Lecture 16 Flashcards
What does the non-heartbeat related belt measure in EFM?how does it work?
This indicates the pressure that the contracting uterus is putting on the device sitting on top of the uterus. When the uterus contracts it also expands and this expansion puts pressure on the device.
LOOK AT DIAGRAM ON SLIDE 4
How do you determine whether there is something of concern relating to the heartbeat in EFM? How about the pressure?
whether there is something of concern relating to the heartbeat depends on when the peak is. As a practitioner you have to make a judgement call about hich of these 3 categories the heartbeat falls into.
she just wants us to understand how subjective these judgement calls are
contractions affect the baby’s heartbeat as well. May make the heartbeat slow down
What is acceleration in EFM?
an abrupt increse in heartrate from baseline. can occur any time during labour
Reassuring sign of fetal well-being
What is variable deacceleration in EFM?
an abrupt decrease in heartrate from baseline
onset varies with contractions
extremely common , present in 83% of labours
What is late deacceleration in EFM?
gradual, symmetrical decrease in heart rate
HR returns to baseline after contraction ends
onset occurs at the peak of contractions
may indicate fetal distress if repetitive or severe.
What are the downsides to using EFM as a fetal surveillance technology?
interpretations of fetal heart tracings are highly subjective
there is very little agreement among experts as to the interpretation of “non-reassuring” tracings
“false-positive” predictions of fetal distress are a given (>99%)
using it increases C-section rates, without improving outcomes for babies
the big danger with relying on this is that babies move a lot and the movement will require someone to go and adjust the belt and if the baby is moving a lot then it will look like there’s more dacceleration because the baby is moving. So a judgement call you have ot make is the deacceleration due to the pick up of due to the baby’s actually heartbeat.
What is EFM a good tool for detecting? What is it not good at detecting?
this tool is really reliable to detect wellbeing but it is a very bad tool to detect fetal distress. When you are trying to interpret the non-reassuring signas, this is where the huge variability in judgement occurs
Why was EFM originally introduced? Did this turn out to be true?
people introduced this promising that it would reduce the rates of cerebral paulsy but this was a hollow promise. the c section rates have increased but the cerebral paulsy rates are unchanged.
What are EFM records usually used for?
brain injury litigation
used by expert witnesses who testify as to when (the exact moment, based on the tracings) the baby sustained irreversible neurological injury (this is the main way of assigning blame to the person who is being attacked)
it is the main tool of blame
is heavily relied upon to support counterfactual claims that a poor outcome (e.g., brain injury) could have been avoided
The counterfactual claims are supported by the EFM
in addition to people becoming worried about false c sections, the litigation lead to c sections going up and up.
What is counterfactual reasoning? What is it the basis of?
- reasoning about “what might have been”
AKA if you did do a c section, then the baby might not have had brain damage - relies on counterfactuals: mental representations of alternatives to the past, often activated automatically in response to negative affect
- the basis for assigning blame for harmful outcomes or giving credit for beneficial out comes
What form does counterfactual reasonign often take?
- often takes the form of if/then statements or questions
e.g.:“If you had been paying attention, you wouldn’t have gotten hurt.”
“If Alice had not been treated with the experimental drug, would she have survived?”
is counterfactual reasoning deliberate?
you can reason counterfactual deliberately but a lot of counterfactual is reasoned automatically. AKA if I had only walked to school instead of boiked, I wouldn;t have been in the hospital right now.
Why can counterfactual reasoning be highly problematic?
- could be highly problematic because of hindsight bias
What is hindsight bias? what is hindsight bias linked to? What is it accompanied by? is it easy to ignore?
- the “knew-it-all-along” effect
THis is a false perception of how much we would have known, or should have known. in the past
- knowing that an event (outcome) has occurred increases its perceived predictability (or perceived likelihood)
meaning this is hard to ignore
knowing that you got into a car accident you may say, I should have knoen that was a bus rooute. This incKnowing that something happened increases the perceived predictabillity of that event.
- linked to the availability heuristic
- accompanied with over-confidence in the certainty of one’s judgements: people are unaware of the effect that outcome knowledge has on their perceptions of predictability