Lecture 16 - Literacy/Reading Flashcards
why is english so hard?
orthographic depth
english’s syllable structure: simple
not value judgments
orthographic depth
shallow (transparent) orthography: see “o” and say “oh”
deep orthography: see “o”, say…? Context, random
looked at reading development
Seymour 2003
multi-country study of reading development in Europe
looked 12 languages + English
Roughly evenly divided by: syllabic complexity and orthographic depth
- one sound w/multiple spellings: English, French - one spelling, multiple sounds: English, Danish
looked at kid’s abilities to read familiar words and nonsense words (things they should be able to read and sound out)
English had the lowest percentage of reading familiar words correctly
English had the lowest percentage of reading pseudowords correctly
languages with one sound and multiple spellings
English, French
languages with one spelling, multiple sounds
English, Danish
Noah Webster
American English spelling is different than British english spelling
argued for spelling reforms: wrote the first (and authoritative) Am. dictionary
he changed certain words:
gaol –> jail
mould –> mold
travelled –> traveled
shows how arbitrary spelling is
there’s more than one way to express speech in written form, which affects learning
- alphabetic (English)
- logographic (Mandarin, Cantonese, some Korean writing systems): roughly one or two symbols per word
Not everyone does alphabetic text the same way
Hebrew: leaves the vowels out (lvs th vwls t)
There are logographic scripts that have lots of characters--not just 26 (±) letters
Chinese characters:
• Simplified form has (!!) 6500 characters
• Traditional form has 13500
Traditional approach to writing
teach reading first to get grapheme-phoneme correspondences
and THEN teach writing
non-tradition approach to learning to write
let kids experiment with writing before formal instruction
active involvment rather than passive copying
awareness of written-spoken language relationship
early awareness of alphabetic principle
can read back what they’ve written
early logographic representation in alphabetic systems?
Bowman and Treiman
gave pre-reading children arbitrary or letter-name related spellings
EX: related: AP for ape, MA for may
arbitrary: OM for ape, PO for may
Results: kids were better at reading and spelling related, esp when vowel was first letter
spelling-sound corrspondence even at the beginning
invented spelling in early writing
- use letter names (in addition to sounds)
make up stuff they haven’ts seen adults do (pretty phonetic - unlike English itself)
may leave out things like word-final or syllable-final nasals (NOOIGLID for New England)
DOT MAK NOYS = don’t make noise
Early attempts vary by dialect
- US English: “bath” = BATH, hurt = HRT
- British: “bath” = BARTH, “hurt” = HUT
• British has no word-final r’s : R’s disappear at the end of syllables
what they’re spelling reflects what they’re hearing in their spoken language: all very sensible sound-spelling mappings based on one’s native dialect !
Development of different genres
- expressive (more like a narrative) vs. expository (more like an essay or position paper)
- science fiction story (more expressive vs. science report (more expository)
when kids try to do expository writing a lot of expressive elements sneak in
- also things like poetry
- very diff standards, conventions for each style of writing
- even within domains people have very strong opinions