Lecture 15- Use of genetic variation: forensics; paternity (law) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

DNA can be taken from a child for forensic tests under the federal Crimes Act if:

A. It is a ‘non-intimate sample’ and not an ‘intimate sample’ as defined in the Act.

B. It is a ‘non-intimate sample’ and a magistrate authorises that the sample be taken from the child for testing after the child has been convicted of a criminal offence.

C. The child is a suspect in custody and a senior constable orders the taking of an ‘intimate sample’.

D. In all of these situations.

A

B is correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the uses of genetic variation in the legal world?

A
  • natural variation in a person’s genetic constitution
  • establishing identity and genetic relationship
  • use of genetic evidence to establish identity and relationship - law
  • paternity testing – law; emotions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Q. A man who is proved to be the biological father of a child:

(a) has a legal right to see the child subject to a court order preventing contact
(b) has a legal obligation to pay child support for the child until the child is 18, even if the child does not live with him.
(c) has a legal right to make medical decisions for the child unless that right has been removed by a court order
(d) has all the rights and duties above.

A

a) yes b) yes c) yes d) yes
- d) is the correct!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Q. When DNA of suspect X is found at a crime scene:

A. It proves conclusively that X was at the scene at the time of the offence.

B. It is evidence that X was at the scene but that can be disproved by other evidence.

C. It proves that X was involved in the crime in some way.

D. It rules out other suspects.

A

B is correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the advantages of using DNA evidence?

A
  • identify/confirm suspect - presumptive proof person present at crime scene
  • especially if person’s DNA is on victim’s body or clothing
  • can rule out suspects; identify victims
  • DNA evidence has high probability of being accurate in establishing identity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the variation in genetic constitution and the issues that come with that?

A
  • Profile: polymerase chain reaction (PCR) – extracts DNA from sample for amplification and analysis
  • Set of numbers: XY 10, 12 18,19, 14,14 15,16, 25,28 16,12 11,10 29,30 17,18.
  • Numbers show number of short tandem repeats (STRs) found at 9 sites or loci along DNA molecule.
  • Two sets of loci – one inherited from each parent.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the disadvantages of using DNA as evidence?

A
  • DNA evidence not conclusive
  • chance of error, contamination of sample, tampering - DNA left innocently or deliberately at crime scene – greater risk than fingerprints
  • shows kinship, predictive info about person, family
  • concerns about privacy and later misuse of genetic test results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the concern of the ex-judge Frank Vincent?

A

-In 2010, ex-judge Frank Vincent reviewed a case in Victoria that illustrates a dangerous reliance on DNA evidence. A man had been imprisoned for six years and only had his conviction quashed after serving 16 months when it was found that the sample used had been contaminated. The DNA had been the only piece of evidence in the rape trial, and Vincent noted that it was not even likely that the unconscious alleged victim had been interfered with at all.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What has new research suggested about the education of jurors and legal officers in regards to DNA evidence?

A

-New research at Charles Sturt University has revealed a pressing need to provide greater education on DNA evidence to legal officers and jurors. The research found that the majority of potential jurors have very little knowledge about the accuracy and application of DNA evidence. The presentation of DNA evidence as infallible on television crime shows has contributed to the lack of understanding. The findings have led to calls for greater education among jurors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the two categories of samples taken from suspects?

A

-intimate and non-intimate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is an intimate sample?

A

-external examination/photo /video/sample of genital/anal/ buttocks, breast; taking blood, pubic hair, dental impression, saliva, buccal swab

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a non-intimate sample?

A
  • exam./photo/video/sample of other areas of body that involves touching body, removing clothing; taking hair sample other than pubic hair; taking sample from nail or under nail; hand, finger, foot, toe print
  • Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 23WA(1)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What forensic tests can be done without consent?

A

• Suspect forced to give DNA sample

  • The Melbourne Magistrates Court ordered a man suspected of involvement in a petrol bomb attack to submit to a DNA test.
  • Magistrate authorised police to use force to obtain a saliva sample if necessary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Under which circumstances can a magistrate order a forensic procedure?

