about which doll is prettier, uglier, smarter, nicer, etc.
Social roles and the forming of stereotypes
- Each of us plays a social role and interacts according to this role.
- Social roles can give birth to stereotypes.
- In societies where hierarchy is very close, you are doomed, if you are born in a family with low level social roles, you are more likely to be perceived a certain way.
Salience and the forming of stereotypes
- We tend to notice things that are rare/look unique/different from the majority).
- In a society, a minority is always rarer than the majority, and thus more salient.
- When a member of a minority engages in a behaviour that also stands out, people have the tendency to make a link between the group and the behaviour => generalization.
Personal experience and the forming of stereotypes
- Making a generalization of a group based on personal experience.
- “I’ve seen the evidence so it is true.”
- But have the things that they have seen also happened in other contexts? Probably not, but people tend to trust their own experience, which contributes to stereotypes.
What reinforces stereotypes?
Social interaction and personal experiences.
There is an interaction between personal experiences and other peoples experiences and what they talk about. This creates an illusion between traits and groups.
When can you make a generalization?
You can never make a generalization without evidence of research.
Stereotype content model
How we judge groups is on the basis of warmth and competence.
It is a plus sign with a horizontal line going from – (left) to + (right) that stands for competence and a vertical line with competence from – (below) to + (above) that stands for warmth.
High warmth + low competence according to the stereotype content model
- Paternalistic prejudice
- Low status, not competitive
- Pity, sympathy
- E.g., elderly people, disabled
High warmth + high competence according to the stereotype content model
- Admiration
- High status, not competitive
- Pride, admiration
- E.g., in-group, close allies
Low warmth + low competence according to the stereotype content model
- Contemptuous prejudice
- Low status, competitive
- Contempt, disgust, anger, resentment
- E.g., welfare recipients, poor people
Low warmth + high competence according to the stereotype content model
- Envious prejudice
- High status, competitive
- Envy, jealousy
- E.g., Asians, Jews, rich people, feminists