Lecture 17 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Understand the graph on slide 3

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

what degree of causality is a proximal cause?

A

one degree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What happens when you try to look beyond the proximal causes for neonatal mortality?

A

if you try to get beyond the proximal causes you get outside of the health care field pretty quickly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why does causal complexity matter?

A

The reason causal complexity matters is because it completely determines what we do. We often say lets be solution focused but sometimes what happens when we do that is we forget the model that we’re working with.

what level of causality you look at changes the solutions that are implemented

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is birth spacing?

A

the time between 2 consecutive births

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When you are looking at 2 levels of causality what are you trying to figure out? What do levels of causality refer to?

A

What is causing the cause?

Levels refers to consecutive connections. This can thoguht of a meta analysis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When are we looking at 1 level of causality for neonatal mortality?

A

when we’re looking at complications during birth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When are we looking at 2 levels of causality for neonatal mortality?

A

When we’re looking at individual factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When are we looking at 3 levels of causality for neonatal mortality?

A

When we’re looking at societal factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

UNDERSTAND THE IMAGES ON SLIDE 7

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

is the number of causes related to the causal complexity? Why is it easier to deal wit more causes rather than more levels of complexity?

A

the number of causes is not related to causal complexity. Complexity is about how the causes are arranged.

when we look at more causes we can divide and conquer

the causes are independently trying to explain so it is only one cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is causal complexity referring to? Why is this more difficult to deal with this level of complexity?

A

the number of levels of causality (number of successive causal relations )

more difficult because specialists have to collaborate her eand the knowledge of causes has to be integrated.

if we have 3 levels of causality A tries to explain B, B tries to explain C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

KNOW THE MODEL FROM SLIDE 9 for the FINAL

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

CREATE A SLIDE FOR THE MODEL ON SLIDE 9 (i’m too lazy rn)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How complex is this model in terms of levels of causality? This model includes:

a) no levels of causality
b) 1 level of causality
c) 2 levels of causality
a) Yes
d) 3 levels of causality
e) 4 levels of causality

A

B

This is a model of neonatal mortality and the delay to recieve medical care that is being analyzed is actual only one level of causality. They are actually only addressing the proximal cause because the other things are being considered only to enhance the provision of medical care.

the figure presents a sequence of steps for how medical care may be provided during birth in an attempt to mitigate the complications once they occur. The model is not using two levels of causality because it isn’t trying to prevent the problems that happen during birth. They are not trying to reduce the problems form happening in the first place like nutrition etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain the pros of having only 1 level of causality

A

Easy to intuitively understand

We can consider the different causes one at a time

Does not overload working memory capacity

16
Q

What becomes more diffiuclt as there are more levels of causality?

A

The more levels, the less intuitive the causality

17
Q

What is working memory?What part of the brain is it linked to?

A

allows us to actively hold in mind and manipulate (limited amount of)
information
* linked to prefrontal cortex (PFC) functions

this is the mental capacity that helps us actival recall and manipulate info. If you are using working memory to work on something you are conscious of it. If you are not conscious of something, it is not working memory. WM has been linked to the pre-frontal cortex. Part of the way placebo and nocebo work is through working memory. This capacity for WM is linked to the pre-frontal cortex.

18
Q

What part of the brain plays a key role in working memory?

A

The lateral PFC as a whole
Plays a key role in working memory

19
Q

is the DLPFC involved in working memory?

A

yes in that it is responsible for expectations

20
Q

What is relational complexity?

A

The number of relations that need to be considered simultaneously within working memory

a cause is a special case of a relation. an expectation is another example of a relation. A relation is A and B relate to each other. If you’re thinking about how they relate to each other you are thinking of the relation. If you are thinking about the expectation and the outcome you are thinking of the relation. A cause is a relationship between one thing occurring and another thing occurring. For relations to be understood with things we don;t have experience with we have to use working memory because we have to think about the 2 things. What can happen is the number of relations can overwhelm our working memory pretty quick.

21
Q

Look at slide 13

A
22
Q

What is the DLPFC involved in regarding causal complexity?

A

Thinking about relations one at a time
(e.g., expectations)

(aka how it works for one level of causation)

23
Q

When is the DLPFC no longer efficient? What impllications does this have for causal complexity?

A

When there are multiple relations that need to be considered simultaneously, DLPFC is no longer sufficient

In this circumstance of 3 levels of causality, you are holding 3 items in mind, 3 relations, and 1 meta relation so the DLPFC is no longer sufficient to help you understsand that.

24
Q

What is the rostral prefrontal cortex? RPFC?

When does this become necessary?

A

Becomes activated when relational integration is necessary.

When 2 relations must be considered simultaneously.

this becomes necessary when you have 2 causes and you are trying to understand how these causes relate to each other.

25
Q

What happens when 3 relations must be considered simultaneously?

A

we run out of space after the RLPFC so we have to recruit our long-term memory. We have to have semantic memory containing a lot of concepts.. We need the help of our long-term memory

26
Q

KNOW SCHEMATIC ON SLIDE 18

A
27
Q

Are things above 2 relations intuitive?

A

no

28
Q

What is the max number of relations that we can hold in working memory?

A

2

29
Q

why is the fact that we can actually have 2 things in working memory not as bad as it seems?

A

The ability of relational integration
* Unique to humans
* Occurs fairly late in child development

This is a pretty big evolutionary improvement

30
Q

What is the evolution of the frontal lobe in primates?

A

the PFC becomes larger proportionally across species. If you compare the brain of a chimp to a human, it doesn’t look that different.

31
Q

KNOW IMAGES ON SLIDE 21

A
32
Q

What takes up a lot of the human frontal lobe that is not as large in other primates?

A

Area 10

RLPFC is the lateral portion of Area 10

33
Q

UNDERSTAND THE INFO ON SLIDE 23 (VERY IMPORTANT)

A
34
Q

How much of our capacity for relational complexity do we use when we think about birth?

A

For the most part we tend to be stuck at 1 relational complexity because we tend to be stuck in mitigation

35
Q

Read and think deeply about this quote.

“The argument for helmet use rests on safety and injury prevention, but at least one study found that mandatory laws and increased mass use of helmets have had no discernible effect on reducing the number of cycling injuries and fatalities in Canada.”

A