A

(1) A magistrate may, under section 23WS or 23XA, order the carrying out of a forensic procedure on a suspect if:
(a) the suspect is not in custody and has not consented to the forensic procedure (whether or not consent has been sought); or
(b) the suspect is in custody and has not consented to the forensic procedure (whether or not consent has been sought); or
(c) under section 23WE, the suspect cannot consent to the forensic procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What do you have to ask to decide what needs to be done to get a forensic test?

A
  • Is the person to be tested:
    (a) A convicted offender – serious offence?
    (b) A suspect?
    (c) A volunteer (ie wants to be tested or agrees to be tested when asked)?
  • Is the person an adult; a child; or ‘incapable’?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the case when the suspect is a convicted offender?

A

-Convicted offenders (sentenced for Cth offence – max sentence life, 5 or more years imprisonment)

  • Constable may ask serious offender to undergo test (other than child, incapable person) if satisfied it is justified in all circs
  • Prisoner gives informed consent (after info and opportunity to contact lawyer)

-or: • If offender refuses, constable may order carrying out of non-intimate forensic procedure, after considering:

–seriousness of offence committed by offender

–forensic procedure could assist law enforcement (federal or otherwise)

–justified in all circumstances

  • Magistrate or judge may order intimate/non-intimate forensic proc on offender
  • if satisfied it is justified in all circumstances
  • includes child, incapable person
17
Q

What is the case if a suspect is in custody?

A
  1. Suspects If suspect in custody, refuses proc, Senior Constable may order non-intimate proc if satisfied on balance of probabilities:

– Suspect in lawful custody

– Reas gounds to suspect s/he committed relevant offence

– Forensic proc likely to produce evidence

– Justified in all circs

Q: If a suspect is in custody and is a minor or an incapable person, can the senior constable order a non-intimate sample?

NO. Is the only person that can ever order a forensic procedure on a minor/incapable person who is a suspect (not convicted) a magistrate?

YES. • Magistrate may order forensic procedure whether suspect in or out of custody [and intimate/non-intimate] • Includes tests on child or incapable person • After considering similar matters to senior constable

18
Q

What is the case when a person volunteers to give DNA evidence?

A
  • Magistrate may order forensic procedure whether suspect in or out of custody [and intimate/non-intimate]
  • Includes tests on child or incapable person
  • After considering similar matters to senior constable
  • May give informed consent to forensic proc (includes parent consent for child) • Independent witness
  • After constable advises about test – might be evidence used in court – DNA may be placed on DNA data base - can consult lawyer
  • Magistrate may order test if likely to produce evidence
19
Q

What is establishing paternity and other family relationship important for in terms of the legal responsibilities and rights?

A
  • child support
  • inheritance
  • parental responsibilities
  • ‘bonds’ - relationships
  • entitlements – immigration, Aboriginal benefits
20
Q

What is the Magill v Magill case?

A
  • Liam Magill – lost claim against wife for compensation
  • Said ‘ duped’ to support two of her children who were not biologically his -the lawyer representing Mr Magill said: “… the importance of truth in relationships and marriage, a child’s identity and heritage, parentage and the responsibilities that go with that and a person’s blood line, health issues and medical history”
21
Q

What was the non-dad court win?

A

In 2009, the Family Court of Australia granted custody to a man who found out by a paternity test during custody proceedings that he was not the child’s biological father. He was granted custody in preference to his estranged wife. The mother, who now lives overseas, had previously gained custody in the Federal Magistrates Court.

22
Q

Should mother’s consent be required for all paternity tests?

A
  • Note: great majority of ‘motherless’ paternity tests in 2002 Melbourne survey found inquirer was the father
  • most of the tests are done without the mother’s knowledge but it’s been found that the vast majority of tests prove that the man requesting the test is in fact the father