Lecture 16 - Literacy/Reading Flashcards

1
Q

why is english so hard?

A

orthographic depth

english’s syllable structure: simple

not value judgments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

orthographic depth

A

shallow (transparent) orthography: see “o” and say “oh”

deep orthography: see “o”, say…? Context, random

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

looked at reading development

Seymour 2003

A

multi-country study of reading development in Europe

looked 12 languages + English

Roughly evenly divided by: syllabic complexity and orthographic depth

- one sound w/multiple spellings: English, French
- one spelling, multiple sounds: English, Danish 

looked at kid’s abilities to read familiar words and nonsense words (things they should be able to read and sound out)

English had the lowest percentage of reading familiar words correctly

English had the lowest percentage of reading pseudowords correctly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

languages with one sound and multiple spellings

A

English, French

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

languages with one spelling, multiple sounds

A

English, Danish

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Noah Webster

A

American English spelling is different than British english spelling

argued for spelling reforms: wrote the first (and authoritative) Am. dictionary

he changed certain words:

gaol –> jail

mould –> mold

travelled –> traveled

shows how arbitrary spelling is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

there’s more than one way to express speech in written form, which affects learning

A
  • alphabetic (English)

- logographic (Mandarin, Cantonese, some Korean writing systems): roughly one or two symbols per word

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Not everyone does alphabetic text the same way

A

Hebrew: leaves the vowels out (lvs th vwls t)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
There	are	logographic	scripts	that	have	lots	of	characters--not	
just	26	(±)	letters
A

Chinese characters:
• Simplified form has (!!) 6500 characters
• Traditional form has 13500

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Traditional approach to writing

A

teach reading first to get grapheme-phoneme correspondences

and THEN teach writing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

non-tradition approach to learning to write

A

let kids experiment with writing before formal instruction

active involvment rather than passive copying

awareness of written-spoken language relationship

early awareness of alphabetic principle

can read back what they’ve written

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

early logographic representation in alphabetic systems?

Bowman and Treiman

A

gave pre-reading children arbitrary or letter-name related spellings

EX: related: AP for ape, MA for may
arbitrary: OM for ape, PO for may

Results: kids were better at reading and spelling related, esp when vowel was first letter

spelling-sound corrspondence even at the beginning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

invented spelling in early writing

A
  • use letter names (in addition to sounds)

make up stuff they haven’ts seen adults do (pretty phonetic - unlike English itself)

may leave out things like word-final or syllable-final nasals (NOOIGLID for New England)

DOT MAK NOYS = don’t make noise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Early attempts vary by dialect

A
  • US English: “bath” = BATH, hurt = HRT
  • British: “bath” = BARTH, “hurt” = HUT
    • British has no word-final r’s : R’s disappear at the end of syllables

what they’re spelling reflects what they’re hearing in their spoken language: all very sensible sound-spelling mappings based on one’s native dialect !

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Development of different genres

A
  • expressive (more like a narrative) vs. expository (more like an essay or position paper)
  • science fiction story (more expressive vs. science report (more expository)

when kids try to do expository writing a lot of expressive elements sneak in

  • also things like poetry
  • very diff standards, conventions for each style of writing
  • even within domains people have very strong opinions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

first genre to develop?

A

expressive – much like natural story telling that kids would begin producing before they start writing

17
Q

Third-grade science fair

Hi I Perry, the pituitary gland. I control other endocrine glands, growth,
mother’s milk production and I also control the amount of water the
kidneys remove from the blood. … I forgot to tell you but I connect to the
hypothalamus by a stalk. Oh and I’m the size of a pea. Bye.

A
  • still some spelling, grammar errors
  • some expressive elements (first person, conversational)
  • some expository elements - scientific vocab, conveys info about the pituitary gland
18
Q

Expository writing development,

the ideal?

early tries?

A

ideally: very organized, hierarchical, presenting key points and arguments clearly, logically, and succinctly

early tries: knowledge telling or knowledge dumping (writing EVERYTHING you know)
• not well organized, not as effective (conclusions hard to find)

19
Q

expository writing development with instruction (it NEEDS instruction)

A
  • learn to PLAN what they write: laying out the argument logically
  • can ENACT that plan
  • can REVISE as needed (really hard)
  • reading a lot of scientific writing helps a lot: see how others do it
20
Q

Narrative writing development

A

not much instruction, other than creative writing classes

should follow chronological order

21
Q

Writing development

the BIG picture

A
  • matures very slowly into and throughout adulthood
  • doesn’t mature fully in all people : some people can’t write
  • practice makes better
  • it’s the “neglected R”
22
Q

4th - 12th graders

A

only about 25% of them can write “proficiently”

  • “first-rate organization”
  • “convincing and elaborated responses”
  • “rich, evocative, and compelling language”
23
Q

subtractive bilingualism

A

can lose a language

  • start learning writing system young
  • move to another country, forget
24
Q

additive bilingualism

A

can gain a language

  • maybe move to another country
  • maybe attend school
  • maybe new language often source of social prestige
    • old language may be stigmatized/avoided
25
Q

simultaneous bilingualism

A

they show the same stages that kids show as they’re acquiring single language

26
Q

critical period hypothesis

A

can apply to a lot of things but here… for language

there is a critical period for learning language: time of maximal plasticity

may be up to puberty-ish

start seeing drop offs around age 6

maybe you’re biologically more capable of learning a language up to age six

or maybe it’s driven by the information that you know: new language interfering with old language: bias from native language sound categories (by age 6 you’ve had enough exposure that you get this interference)

hot topic: is there even one? if so why?

undeniable that kids are much better at acquiring language but…

they aren’t better at acquiring vocabulary: adults learn new words by hanging it onto the framework of their native language while kid’s are learning from “scratch” so it’s harder to learn new things but they learn them “better” than adults because they don’t have the opportunity to distort