Lecture 17: Advanced evidence types Flashcards
1
Q
Glitter
A
- Not the same as shimmer!
- Synthetic multilayered particles - plastic (polyethylene terephthalate/PBT/PMMA) or aluminium, or a hybrid
- Cut from rolled sheets – tend to be hexagonal, square or rectangular, can be custom shaped
- Can be layers of plastics or layers dispersed with aluminum or just aluminium itself
- Shapes are more cost effective to produce
- Custom shapes will be larger as theyre meant to be seen.
- Can be found in decorative cosmetics, sunscreens and various personal care products
- Also in gel pens, temporary tattoos, glues, paints, toy slime, on glass, or loose (no vehicle)
- No vehicle means on it’s own.
- Glitter encrusted garments or woven into fabrics, threads, strands and yarns.
2
Q
Glitter vs shimmer
A
- Shimmer is predominantly mica based (muscovite)
- Used on its own → pearlescent effects
- Used as a substrate then coated with various metal oxide layers – TiO2, Fe2O3, Fe3O4, BiOCl, SnO2, carmine, ferric ferrocyanide, chromium oxide → interference effects
- Glitter is synthetic; mica based shimmer is natural
- Whether mica is used alone, or coated with metal oxides, it never contains plastic; glitter almost always does (see later slides though!)
- Glitter (of a given type) will have identically shaped and sized particles; shimmer particles are irregularly and randomly shaped and sized.
3
Q
Recovery considerations for glitter
A
- Unlike cosmetic traces, glitter (and shimmer) should be analysed as multilayered paint flakes
- Use a high intensity light source!
- Must not be lifted with J-Lar or acetate – post-its
- Glass or plastic vial is the best option, then bag
- Embedded particles must not be removed at scene
- Don’t refrigerate or freeze
- Use a high intensity light source to help recover glitter.
- Multilayerd particles are prone to delayering
- Water could delaminate the layers
4
Q
Analytical workflow for glitter
A
- Gross examination, recovery and collection
- Preliminary evaluation of physical characteristics – micrometer gauge or microscopically
- Physical fit assessment – manufacturing defects
- All microscopic techniques – reflectance and transmission modes (x700 for morphology)
- Microspectrophotometry – even more important when considering optically variable colours
- (ATR) Infrared spectroscopy – plastic chemistry
- Specific gravity – ensure colour fast first!
- Raman (micro) spectroscopy – polymer layers, can’t be used to detect aluminium
- SEM-EDX – microstructure detail and elemental composition of layers (aluminium)
- Physical characteristics are one of the most important parts.
5
Q
Analytical workflow for glitter
Additional information
A
- Physical fit doesn’t apply in the same way it does for paint
- Glitter particles are so small it’s highly unlikely it would break up and you’d be able to find a match
- Manufacturing defects can be almost as probative as a physical fit assessment.
- MSP is more important here than it is with any other form of trace evidence as the colours are optical variable.
- There is a huge amount of subjectivity when it comes to determining colour due to it looking different under different lights.
- Identify where it neither floats nor sinks between the two layers gives the gravity measurement but make sure you determine the colour first.
6
Q
Interpretation of glitter
Part one
A
- Number of particles and their physical dimensions
- Location of particles – context!
- Number, sequence, thickness and colour (beware subjectivity!) of layers
- Manufacturing defects, weathering, delamination, corrosion, damage.
- Location gives you crime reconstruction
- Manufacturing defects can be highly discriminatory and has high probative value.
- Potential to match the defects to an actual machine and therefore manufacturer.
- Oblique or alternate lighting as particles reflect differently
- Alternate between black, grey, and white backgrounds to facilitate colour determinations
- Q vs. K comparisons must be performed side-by-side using the same background colour
- ATR-FTIR for plastic chemistry – both sides!
- Currently, no forensic glitter database exists but would be much easier than for cosmetics
- Very limited research on background, transfer, persistence, activity level, etc.
7
Q
Intrepretation of glitter
Part two
A
- Glitter particle don’t necessarily have the same layer sandwiched on both sides
- Glitter takes years to degrade
- Substrate considerations (absence ≠ absence)
- Multiple associations mitigate coincidental transfer
- Nature of contact/forces involved
- Two-way transfer also applies but beware high retention → background levels.
- Glitter sticks really where but won’t stick well to shiny surface as well e.g satin or silk.
- Because it has such a high retention value background levels need to be considered when interpreting and determining context.
- Not quite as overlooked as cosmetic evidence – see case studies in the workshops…
- As with other types of trace → expensive, time-consuming, skilled analysis
- Small differences in peak intensities can be a discriminating factor
- Running a PCA could be helpful to pull the differences apart and give number stats.
8
Q
Why is glitter the ideal trace evidence?
A
- Highly individualistic, e.g. size, shape, thickness, specific gravity, morphology, number and thickness of layers, chemistry of layers, colour, special effects, manufacturer and/or geographical origin, cutting defects, vehicle, etc.
- Glitter is highly variable and they change a lot.
- SEM can detect difference in glitter cross sections
- Nearly invisible (until it catches the light!)
- High probability of transfer and retention
- Quickly collected, separated and concentrated
- Easily characterised (only a single particle required)
- Relatively persistent and resistant to degradation
- Unless its loose glitter it needs separating which is usually easy to do.
- Not effected by rain or UV radiation
9
Q
Drawbacks of glitter
A
Consumes a lot of microplastic
10
Q
Glitter alternatives
A
- Eucalyptus tree derived cellulose – Lyocell (rayon)
- Glass based glitter particles – The Unseen Spectra